No doubt kershaw was the better pitcher on the hotter team playing at home. And the odds reflected that. But how do you accurately compute a win percentage of 74%?
Totally unique data base and formulas. Why do what everyone else does? All you get is what everyone else gets and 80% of the public loses every year and 95% over the course of 5 to 10 years. All I will tell you is that 74% is extremely rare. Most games do not exceed 60-65% and even that is a little rare, but that is the way it should be, because teams rarely win a higher percentage than that, even in best versus worst matchups. Today there is not one computation that even reaches 60%, but every favorite will have money thrown at them because many people will think that each "can't lose." Especially home favorites, almost all are overpriced except the "bad" one, Diamondbacks, playing the great public favorite, the "unreal" Orioles.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by gamblingallday:
No doubt kershaw was the better pitcher on the hotter team playing at home. And the odds reflected that. But how do you accurately compute a win percentage of 74%?
Totally unique data base and formulas. Why do what everyone else does? All you get is what everyone else gets and 80% of the public loses every year and 95% over the course of 5 to 10 years. All I will tell you is that 74% is extremely rare. Most games do not exceed 60-65% and even that is a little rare, but that is the way it should be, because teams rarely win a higher percentage than that, even in best versus worst matchups. Today there is not one computation that even reaches 60%, but every favorite will have money thrown at them because many people will think that each "can't lose." Especially home favorites, almost all are overpriced except the "bad" one, Diamondbacks, playing the great public favorite, the "unreal" Orioles.
KeyElement was dismissive of devildare and it did not become him.
Discretion is the better part of valor. It is best to know when an argument is pointless and will serve no purpose. Your money, your choice, may sound dismissive to you but it is a clear statement of wagering fact and options. If there were not customers for both Fords and Chevrolets they would not make both.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by capuchaboy:
KeyElement was dismissive of devildare and it did not become him.
Discretion is the better part of valor. It is best to know when an argument is pointless and will serve no purpose. Your money, your choice, may sound dismissive to you but it is a clear statement of wagering fact and options. If there were not customers for both Fords and Chevrolets they would not make both.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.