This makes absolutely no sense. I saw the same thing happen when Indiana was -3 at Detroit on Saturday. Am I missing something? Is someone injured I don;t know about?
GSW is arguably Top 3 team in the NBA, and Sac is Bottom 3. SO WHAT if, in the 4th game of the season, GSW lost @ SAC by three. The Warrior's didn't know who they were yet... frankly no team does four games in. But now that the dust has settled and the caliber and hierarchy of the teams is known, this line makes absolutely no sense.
Just as Toronto, one of the the shit hottest teams in the NBA coming off victories over the Rockets, Mavs, and newly improves Cavs, is only laying three at home to another bottom three team, the Pistons.
Someone PLEASE chime in on the Warriors (and Raps if you want) before I met my farm. Clearly the public is behind this logic with 89% on Warrior. Thanks all.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
This makes absolutely no sense. I saw the same thing happen when Indiana was -3 at Detroit on Saturday. Am I missing something? Is someone injured I don;t know about?
GSW is arguably Top 3 team in the NBA, and Sac is Bottom 3. SO WHAT if, in the 4th game of the season, GSW lost @ SAC by three. The Warrior's didn't know who they were yet... frankly no team does four games in. But now that the dust has settled and the caliber and hierarchy of the teams is known, this line makes absolutely no sense.
Just as Toronto, one of the the shit hottest teams in the NBA coming off victories over the Rockets, Mavs, and newly improves Cavs, is only laying three at home to another bottom three team, the Pistons.
Someone PLEASE chime in on the Warriors (and Raps if you want) before I met my farm. Clearly the public is behind this logic with 89% on Warrior. Thanks all.
I like GSW. But this'll be a hard one for me to lock cause its weird how GSW can beat a team like heat, but lose to magics twice, but magics have been doing good. Also, GSW are basically playing at home also, cause I'm sure there will be an even amount of kings and warriors fan since its in the bay. I really like GSW but yeah, I definitely also need an explanation as to why it's only -3...
0
I like GSW. But this'll be a hard one for me to lock cause its weird how GSW can beat a team like heat, but lose to magics twice, but magics have been doing good. Also, GSW are basically playing at home also, cause I'm sure there will be an even amount of kings and warriors fan since its in the bay. I really like GSW but yeah, I definitely also need an explanation as to why it's only -3...
Warriors just played yesterday and have a short travel to Sacramento. Only reason I can see this line being so low is that they just played and the Kings are familiar with the Warriors.
That being said that will not be enough.
Enjoy the easy pick and just take the WArriors -3
0
Warriors just played yesterday and have a short travel to Sacramento. Only reason I can see this line being so low is that they just played and the Kings are familiar with the Warriors.
Then let's move aside the Raptors for a second and discuss Warriors... bring your logic to that one and tell me why we are -3 on, what is in essence, a home game against the worst team in the NBA.
0
Then let's move aside the Raptors for a second and discuss Warriors... bring your logic to that one and tell me why we are -3 on, what is in essence, a home game against the worst team in the NBA.
If the linemakers put Warriors as -6-7 favorite, the more people would bet than when the odds are warriors -3.
When the odds are -3, we as a public approaching that something doggy fishy etc...away games only makes -3 handicap as all you know, if it is neutral games then odds will be 50/50 shared which is silly.
Public is 77% at Warriors.
If it is revenge factor, Warriors must win situation
golden next game is 2 days after at home game with Charlette
Everything is favour of Golden.
0
If the linemakers put Warriors as -6-7 favorite, the more people would bet than when the odds are warriors -3.
When the odds are -3, we as a public approaching that something doggy fishy etc...away games only makes -3 handicap as all you know, if it is neutral games then odds will be 50/50 shared which is silly.
Public is 77% at Warriors.
If it is revenge factor, Warriors must win situation
golden next game is 2 days after at home game with Charlette
If the linemakers put Warriors as -6-7 favorite, the more people would bet than when the odds are warriors -3.
When the odds are -3, we as a public approaching that something doggy fishy etc...away games only makes -3 handicap as all you know, if it is neutral games then odds will be 50/50 shared which is silly.
Public is 77% at Warriors.
