Why do you even bother or feel dignified with a response to the trolling invaders?
They are probably early 20's idiots who know it all; or you are betting against their teams and then they come out. Now it's just going to bring them out even more...
Why do you even bother or feel dignified with a response to the trolling invaders?
They are probably early 20's idiots who know it all; or you are betting against their teams and then they come out. Now it's just going to bring them out even more...
5-04
$306 Athletics +104, (Hahn/Greene) W
$306 Cubs +107, (Arrieta/Gonzalez) W
YTD 66-42, +$7,304.83 (+31.56% RoR)
5-05
$365 Giants -122, (Lincecum/Williams)
$365 Athletics +105, (Kazmir/Miley)
$365 Rays +100, (Odorizzi/Happ)
Giants: The only thing surprising here is the line, but that is a simple matter of bettors supporting the old Home Field Advantage for far more than it is worth. I have to point out that I LOVE Jerome Williams. He is a real Clydesdale at a career 6.84 innings per start for minimum wage and almost no success. There will always be job for a guy that eats innings for minimum wage, so someone always wants him. According to my numbers the Lincecum-Williams matchup is worth 48.5 cents of line value even before you grant the Giants a better offense.
Athletics: A little slimmer probability here but Kazmir definitely gives us an edge over Miley and the A’s are actually hitting lefties better than the BoSux right now. As I pointed out to someone yesterday, MLB is an ever changing landscape and no team is exactly the same team they were April 1st, May 1st, or even June 1st. We have to catch performance and momentum changes and capitalize on them. Most of the public will use YTD stats to compute probability and that is one thing that gets them in trouble with Guido (the bookies enforcer).
Rays: I could be wrong of course but in my opinion Jake Odorizzi is still one of MLB’s most undervalued commodities. Part of that is the overall disrespect the Rays get and part of it is due to the (well deserved) respect Archer and the rest of the starting staff do get. Whatever the reason, Jake is a clearly superior chucker to J.A. Happ and has an offense behind him that is more productive versus lefty than Happ’s is versus righty.
BOL
5-04
$306 Athletics +104, (Hahn/Greene) W
$306 Cubs +107, (Arrieta/Gonzalez) W
YTD 66-42, +$7,304.83 (+31.56% RoR)
5-05
$365 Giants -122, (Lincecum/Williams)
$365 Athletics +105, (Kazmir/Miley)
$365 Rays +100, (Odorizzi/Happ)
Giants: The only thing surprising here is the line, but that is a simple matter of bettors supporting the old Home Field Advantage for far more than it is worth. I have to point out that I LOVE Jerome Williams. He is a real Clydesdale at a career 6.84 innings per start for minimum wage and almost no success. There will always be job for a guy that eats innings for minimum wage, so someone always wants him. According to my numbers the Lincecum-Williams matchup is worth 48.5 cents of line value even before you grant the Giants a better offense.
Athletics: A little slimmer probability here but Kazmir definitely gives us an edge over Miley and the A’s are actually hitting lefties better than the BoSux right now. As I pointed out to someone yesterday, MLB is an ever changing landscape and no team is exactly the same team they were April 1st, May 1st, or even June 1st. We have to catch performance and momentum changes and capitalize on them. Most of the public will use YTD stats to compute probability and that is one thing that gets them in trouble with Guido (the bookies enforcer).
Rays: I could be wrong of course but in my opinion Jake Odorizzi is still one of MLB’s most undervalued commodities. Part of that is the overall disrespect the Rays get and part of it is due to the (well deserved) respect Archer and the rest of the starting staff do get. Whatever the reason, Jake is a clearly superior chucker to J.A. Happ and has an offense behind him that is more productive versus lefty than Happ’s is versus righty.
BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.