Your relatives you are stuck with; but all others you may like, dislike, or ignore as you choose.
Season, 36-40-12 / - $500.21, -2% RoR [versus average line of -104]
6/05 - $285 each – flat bets - [3% of bankroll, 10,000 +/- profit/loss]
FG – Brewers -225 – Kelly/Woodruff
FG – Giants -170 – Stewart/Gausman
Comment: Very bluntly I will tell you I am sick and tired of having the right side and getting the wrong result. Call it luck, karma, the position of the moon , stars, and planets or anything else you like. Cody Poteet stunk up the joint for no apparent reason and Spencer Turnbull retired with a push at 4 innings, so that Funkhouser could come in for the fifth and give up 5 runs. Yeah, I know, they both claimed injury, but that does not do me a damn bit of good.
The guys I am backing today share a unique characteristic. Only 5 starters have scored 10 quality starts so far this season and these are two of them. They are both 10-1 and their teams are 16-6 in their starts while Kelly and Stewart come in at 5-7. The odds are justified, perhaps even a few pennies low, not high. I make Woodruff -228 and Gausman -190.
Up yours to the curmudgeon that will call these square, public plays. They are not. They are handicapped probability plays and I do not care what the public thinks or does. Cya later.
Note to OWO: You are accomplishing nothing by just criticizing the game and calling the people that play it (gamblers) a bunch of idiots. We all know your feelings. Add something worthwhile occasionally or stfu.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
7
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Your relatives you are stuck with; but all others you may like, dislike, or ignore as you choose.
Season, 36-40-12 / - $500.21, -2% RoR [versus average line of -104]
6/05 - $285 each – flat bets - [3% of bankroll, 10,000 +/- profit/loss]
FG – Brewers -225 – Kelly/Woodruff
FG – Giants -170 – Stewart/Gausman
Comment: Very bluntly I will tell you I am sick and tired of having the right side and getting the wrong result. Call it luck, karma, the position of the moon , stars, and planets or anything else you like. Cody Poteet stunk up the joint for no apparent reason and Spencer Turnbull retired with a push at 4 innings, so that Funkhouser could come in for the fifth and give up 5 runs. Yeah, I know, they both claimed injury, but that does not do me a damn bit of good.
The guys I am backing today share a unique characteristic. Only 5 starters have scored 10 quality starts so far this season and these are two of them. They are both 10-1 and their teams are 16-6 in their starts while Kelly and Stewart come in at 5-7. The odds are justified, perhaps even a few pennies low, not high. I make Woodruff -228 and Gausman -190.
Up yours to the curmudgeon that will call these square, public plays. They are not. They are handicapped probability plays and I do not care what the public thinks or does. Cya later.
Note to OWO: You are accomplishing nothing by just criticizing the game and calling the people that play it (gamblers) a bunch of idiots. We all know your feelings. Add something worthwhile occasionally or stfu.
been riding the giants throughout the series but can't lay the juice on this one. i think it hits, but there's so much hype on gausman that it gets me nervous. good luck and go pirates
No team is as good as it looks when winning nor are they as bad as they look when losing
0
been riding the giants throughout the series but can't lay the juice on this one. i think it hits, but there's so much hype on gausman that it gets me nervous. good luck and go pirates
I find it remarkable that there are posters awaiting the unwary to post anything so they can damn it , regardless of the team or even kind of wager. Like I told you Key , there are a handful of posters i follow. The rest i completely ignore. ala KS. You know, if everyone posted along w/their picks their running total for the year it would soon be obvious how good a handicapper you are. I think most people realize they will lose , & want no part of a running total. Try One play a day , $100 , & let's see your outcome. Or just keep being assholes and damning others posts. And Key , worry not of false prophets.
pollockanesian
2
I find it remarkable that there are posters awaiting the unwary to post anything so they can damn it , regardless of the team or even kind of wager. Like I told you Key , there are a handful of posters i follow. The rest i completely ignore. ala KS. You know, if everyone posted along w/their picks their running total for the year it would soon be obvious how good a handicapper you are. I think most people realize they will lose , & want no part of a running total. Try One play a day , $100 , & let's see your outcome. Or just keep being assholes and damning others posts. And Key , worry not of false prophets.
Everyone here comes at this with different amounts of capital, 'knowledge base' , approach to wagering, wagering time horizons,, some try to make money, some do make money, some need to make the money( supplement) so pay no mind to KS or anyone trying to break you.
You are a class act
3
@KeyElement
Wager as you wish...post as you wish and see fit.
Everyone here comes at this with different amounts of capital, 'knowledge base' , approach to wagering, wagering time horizons,, some try to make money, some do make money, some need to make the money( supplement) so pay no mind to KS or anyone trying to break you.
@KeyElement Wager as you wish...post as you wish and see fit. Everyone here comes at this with different amounts of capital, 'knowledge base' , approach to wagering, wagering time horizons,, some try to make money, some do make money, some need to make the money( supplement) so pay no mind to KS or anyone trying to break you. You are a class act
Well said sir.
pollockanesian
1
Quote Originally Posted by umgmu:
@KeyElement Wager as you wish...post as you wish and see fit. Everyone here comes at this with different amounts of capital, 'knowledge base' , approach to wagering, wagering time horizons,, some try to make money, some do make money, some need to make the money( supplement) so pay no mind to KS or anyone trying to break you. You are a class act
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.