If it is revenge factor, Warriors must win situation
golden next game is 2 days after at home game with Charlette
Everything is favour of Golden.
public couldn't even smell their own behind if they garbage themselves.....get outta here
0
Quote Originally Posted by victorerk:
If the linemakers put Warriors as -6-7 favorite, the more people would bet than when the odds are warriors -3.
When the odds are -3, we as a public approaching that something doggy fishy etc...away games only makes -3 handicap as all you know, if it is neutral games then odds will be 50/50 shared which is silly.
Public is 77% at Warriors.
If it is revenge factor, Warriors must win situation
golden next game is 2 days after at home game with Charlette
Everything is favour of Golden.
public couldn't even smell their own behind if they garbage themselves.....get outta here
The logic of "well if 90% of the public are betting one way, its problem wrong" is utterly asinine. Until you should me some for of regression analysis with a high R proving a correlation between high public favorites and losses, then I'm going to ignore that concept wholeheartedly.
0
The logic of "well if 90% of the public are betting one way, its problem wrong" is utterly asinine. Until you should me some for of regression analysis with a high R proving a correlation between high public favorites and losses, then I'm going to ignore that concept wholeheartedly.
The logic of "well if 90% of the public are betting one way, its problem wrong" is utterly asinine. Until you should me some for of regression analysis with a high R proving a correlation between high public favorites and losses, then I'm going to ignore that concept wholeheartedly.
if you paid attention to highly consensus bets daily and winners you would see the trend.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartkuz:
The logic of "well if 90% of the public are betting one way, its problem wrong" is utterly asinine. Until you should me some for of regression analysis with a high R proving a correlation between high public favorites and losses, then I'm going to ignore that concept wholeheartedly.
if you paid attention to highly consensus bets daily and winners you would see the trend.
I would stay off this game - for whatever reason line is not budging despite the fact most people love GSW (including myself). However I am not going to be a part of this fiasco.
These types of games can be the most dangerous to bet on because people feel like they can put more $ on GSW at such a low line and think it is a steal.
I would definitely keep my eyes on to see what happens in this one - We all know the books could've made GSW -5.5 and it would still get about the same amount of action.
0
I would stay off this game - for whatever reason line is not budging despite the fact most people love GSW (including myself). However I am not going to be a part of this fiasco.
These types of games can be the most dangerous to bet on because people feel like they can put more $ on GSW at such a low line and think it is a steal.
I would definitely keep my eyes on to see what happens in this one - We all know the books could've made GSW -5.5 and it would still get about the same amount of action.
That is conjecture. You can't say that without actual tracking and data that proves your point. Your idea is no more valid than me saying "highly favored bets win". So let's remove conjecture and look at the facts.
- Virtually a home game - Hottest team in NBA vs. Worst - Tyreke Evans is hurt, may not play, and may get traded to the Celtics so he will probably be benched - Line is (-3) and should be (-8) at least
That's it... unless you have anything to counter the obvious, we will wait and see. BOL to you sir.
0
That is conjecture. You can't say that without actual tracking and data that proves your point. Your idea is no more valid than me saying "highly favored bets win". So let's remove conjecture and look at the facts.
- Virtually a home game - Hottest team in NBA vs. Worst - Tyreke Evans is hurt, may not play, and may get traded to the Celtics so he will probably be benched - Line is (-3) and should be (-8) at least
That's it... unless you have anything to counter the obvious, we will wait and see. BOL to you sir.
Basically from what I've read from the Chronicle and the Bee is that it should be a very intense game with GSW coming off the B2B (as they have not performed that well on the 2nd leg) and it somewhat justifies the low line. In addition you have some of the Dubs that may get fatigued.
I'm almost leaning the opposite way now.
0
Basically from what I've read from the Chronicle and the Bee is that it should be a very intense game with GSW coming off the B2B (as they have not performed that well on the 2nd leg) and it somewhat justifies the low line. In addition you have some of the Dubs that may get fatigued.
"One of the hardest games in the NBA to play is your first game back at home after a road trip," forward David Lee said after scoring 26 points with nine rebounds. "I've been through too much losing to be disappointed in a win."
These guys really get it now... very self aware and are fighting for every win.
0
Great quote from Lee:
"One of the hardest games in the NBA to play is your first game back at home after a road trip," forward David Lee said after scoring 26 points with nine rebounds. "I've been through too much losing to be disappointed in a win."
These guys really get it now... very self aware and are fighting for every win.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.