All Forums | MLB Betting

Why is Boston only -120 tomorrow vs Scott Baker and Minn?

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 2993
Posts: 105
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #26
I think the game will go UNDER in the Red-Sox twins game, but not gonna bet it, unless someone gave me free money
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17423
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by SharpBettor1:

I'm not so sure about the OVER on the Red sox-Twins game, but if Red sox happen to win this game tonight, I think I will take MINNY moneyline
 

Tru Dat....might just wait and see how this ends...and stay the fuk away.  God point Sharp1
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 29723
Posted: #28
On July 17, 2011 Bos played on Sunday Night Baseball @ TB. Bos won that game 1-0 in 16 innings. They flew to play Bal the next day @ Bal and won 15-10...May be over is good but let see what was the matchups with Bal...

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1570
Posted: #29
Good point football. I forget the matchup tho
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 29723
Posted: #30
Ok. It was T.Wakefield vs Bergesen then...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17423
Posted: #31
-007 dropping some knowledge..I remember that. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1570
Posted: #32

The twins don't have the O baltimore does, and Baker is better than Berg.

I'm feelin like an 8-6 game tmrw. Still think I'm laying off

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 29723
Posted: #33
Baker is better than Bergesen though so tough one. Let see what the total will be then..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1570
Posted: #34
Also, How many runs did the O's score that sunday if you still have the page up
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 29723
Posted: #35
Bal won 8-3 vs Cle

Ok the total set for tomorrow is 9..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #36
just because it went OVER last time, doesn't mean history will repeat itself......this is a different scenario because Red sox traveled from TB to Balt....this time, Red sox fly from Boston to Minnesota, big difference, I think.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #37
now that the Red Sox won, I think I'll lay 1 unit on Minnesota moneyline, cause Red Sox are acting like they won the WS
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1570
Posted: #38

Quote Originally Posted by SharpBettor1:

just because it went OVER last time, doesn't mean history will repeat itself......this is a different scenario because Red sox traveled from TB to Balt....this time, Red sox fly from Boston to Minnesota, big difference, I think.

We understand that past results don't gaurentee anything. We are looking for slight advantages that will put us in profittable postions.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17423
Posted: #39
Boston lost to Cleveland last Monday 9-6..Total was 10. 

I might take this over.  GL everyone.  Sox just won.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 15378
Posted: #40

Because Boston is going to lose...... But why would Wakefield be any higher ?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by EIGHTYpercent:

We understand that past results don't gaurentee anything. We are looking for slight advantages that will put us in profittable postions.


It doesn't matter how much research you put into it, I'm sure you won a game by tailing someone and that took 1 second.  And there was another time, when you researched a game for 2 hours, and it lost 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #42
yea, I really think Boston will LOSE on Monday
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 29723
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by SharpBettor1:

yea, I really think Boston will LOSE on Monday

Base on what ?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #44
I just see a let-down spot for Boston, while Minnesota needs a "W" really bad, although needing a win really doesn't mean anything.  I just think it's a let-down spot for Boston after beating their arch-rivals, the Yankees
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1570
Posted: #45

Sharpbettor you make no sense. I'm not going to try and talk sense into you, but if you think finding out little bits of valuable information isn't important, why do you bet?

I am up about 15 units this season. and you?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #46
Baker is damn good at home.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #47
everyone who posts on here is up this year!!!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2006
Posts: 6591
Posted: #48
Quote Originally Posted by football_007:

On July 17, 2011 Bos played on Sunday Night Baseball @ TB. Bos won that game 1-0 in 16 innings. They flew to play Bal the next day @ Bal and won 15-10...May be over is good but let see what was the matchups with Bal...



Interesting. But, the Twins definitely play a different type of baseball than the Os. Seems like Boston didn't need any key components of the bullpen in that Oriole game. They probably will need it tomorrow!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1570
Posted: #49

Quote Originally Posted by SharpBettor1:

everyone who posts on here is up this year!!!

Umm. actually every single one of my plays is posted.

Feel free to come into my thread tomorrow and see for yourself

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 2402
Posted: #50
what does the score in the Baltimore and Red Sox game have anything to do with what will happen when the Red Sox play the Twins????
All Forums | MLB Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.