Fading Bucks as an OT winner last night. Small Under as well.
No time today, going to visit the FRUITCAKES (in-laws) in the desert.
Today's plays.
Utah 4 units, Detroit and Detroit Over 1 unit each.
Fading Bucks as an OT winner last night. Small Under as well.
No time today, going to visit the FRUITCAKES (in-laws) in the desert.
Today's plays.
Utah 4 units, Detroit and Detroit Over 1 unit each.
Fading Bucks as an OT winner last night. Small Under as well.
No time today, going to visit the FRUITCAKES (in-laws) in the desert.
Today's plays.
Utah 4 units, Detroit and Detroit Over 1 unit each.
Fading Bucks as an OT winner last night. Small Under as well.
No time today, going to visit the FRUITCAKES (in-laws) in the desert.
Today's plays.
Utah 4 units, Detroit and Detroit Over 1 unit each.
Fading Bucks as an OT winner last night. Small Under as well.
No time today, going to visit the FRUITCAKES (in-laws) in the desert.
Today's plays.
Utah 4 units, Detroit and Detroit Over 1 unit each.
The Bulls are 3-10 ATS in their last 13 games following a S.U. win. The Hawks are 20-6-1 ATS in their last 27 games playing on 0 days rest. Atlanta is 5-1-1 ATS in its last 7 Saturday games.
The Bulls are 3-10 ATS in their last 13 games following a S.U. win. The Hawks are 20-6-1 ATS in their last 27 games playing on 0 days rest. Atlanta is 5-1-1 ATS in its last 7 Saturday games.
Lakers/Clips Seasonal Chase 22-12 ATS...as you know I don't post every game and you might have taken NO vs the Clips this week due to jet lag and Sac vs the Clips last night and we would have been wrong both times...I don't want to play every game unless I really like it and if you've been following me, you know I DO LIKE THIS ONE...
Lakers vs GS...I will probably go extra on this-at least 2 units...I see multple good reasons to take GS moneyline on this one...GS is the kind of team the Lakers will never be able to stop-fast, especially the backcourt and they also want to prove they belong. Lakers might even play a little Nash tonight-that will only mix it up and he can't guard anyone anyway. They can also shoot 3's and make free throws-huge adv with the guards, AND, the Lakers have excuses-we're getting ready for Nash, Tuesday's more imp, blah, blah, blah.
The bottom line is they will only be mediocre this year and D'Antoni is the wrong coach for Pau Gasol-just wasting his talent and he doesn't know where to fit in...
I'm be taking GS in the first half too. I expect a major blow out here and if I'm wrong tell me why the Lakers win...
GL
Lakers/Clips Seasonal Chase 22-12 ATS...as you know I don't post every game and you might have taken NO vs the Clips this week due to jet lag and Sac vs the Clips last night and we would have been wrong both times...I don't want to play every game unless I really like it and if you've been following me, you know I DO LIKE THIS ONE...
Lakers vs GS...I will probably go extra on this-at least 2 units...I see multple good reasons to take GS moneyline on this one...GS is the kind of team the Lakers will never be able to stop-fast, especially the backcourt and they also want to prove they belong. Lakers might even play a little Nash tonight-that will only mix it up and he can't guard anyone anyway. They can also shoot 3's and make free throws-huge adv with the guards, AND, the Lakers have excuses-we're getting ready for Nash, Tuesday's more imp, blah, blah, blah.
The bottom line is they will only be mediocre this year and D'Antoni is the wrong coach for Pau Gasol-just wasting his talent and he doesn't know where to fit in...
I'm be taking GS in the first half too. I expect a major blow out here and if I'm wrong tell me why the Lakers win...
GL
Lakers/Clips Seasonal Chase 22-12 ATS...as you know I don't post every game and you might have taken NO vs the Clips this week due to jet lag and Sac vs the Clips last night and we would have been wrong both times...I don't want to play every game unless I really like it and if you've been following me, you know I DO LIKE THIS ONE...
Lakers vs GS...I will probably go extra on this-at least 2 units...I see multple good reasons to take GS moneyline on this one...GS is the kind of team the Lakers will never be able to stop-fast, especially the backcourt and they also want to prove they belong. Lakers might even play a little Nash tonight-that will only mix it up and he can't guard anyone anyway. They can also shoot 3's and make free throws-huge adv with the guards, AND, the Lakers have excuses-we're getting ready for Nash, Tuesday's more imp, blah, blah, blah.
The bottom line is they will only be mediocre this year and D'Antoni is the wrong coach for Pau Gasol-just wasting his talent and he doesn't know where to fit in...
