I follow the Warriors pretty pretty closely and go to 10-15 games a year in Oakland.
I see that all Covers is on Warriors plus points after Boston's surprising Clippers loss.Well,I was on Clippers myself yesterday (+8.5 no ML though),but Boston gets it done today.
Last game of Warriors was Phoenix and they won straight up,so its a best spot for everyone to take Warriors when they were hot?
Then you guys will be disappointed.You gotta look at matchups.When Warriors get a big win (like they did against Dallas,then they lost 5-6 straight up and not covered shit until the New Orleans game).Same story today,they will lose by 10+.
Biedrins is back,good news for GSW but heck he wont play 40 mins,maybe just 10.Celtics will dominate the paint and Rondo can definitely deal well with Monte or S Curry.I dont see Boston leaving this one to chance like yesterday,they will take control early and roll.
OTHER LEANS:
LAKERS-PHOENIX OVER
NEW JERSEY+6
GL EVERYONE
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Hey folks
I follow the Warriors pretty pretty closely and go to 10-15 games a year in Oakland.
I see that all Covers is on Warriors plus points after Boston's surprising Clippers loss.Well,I was on Clippers myself yesterday (+8.5 no ML though),but Boston gets it done today.
Last game of Warriors was Phoenix and they won straight up,so its a best spot for everyone to take Warriors when they were hot?
Then you guys will be disappointed.You gotta look at matchups.When Warriors get a big win (like they did against Dallas,then they lost 5-6 straight up and not covered shit until the New Orleans game).Same story today,they will lose by 10+.
Biedrins is back,good news for GSW but heck he wont play 40 mins,maybe just 10.Celtics will dominate the paint and Rondo can definitely deal well with Monte or S Curry.I dont see Boston leaving this one to chance like yesterday,they will take control early and roll.
And not to mention West coast people start bitching when there's just a bit of rain and today its raining cats and dogs here in the bay area so i can see the stadium wont be crowded at all.
0
And not to mention West coast people start bitching when there's just a bit of rain and today its raining cats and dogs here in the bay area so i can see the stadium wont be crowded at all.
i find its interesting in Lak/Phx game over 215. imho this total gets me thinking more than twice.
The Lakers somehow i c them tending to light up performance vs. west coast teams. lets talk matchup wise.
Gasol and Amare should c the lines early and often as these two exceed in other's weakness. (power vs. versatile and skills).
Bynum should be more of a defensive presence than a low post threat bcuz the pace will not favor his style. C. Fry in other words like to put up 3 balls and mid range jumpsots, so i c him productive as Bynum less effective defending outside the paint. In contrast, O rebs and layps favor Lakers center.
Its hard to say Fisher can hold Nash lower to 12 ast
Kobe is now in his own league so not much to say. i predict 27-8-8 stats for him
40-Yr-old Hill's quickness vs. Odom's length and power. I c 28 from these 2
Then we have the bench which Phx should prove they better. Expect 18-25 pts bench contribution from both. This is very competitive game so starters will play more.
And with Artest out, im seeing 221 final, no clue who wins.
0
i find its interesting in Lak/Phx game over 215. imho this total gets me thinking more than twice.
The Lakers somehow i c them tending to light up performance vs. west coast teams. lets talk matchup wise.
Gasol and Amare should c the lines early and often as these two exceed in other's weakness. (power vs. versatile and skills).
Bynum should be more of a defensive presence than a low post threat bcuz the pace will not favor his style. C. Fry in other words like to put up 3 balls and mid range jumpsots, so i c him productive as Bynum less effective defending outside the paint. In contrast, O rebs and layps favor Lakers center.
Its hard to say Fisher can hold Nash lower to 12 ast
Kobe is now in his own league so not much to say. i predict 27-8-8 stats for him
40-Yr-old Hill's quickness vs. Odom's length and power. I c 28 from these 2
Then we have the bench which Phx should prove they better. Expect 18-25 pts bench contribution from both. This is very competitive game so starters will play more.
And with Artest out, im seeing 221 final, no clue who wins.
Hey im from the SF bay area also and i can tell u as a warriors fan, that the warriors ALWAYS get up for Good teams. Its the bad teams that we have trouble with...Dont tell me GSW isnt going to be up for this game with Biedrins back in the lineup. He may only play 10 minutes but his presence will be a huge morale boost (Like Turiaf for the Phoenix game) GSW is at home, very motivated to get another good win and i look for a close game down to the wire....Garnett is banged up and Boston is not the same team without Pierce...
