MLB Daily 2024 / ($1.00 is my unit, 100 units per play)
Record 23-22-8, -33.21, RoR -0.8%
6/14
F5 Yankees RL, -115, Gil/Bello
I am doing something here I hate to do. I do not believe in laying both runs and odds in an MLB game. That is a football-basketball thing we are pretty much stuck with since most folks don’t play the money line in those sports. Amen.
Today there is no reason whatsoever Bello should survive 5 innings versus the Yankee bats, while Gil could very easily shut down the BoSox. My computer predicts as high as a 6-1 Yankees F5 win, and I am not going to argue with it. There are many factors involved, but the greatest is that according to my program Gill rates 32.3 points above average and Bello 14.3 points below average, based on a scale of 0 to 100, with the average being 63. That’s right, a potential rookie of the year rates a 95.3 on a scale of 0 to100.
BOL
My analysis of the run line / -1 line combination probability
The concept was posted yesterday on Covers, not by me
You obviously have 2.8 units at risk, 3 possible outcomes
Dodgers lose the game – minus 2.8 units
Dodgers win by 1 run - +/- 0
Dodgers win by 2 or more – win 2.15 units
So, in the best case scenario you will win 2.15 units on a risk of 2.8 units
2.15/2.8 = 76.8% return on risk
You wagered a lot for the same profit potential a -130 favorite would have returned, but had only a one in three possibility of turning a profit, whether you flat play or add the juice. IMHO it just doesn’t make sense. The -130 favorite stood a one in two possibility of turning a profit. There are no slick, intricate ways you gain an advantage on the house. Far better mathematicians than you have worked out formulas that always benefit the house. Exotic bets and attempting to “cover your ass” is never going to work in the long run.
There, just like many times in the past sixteen years, I have wasted my time, energy, and talent on something that will never be respected by the Covers Fraternity. Yippee!