I'm be taking GS in the first half too. I expect a major blow out here and if I'm wrong tell me why the Lakers win...
GL
Lakers/Clips Seasonal Chase 22-12 ATS...as you know I don't post every game and you might have taken NO vs the Clips this week due to jet lag and Sac vs the Clips last night and we would have been wrong both times...I don't want to play every game unless I really like it and if you've been following me, you know I DO LIKE THIS ONE...
Lakers vs GS...I will probably go extra on this-at least 2 units...I see multple good reasons to take GS moneyline on this one...GS is the kind of team the Lakers will never be able to stop-fast, especially the backcourt and they also want to prove they belong. Lakers might even play a little Nash tonight-that will only mix it up and he can't guard anyone anyway. They can also shoot 3's and make free throws-huge adv with the guards, AND, the Lakers have excuses-we're getting ready for Nash, Tuesday's more imp, blah, blah, blah.
The bottom line is they will only be mediocre this year and D'Antoni is the wrong coach for Pau Gasol-just wasting his talent and he doesn't know where to fit in...
I'm be taking GS in the first half too. I expect a major blow out here and if I'm wrong tell me why the Lakers win...
GL
yeah but I broke even on the first half cashing so that's gambling...but defense, age and free throw shooting will kill this team ...there's going to be value in spots...
yeah but I broke even on the first half cashing so that's gambling...but defense, age and free throw shooting will kill this team ...there's going to be value in spots...
As those of you that have followed us in the past know, the vast majority of our angles will point you to live underdogs and live ‘unders’ when we have total angles. All of our season-long trends go back to 2005, as that gives us a large enough sampling without going back too far to games that may pre-date certain changes in the game that may make using older games less than ideal.
Here are our NFL Trends & Angles for Week 16, with all records being for the last seven seasons since 2005 plus the first 15 weeks of this season.
Angle #1 - During the month of December only, play against any favorite coming off of two or more losses (53-31-2, 63.1% ATS): There are two reasons why this angle has worked so well. For teams that are still fighting for playoff spots, lines get artificially inflated for that reason alone even though they are not playing well lately. For teams eliminated from the playoff hunt, they are usually playing fellow non-playoff contenders if they are favored after two losses and those types of meaningless games are generally crapshoots with the underdogs having inherent value. Qualifiers: Arizona +7 to 7.5 vs. Chicago, Cincinnati +3½ to 4 and St. Louis +3.5 to 4.
Angle #2 - During the month of December only, play on any road underdog that was an underdog in each of the last two games (72-42-1, 63.2% ATS): Bettors generally tend to stay away from teams that are often underdogs at any time of year, but that becomes even more pronounced in December when these constant dogs are either playing playoff contenders or are underdogs to non-playoff contenders, which is an indication of how poorly perceived the teams are. Thus, books are able to pad these lines and still get public money on the favorites. Qualifiers: Minnesota +8 and Tennessee +13 to 14.
Angle #3 - Play on any team that lost its last game by 28 or more points (95-60-4, 61.3% ATS): This angle combines two concepts, as professional teams in any sport do not like to get embarrassed and oftentimes bounce back strong in their next game, and also bettors tend to shy away from these teams, often leading to added line value. This angle swept 2-0 in Week 15. Qualifiers: Detroit +3½ to 4 (Saturday)Angle #4 - Play on any conference road underdog coming off of a road game (171-112-5, 60.4% ATS):
It used to be that teams playing consecutive road games were great
fades, but as that angle became common knowledge, bookmakers started to
adjust the point spreads for teams playing on the road off of a road
game. Well, based on these long-term results, they may have
over-adjusted the lines, especially in the case of road underdogs taking
on conference foes that they are quite familiar with.. This angle lost
its only play in Week 15. Qualifier: Cincinnati +3½ to 4. (Double Angle)
Angle #5 - Bet against any home team coming off of five or more straight up wins (62-43-3, 59.0% ATS): Very few angles epitomize our contrarian mindset as well as this one does! Bettors love to play hot teams, especially at home, but the oddsmakers know this and this angle looks to take advantage of teams that are becoming overvalued. Yes, fading these teams may take some courage at times, but check out the winning percentage of this angle over a nice-sized sampling. This angle won its only play in Week 15 with the 49ers over the Patriots. Qualifier: Cleveland + 12 to 14 vs Denver.
My biggest play, Bears -5 (closing line buy down 1 point official line). This same final game chase matches my "hold your nose" play on Dallas vs Cincy which was a final game chase play. Minimum 2 unit play, or recover loss from last week if you tailed me on the Bears plus 1 unit profit.
