Sparky, with as much unders, why not take Grand Salami under? Safer.
For those who don't know...I don't gamble anymore. I just give my thoughts on games for those who are interested.
For those who don't know...I don't gamble anymore. I just give my thoughts on games for those who are interested.
For those who don't know...I don't gamble anymore. I just give my thoughts on games for those who are interested.
All that analysis .... and the Braves are still going to beat Philly tomorrow. SPARKY
A home fan laughing at another because he thinks there is good value going against his favorite team. Doesn't shock me one bit.
All that analysis .... and the Braves are still going to beat Philly tomorrow. SPARKY
A home fan laughing at another because he thinks there is good value going against his favorite team. Doesn't shock me one bit.
A home fan laughing at another because he thinks there is good value going against his favorite team. Doesn't shock me one bit.
I was only joking. I could have bet the Braves today and won $$$ but I couldn't pull the trigger for the 5th day in a row.
And Uriss, I don't know why you would bet on a game with Jimenez/Lincecum. Detroit looks solid. Mets@SD might be questionable. Please give insight.
A home fan laughing at another because he thinks there is good value going against his favorite team. Doesn't shock me one bit.
I was only joking. I could have bet the Braves today and won $$$ but I couldn't pull the trigger for the 5th day in a row.
And Uriss, I don't know why you would bet on a game with Jimenez/Lincecum. Detroit looks solid. Mets@SD might be questionable. Please give insight.
I was only joking. I could have bet the Braves today and won $$$ but I couldn't pull the trigger for the 5th day in a row.
And Uriss, I don't know why you would bet on a game with Jimenez/Lincecum. Detroit looks solid. Mets@SD might be questionable. Please give insight.
I was only joking. I could have bet the Braves today and won $$$ but I couldn't pull the trigger for the 5th day in a row.
And Uriss, I don't know why you would bet on a game with Jimenez/Lincecum. Detroit looks solid. Mets@SD might be questionable. Please give insight.
I was only joking. I could have bet the Braves today and won $$$ but I couldn't pull the trigger for the 5th day in a row.
And Uriss, I don't know why you would bet on a game with Jimenez/Lincecum. Detroit looks solid. Mets@SD might be questionable. Please give insight.
I think their offense is too inconsistant. What's the deal with McCann? He hasn't done much this season at all. Once he picks up...I'll be happy. Hey...I like the Braves and predicted them to win the WC and I hope they do.
And read post #26. No actual bets on these games. And I can't give any insight more than what I have in my writeups unless you have a specific question that I can try to answer.
I was only joking. I could have bet the Braves today and won $$$ but I couldn't pull the trigger for the 5th day in a row.
And Uriss, I don't know why you would bet on a game with Jimenez/Lincecum. Detroit looks solid. Mets@SD might be questionable. Please give insight.
I think their offense is too inconsistant. What's the deal with McCann? He hasn't done much this season at all. Once he picks up...I'll be happy. Hey...I like the Braves and predicted them to win the WC and I hope they do.
And read post #26. No actual bets on these games. And I can't give any insight more than what I have in my writeups unless you have a specific question that I can try to answer.
For those who don't know...I don't gamble anymore. I just give my thoughts on games for those who are interested.
Apparently, I did not know, but it makes it better capping since you are not biased in any way .
Either way, keep it coming 10191 (zip code?)
For those who don't know...I don't gamble anymore. I just give my thoughts on games for those who are interested.
Apparently, I did not know, but it makes it better capping since you are not biased in any way .
Either way, keep it coming 10191 (zip code?)
The Braves ML should be at about -125 or so, not -155. And the play should be small. I think I am going to wait, and possibly a no play.
I understand Lincecum has struggled his last two outings, but he has been dominant vs Col his last two meetings, giving up 1ER in 15IP. I know this is not a good thing to look at sometimes, because Jimenez seems unstoppable, and the Colorado bats are coming around.
The Braves ML should be at about -125 or so, not -155. And the play should be small. I think I am going to wait, and possibly a no play.
I understand Lincecum has struggled his last two outings, but he has been dominant vs Col his last two meetings, giving up 1ER in 15IP. I know this is not a good thing to look at sometimes, because Jimenez seems unstoppable, and the Colorado bats are coming around.
The Braves ML should be at about -125 or so, not -155. And the play should be small. I think I am going to wait, and possibly a no play.
I understand Lincecum has struggled his last two outings, but he has been dominant vs Col his last two meetings, giving up 1ER in 15IP. I know this is not a good thing to look at sometimes, because Jimenez seems unstoppable, and the Colorado bats are coming around.
The Braves ML should be at about -125 or so, not -155. And the play should be small. I think I am going to wait, and possibly a no play.
I understand Lincecum has struggled his last two outings, but he has been dominant vs Col his last two meetings, giving up 1ER in 15IP. I know this is not a good thing to look at sometimes, because Jimenez seems unstoppable, and the Colorado bats are coming around.
Apparently, I did not know, but it makes it better capping since you are not biased in any way .
Either way, keep it coming 10191 (zip code?)
Nope...just random numbers.
Apparently, I did not know, but it makes it better capping since you are not biased in any way .
Either way, keep it coming 10191 (zip code?)
Nope...just random numbers.
Yanks is easy. Line is too high and any time you are laying wood with a runline, you are making a bad investment.
Braves are within the writeup. Simply too big of a line against the Phillies who can bust out of their slump at any moment.
Yanks is easy. Line is too high and any time you are laying wood with a runline, you are making a bad investment.
Braves are within the writeup. Simply too big of a line against the Phillies who can bust out of their slump at any moment.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.