0
Hey im from the SF bay area also and i can tell u as a warriors fan, that the warriors ALWAYS get up for Good teams. Its the bad teams that we have trouble with...Dont tell me GSW isnt going to be up for this game with Biedrins back in the lineup. He may only play 10 minutes but his presence will be a huge morale boost (Like Turiaf for the Phoenix game) GSW is at home, very motivated to get another good win and i look for a close game down to the wire....Garnett is banged up and Boston is not the same team without Pierce...
Plus dont think Biedrins will fight 40 minutes in the paint,he's just back from big injury.He will play for a few minutes just to sweat.Nash was slow against Ellis and S.Curry and nash is not known to be good defender but that FT retarded Rajon Rondo is quick and he can defend,steal.
0
Hi G128
boston always won by more than 10 in Oakland G128
Plus dont think Biedrins will fight 40 minutes in the paint,he's just back from big injury.He will play for a few minutes just to sweat.Nash was slow against Ellis and S.Curry and nash is not known to be good defender but that FT retarded Rajon Rondo is quick and he can defend,steal.
Tend to agree w ya elsewhere and say that celts handle the warriors...good reasoning you already stated and I have to fade teams mixing minutes w a returning starter for first game...usually money...GL all
0
Tend to agree w ya elsewhere and say that celts handle the warriors...good reasoning you already stated and I have to fade teams mixing minutes w a returning starter for first game...usually money...GL all
Tend to agree w ya elsewhere and say that celts handle the warriors...good reasoning you already stated and I have to fade teams mixing minutes w a returning starter for first game...usually money...GL all
on point
fade teams with starters back in 1st game back teams with key player(s) out in 1st game
0
Quote Originally Posted by Rauchy76:
Tend to agree w ya elsewhere and say that celts handle the warriors...good reasoning you already stated and I have to fade teams mixing minutes w a returning starter for first game...usually money...GL all
on point
fade teams with starters back in 1st game back teams with key player(s) out in 1st game
When was the last time they won by more than 10 in Oakland? Last five home games vs. Boston are as follows:
12-26-08 Warriors won 99-89
2-20-08 Warriors won 119-117
12-29-06 Warriors won 110-100
12-28-05 Warriors won 111-109
1-5-05 Warriors lost 84-83
Also, you said the arena will not be pumpin as usual?? I live in Oakland and as I look outside, there is no rain at all. And you must be nuts to think it will not be a sell out in the Celtics' only trip to the bay area.
I may be wrong, but Warriors plus the points is the way to go. BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by elsewhere:
Hi G128
boston always won by more than 10 in Oakland G128
When was the last time they won by more than 10 in Oakland? Last five home games vs. Boston are as follows:
12-26-08 Warriors won 99-89
2-20-08 Warriors won 119-117
12-29-06 Warriors won 110-100
12-28-05 Warriors won 111-109
1-5-05 Warriors lost 84-83
Also, you said the arena will not be pumpin as usual?? I live in Oakland and as I look outside, there is no rain at all. And you must be nuts to think it will not be a sell out in the Celtics' only trip to the bay area.
I may be wrong, but Warriors plus the points is the way to go. BOL
When was the last time they won by more than 10 in Oakland? Last five home games vs. Boston are as follows:
12-26-08 Warriors won 99-89
2-20-08 Warriors won 119-117
12-29-06 Warriors won 110-100
12-28-05 Warriors won 111-109
1-5-05 Warriors lost 84-83
Also, you said the arena will not be pumpin as usual?? I live in Oakland and as I look outside, there is no rain at all. And you must be nuts to think it will not be a sell out in the Celtics' only trip to the bay area.
I may be wrong, but Warriors plus the points is the way to go. BOL
boston with a nice start
24-11 with 2 mins remaining,tell me how many other teams keep warriors with less than 20 pts in a 1st quarter
0
Quote Originally Posted by IWANTWINNERS:
When was the last time they won by more than 10 in Oakland? Last five home games vs. Boston are as follows:
12-26-08 Warriors won 99-89
2-20-08 Warriors won 119-117
12-29-06 Warriors won 110-100
12-28-05 Warriors won 111-109
1-5-05 Warriors lost 84-83
Also, you said the arena will not be pumpin as usual?? I live in Oakland and as I look outside, there is no rain at all. And you must be nuts to think it will not be a sell out in the Celtics' only trip to the bay area.
I may be wrong, but Warriors plus the points is the way to go. BOL
boston with a nice start
24-11 with 2 mins remaining,tell me how many other teams keep warriors with less than 20 pts in a 1st quarter
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.