Twins: I have to figure there are a heck of lot of BoSox fans out there betting on the come because I cannot believe they are backing Buchholz or their sporadic offense. Maybe it is the concept that the superior team is bound to stage a comeback. If that is the case they should read the standings. They do not have the superior team.
Giants: This is almost the opposite case. Brewers backers are putting a huge value on HFA that simply does not exist. There is simply no other explanation considering I spotted Bumgarner-Giants at -151 with a 65.9% probability of winning this game. The linemakers weren’t far off at -145 and the bettors that have driven it down are nuts in my opinion. One bad game by Alex Wood does not mean their mediocre (at best) offense for lefties is suddenly going to jump up and start bashing guys like Bumgarner. BOL
Sorry I am so late today but I had a neighbor with an emergency that took precedence. I will try to be much earlier tomorrow.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
5-25
$249 Phillies, +154 (Gonzalez/Colon) L
$249 Giants, +113 (Lincecum/Lohse) W
$249 Diamondbacks, +152 (Anderson/Martinez) L
$242Padres, +118 (Ross/Weaver) L
YTD 51-40, +$3,739.55 (+19.86% RoR)
5-26
$242 Twins, +132 (Buchholz/Pelfrey)
$242 Giants, -130 (Bumgarner/Garza)
Twins: I have to figure there are a heck of lot of BoSox fans out there betting on the come because I cannot believe they are backing Buchholz or their sporadic offense. Maybe it is the concept that the superior team is bound to stage a comeback. If that is the case they should read the standings. They do not have the superior team.
Giants: This is almost the opposite case. Brewers backers are putting a huge value on HFA that simply does not exist. There is simply no other explanation considering I spotted Bumgarner-Giants at -151 with a 65.9% probability of winning this game. The linemakers weren’t far off at -145 and the bettors that have driven it down are nuts in my opinion. One bad game by Alex Wood does not mean their mediocre (at best) offense for lefties is suddenly going to jump up and start bashing guys like Bumgarner. BOL
Sorry I am so late today but I had a neighbor with an emergency that took precedence. I will try to be much earlier tomorrow.
Twins: I have to figure there are a heck of lot of BoSox fans out there betting on the come because I cannot believe they are backing Buchholz or their sporadic offense. Maybe it is the concept that the superior team is bound to stage a comeback. If that is the case they should read the standings. They do not have the superior team.
Twins were just a strong lean but pass for me early this morning, but after that BoSox line kept getting pounded and pounded, I was forced to bite. Good luck to us.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Twins: I have to figure there are a heck of lot of BoSox fans out there betting on the come because I cannot believe they are backing Buchholz or their sporadic offense. Maybe it is the concept that the superior team is bound to stage a comeback. If that is the case they should read the standings. They do not have the superior team.
Twins were just a strong lean but pass for me early this morning, but after that BoSox line kept getting pounded and pounded, I was forced to bite. Good luck to us.
Buchholz has 3 QS in a row and had given up 7 runs in those 3. The Red Sox have played the back up catcher in those 3 starts, not sure who's going to catch today. I do agree the Twins are the better tm, just wondering if Clay has found something
0
Buchholz has 3 QS in a row and had given up 7 runs in those 3. The Red Sox have played the back up catcher in those 3 starts, not sure who's going to catch today. I do agree the Twins are the better tm, just wondering if Clay has found something
i respect your opinion a lot man and i had a question for you about first 5's...
yesterday i took the Giants on the First 5 innings bet which lost, only to see them erupt for 7 runs in the SIXTH against Lohse
obviously u took them full game and reaped the rewards of that 6th inning... is it just completely flawed logic by me taking the first 5 because i was betting almost solely on the pitching matchup? or is this just very results oriented thinking to think this way...
i guess im just curious why you choose to bet the full game instead of first 5 when baseball is so starting pitcher dependant.... is there more or less variance when taking the first 5? i originally thought less but now i might have changed my mind and may start betting full games...
than you k in advance for commenting
0
hey Key--
i respect your opinion a lot man and i had a question for you about first 5's...
yesterday i took the Giants on the First 5 innings bet which lost, only to see them erupt for 7 runs in the SIXTH against Lohse
obviously u took them full game and reaped the rewards of that 6th inning... is it just completely flawed logic by me taking the first 5 because i was betting almost solely on the pitching matchup? or is this just very results oriented thinking to think this way...
i guess im just curious why you choose to bet the full game instead of first 5 when baseball is so starting pitcher dependant.... is there more or less variance when taking the first 5? i originally thought less but now i might have changed my mind and may start betting full games...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.