Saints +3 to +3.5 or 4 if reasonable. I think Dallas will choke now that the pressure had been dialed up to max! All Dallas media is telling them they are good. Time for a wake-up call vs. Drew Brees! One unit Cryboy fade play...
As those of you that have followed us in the past know, the vast majority of our angles will point you to live underdogs and live ‘unders’ when we have total angles. All of our season-long trends go back to 2005, as that gives us a large enough sampling without going back too far to games that may pre-date certain changes in the game that may make using older games less than ideal.
Here are our NFL Trends & Angles for Week 16, with all records being for the last seven seasons since 2005 plus the first 15 weeks of this season.
Angle #1 - During the month of December only, play against any favorite coming off of two or more losses (53-31-2, 63.1% ATS): There are two reasons why this angle has worked so well. For teams that are still fighting for playoff spots, lines get artificially inflated for that reason alone even though they are not playing well lately. For teams eliminated from the playoff hunt, they are usually playing fellow non-playoff contenders if they are favored after two losses and those types of meaningless games are generally crapshoots with the underdogs having inherent value. Qualifiers: Arizona +7 to 7.5 vs. Chicago, Cincinnati +3½ to 4 and St. Louis +3.5 to 4.
Angle #2 - During the month of December only, play on any road underdog that was an underdog in each of the last two games (72-42-1, 63.2% ATS): Bettors generally tend to stay away from teams that are often underdogs at any time of year, but that becomes even more pronounced in December when these constant dogs are either playing playoff contenders or are underdogs to non-playoff contenders, which is an indication of how poorly perceived the teams are. Thus, books are able to pad these lines and still get public money on the favorites. Qualifiers: Minnesota +8 and Tennessee +13 to 14.
Angle #3 - Play on any team that lost its last game by 28 or more points (95-60-4, 61.3% ATS): This angle combines two concepts, as professional teams in any sport do not like to get embarrassed and oftentimes bounce back strong in their next game, and also bettors tend to shy away from these teams, often leading to added line value. This angle swept 2-0 in Week 15. Qualifiers: Detroit +3½ to 4 (Saturday)Angle #4 - Play on any conference road underdog coming off of a road game (171-112-5, 60.4% ATS):
It used to be that teams playing consecutive road games were great
fades, but as that angle became common knowledge, bookmakers started to
adjust the point spreads for teams playing on the road off of a road
game. Well, based on these long-term results, they may have
over-adjusted the lines, especially in the case of road underdogs taking
on conference foes that they are quite familiar with.. This angle lost
its only play in Week 15. Qualifier: Cincinnati +3½ to 4. (Double Angle)
Angle #5 - Bet against any home team coming off of five or more straight up wins (62-43-3, 59.0% ATS): Very few angles epitomize our contrarian mindset as well as this one does! Bettors love to play hot teams, especially at home, but the oddsmakers know this and this angle looks to take advantage of teams that are becoming overvalued. Yes, fading these teams may take some courage at times, but check out the winning percentage of this angle over a nice-sized sampling. This angle won its only play in Week 15 with the 49ers over the Patriots. Qualifier: Cleveland + 12 to 14 vs Denver.
My biggest play, Bears -5 (closing line buy down 1 point official line). This same final game chase matches my "hold your nose" play on Dallas vs Cincy which was a final game chase play. Minimum 2 unit play, or recover loss from last week if you tailed me on the Bears plus 1 unit profit.
Saints +3 to +3.5 or 4 if reasonable. I think Dallas will choke now that the pressure had been dialed up to max! All Dallas media is telling them they are good. Time for a wake-up call vs. Drew Brees! One unit Cryboy fade play...
Angle on your chase that's 26-3-didn't you lose on Mem last night? Or where do I see the spreadsheet on this?
On your NFL trends, what is the ATS over the season?
Thanks.
Angle on your chase that's 26-3-didn't you lose on Mem last night? Or where do I see the spreadsheet on this?
On your NFL trends, what is the ATS over the season?
Thanks.
Angle on your chase that's 26-3-didn't you lose on Mem last night? Or where do I see the spreadsheet on this?
On your NFL trends, what is the ATS over the season?
Thanks.
Angle on your chase that's 26-3-didn't you lose on Mem last night? Or where do I see the spreadsheet on this?
On your NFL trends, what is the ATS over the season?
Thanks.
Wish I saw the bears earlier. line is now 7 yikes
pulling the trigger on the bills+4.5
Wish I saw the bears earlier. line is now 7 yikes
pulling the trigger on the bills+4.5
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.