All Forums | MLB Betting

Texas at Cleveland - the series finale at high noon

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 28916
Posts: 693
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #301
Sympathies to under backers in this Rangers/Indians mop job.  That was an awful tease.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2310
Posted: #302
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

Why not, wshustler?  I put my trust in Wade LeBlanc and the Padres last Friday, and on a night where I was already 1-5 for -27 units, they saved me with a beautiful 20 unit winner at +280, +1.5 +130, and -1.5 +470.  Beyond that, though, the Padres have been winning now for the last six weeks and it's gone mostly unnoticed because they're the Padres.  San Diego is 24-16 since my winning streak began on July 28th.  That's a slightly better record than the Giants have over the same period of time.  And if you throw out their six games against the mighty Cardinals, that record for the Pads improves to 23-11.  Would you believe that during this run (again, with the exception of the buttkicking Cards), the Padres have won 9 of their last 10 series?  And today is the rubber game of this series with the Giants.

great analysis but i think as with the Texas game, you are missing the obvious...

SF NEEDS this game... SD is dead dead dead...

The Giants cannot afford to give games away to teams like SD and THEY KNOW IT!

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 38704
Posted: #303
Like the Padres as well. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2310
Posted: #304
oh and here's another stevebaily classic....
 
always talking about how he wants to "BRAKE" someone's nose...
 
LORD HAVE MERCY!
 
A fucking downsydrom can win at this and I can't... what is wrong with this picture???
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 9084
Posted: #305
What about Tennis bator, the line was at Oudin +220 but has gone down to 185.  Do you think Melanie Oudin with home court has the right stuff to beat Caroline Wozniacki?
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 1889
Posted: #306
covers needs to create a block button, so morons like stevebailey wouldn't need to be banned, but nobody would ever have to read their spew. would also help with the bashers, who granted are far more intelligent than this clown, but almost as annoying
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 4611
Posted: #307
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

Sympathies to under backers in this Rangers/Indians mop job.  That was an awful tease.

thanks bator. i just woke up and saw the score, figured they got it throughout the game and it was just another one run loss. then i saw the box score, i swear if i wasnt hungover i would have broken some shit 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 14574
Posted: #308
since when does the wind ever blow in at that san francisco park ?
 
weird .
 
always see it blowing out 10-15 mph .
 
today 9 mph in from center .
 
kooky . plus no kouzmanoff even though he hits .273 with 2 homers and a team leading by far 7 rbi against mr.zito .
 
is edgar gonzalez adrian's older brother ? i think so . same 'stache
like a bean burrito gone awry and the only napkins you had were used because the dog peed on the picnic table .
 
here's to hoping you are the first person in the oscar salazar fan club bator
 
 
 
 
BACK PATTING and KISSING threads are like passing HAM SANDWICHES around over and over-wall
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 4147
Posted: #309
i guess CLEV was the wrong pick... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 4106
Posted: #310
Sympathies to under backers in this Rangers/Indians mop job.  That was an awful tease}}}
 
Bator thanks for that thought but I'm immune  That Col SF  extra inning game a few weeks ago  where I had under 9 1/2 going into the 10th 1=1 and lost it as well as the game on a walk off grand slam was far worse   Went out and had a few scotches to sooth my soul
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2310
Posted: #311
Quote Originally Posted by BigEv617:

i guess CLEV was the wrong pick... 

Great, another rocket scientist in the forum

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 2843
Posted: #312
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

Sympathies to under backers in this Rangers/Indians mop job.  That was an awful tease.

thank you, yes is was distresing to not get that 1.5 units of the 3.85 i had on cleveland...on tap?

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 20320
Posted: #313
Quote Originally Posted by MakaveliThaDon:

great analysis but i think as with the Texas game, you are missing the obvious...

SF NEEDS this game... SD is dead dead dead...

The Giants cannot afford to give games away to teams like SD and THEY KNOW IT!

They knew this last night and gave up the lead in the 7th inning.  Plus the line is way higher then it should be.  Mostly due to your exact thinking.  Knowing people will pay a price for what they think. 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #314
Quote Originally Posted by stevebaily6:

What about Tennis bator, the line was at Oudin +220 but has gone down to 185.  Do you think Melanie Oudin with home court has the right stuff to beat Caroline Wozniacki?

 

 

They're betting on her because she's gotten a lot of exposure on ESPN as the pretty blond 17-year old tennis whiz.  She'll probably get stomped.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2310
Posted: #315
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

They're betting on her because she's gotten a lot of exposure on ESPN as the pretty blond 17-year old tennis whiz.  She'll probably get stomped.

she'll lose this one 0-2

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 9084
Posted: #316
Wade LeBlanc and the Padres+166, do we all agree on this?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2310
Posted: #317
still rollin with SD bator or did you get cold feet?
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #318
San Diego +176 risking 8 units
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 839
Posted: #319
any O/U leans ?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #320
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

San Diego +176 risking 8 units

 

 

Five of that is at +176 and three of it is at +178.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 2310
Posted: #321
4 units @ +174 here
 
If this loses I really might start to think you aren't on our side Bator.... GL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #322
Damn.  Pinnacle ticked upward to +179 and then to +181.  I tried to bet more at +181 but got shutout.  Just as well.  That would have been "overbetting due to better number envy." 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 695
Posted: #323
wow
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 26467
Posted: #324
shit
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #325
Quote Originally Posted by MakaveliThaDon:

4 units @ +174 here
 
If this loses I really might start to think you aren't on our side Bator.... GL

 

 

What?  No....

 

Stick with me.  I've got a big play on the Washington Generals tonight that you're gonna love.

 

 

 

All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.