y you so defensive? your opinions are fact others are not? I understand its is your thread it is an open forum somebody disagrees with you or disputes you you get pissy with them hey i like reading your stuff people present material whether it be useful or not and if it is not to your liking its wrong or not right kind of like the kid who says if i can't play quarterback i am taking my ball home we are here for same reasons
Not getting pist off man
All I am saying is that after having seen both careers (one yet unfinished), and having the web as a resource to find out everything about a player and how they interacted with their team, LBJ wins out. You can take MJ. I'm taking LBJ. You'll come around. You'll see. It will just take time.
The big turnoff is ESPN (the square's square network) lauding him day in, day out.
But remember, they gave MJ the athlete of the century award over BABE RUTH. This is what they do.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scooby-doos:
y you so defensive? your opinions are fact others are not? I understand its is your thread it is an open forum somebody disagrees with you or disputes you you get pissy with them hey i like reading your stuff people present material whether it be useful or not and if it is not to your liking its wrong or not right kind of like the kid who says if i can't play quarterback i am taking my ball home we are here for same reasons
Not getting pist off man
All I am saying is that after having seen both careers (one yet unfinished), and having the web as a resource to find out everything about a player and how they interacted with their team, LBJ wins out. You can take MJ. I'm taking LBJ. You'll come around. You'll see. It will just take time.
The big turnoff is ESPN (the square's square network) lauding him day in, day out.
But remember, they gave MJ the athlete of the century award over BABE RUTH. This is what they do.
Well scal, one thing for sure, one of us is going to WIN game #1
on the other side with this matchup....
enjoy the game
Sports after reading all that.
I hope you have a WHOPPER of a reason, make that an entire GRILL of WHOPPERS, to take the Cavs. Because I went deeper into the mineshaft than Geraldo Rivera did to Al Capone's tomb for this one.
And if you just come away saying "Well, I'll take Lebron", that is not enough , because that same guy and the Cavs KILLED bettors with a 5-10 ATS run to end the season and a 3-8 ATS record to begin the season.
How soon we forget!
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
Well scal, one thing for sure, one of us is going to WIN game #1
on the other side with this matchup....
enjoy the game
Sports after reading all that.
I hope you have a WHOPPER of a reason, make that an entire GRILL of WHOPPERS, to take the Cavs. Because I went deeper into the mineshaft than Geraldo Rivera did to Al Capone's tomb for this one.
And if you just come away saying "Well, I'll take Lebron", that is not enough , because that same guy and the Cavs KILLED bettors with a 5-10 ATS run to end the season and a 3-8 ATS record to begin the season.
love the write up Scal but disagree on the live betting input. There has been countless times where a team will start slow and you get a much better line than the opening line. However, it takes discipline (not continuing to second guess yourself) to know when the team you wanted to bet on starts hot and stays hot that you missed your opportunity and just walk away ( i.e. game 4 for all the Celtics backers). But, when you see opportunities like Boston vs Texas (MLB) when the Rangers were up 3-1 and you know it was only a matter of time I was able to absolutely hammer the Sox and the result was a 9-4 Bo Sox win
I can give you COUNTLESS examples anecdotally where the bettor was completely screwed, through live-betting.
Live-betting has it's opportunities.
I can honestly say the nights the Knicks and Nets are ON and you know they are ON, I find myself RUNNING to the laptop to hammer them live. And you know they are on by the way they come out.
But I've also seen so many teams come out strong and die right in front of me.
Live betting is the casinos best friend. It feeds into every gamblers degeneracy, actually the worst aspect of it, treating a sports bet like a slot machine.
And we all know what slots do. They take everything. My biggest losses ever have come through live-betting. I really don't use it much anymore and that has been to be benefit. And I've been doing this since the 4th grade.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
love the write up Scal but disagree on the live betting input. There has been countless times where a team will start slow and you get a much better line than the opening line. However, it takes discipline (not continuing to second guess yourself) to know when the team you wanted to bet on starts hot and stays hot that you missed your opportunity and just walk away ( i.e. game 4 for all the Celtics backers). But, when you see opportunities like Boston vs Texas (MLB) when the Rangers were up 3-1 and you know it was only a matter of time I was able to absolutely hammer the Sox and the result was a 9-4 Bo Sox win
I can give you COUNTLESS examples anecdotally where the bettor was completely screwed, through live-betting.
Live-betting has it's opportunities.
I can honestly say the nights the Knicks and Nets are ON and you know they are ON, I find myself RUNNING to the laptop to hammer them live. And you know they are on by the way they come out.
But I've also seen so many teams come out strong and die right in front of me.
Live betting is the casinos best friend. It feeds into every gamblers degeneracy, actually the worst aspect of it, treating a sports bet like a slot machine.
And we all know what slots do. They take everything. My biggest losses ever have come through live-betting. I really don't use it much anymore and that has been to be benefit. And I've been doing this since the 4th grade.
social media sucks mj with this would not be pretty i are with you everything being scrutinized my knicks suck just getting tired i guess of media forcing people down my throat miss the old school players in general i am old enjoy your weekend
0
social media sucks mj with this would not be pretty i are with you everything being scrutinized my knicks suck just getting tired i guess of media forcing people down my throat miss the old school players in general i am old enjoy your weekend
I can give you COUNTLESS examples anecdotally where the bettor was completely screwed, through live-betting.
Live-betting has it's opportunities.
I can honestly say the nights the Knicks and Nets are ON and you know they are ON, I find myself RUNNING to the laptop to hammer them live. And you know they are on by the way they come out.
But I've also seen so many teams come out strong and die right in front of me.
Live betting is the casinos best friend. It feeds into every gamblers degeneracy, actually the worst aspect of it, treating a sports bet like a slot machine.
And we all know what slots do. They take everything. My biggest losses ever have come through live-betting. I really don't use it much anymore and that has been to be benefit. And I've been doing this since the 4th grade.
wow! you handicapped a game, and made a bet at age 9.
that's interesting
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
I can give you COUNTLESS examples anecdotally where the bettor was completely screwed, through live-betting.
Live-betting has it's opportunities.
I can honestly say the nights the Knicks and Nets are ON and you know they are ON, I find myself RUNNING to the laptop to hammer them live. And you know they are on by the way they come out.
But I've also seen so many teams come out strong and die right in front of me.
Live betting is the casinos best friend. It feeds into every gamblers degeneracy, actually the worst aspect of it, treating a sports bet like a slot machine.
And we all know what slots do. They take everything. My biggest losses ever have come through live-betting. I really don't use it much anymore and that has been to be benefit. And I've been doing this since the 4th grade.
wow! you handicapped a game, and made a bet at age 9.
wow! you handicapped a game, and made a bet at age 9.
that's interesting
It's an argument against in-game betting. Take it as you will. It requires spontaneous capping. That is exactly what the books want.
And making a bet at age 9 means I've been capping far longer than most here, including yourself.
Now I gave you ONE DOZEN reason to take the Warriors all explained down to the finest detail.
And you came away with "I'm on the Cavs."
I tried to help ya. For free. For nothing. Not a single penny required. Just your eyeballs. Now you are going to lose. This is your last warning. You can still turn back.
0
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
wow! you handicapped a game, and made a bet at age 9.
that's interesting
It's an argument against in-game betting. Take it as you will. It requires spontaneous capping. That is exactly what the books want.
And making a bet at age 9 means I've been capping far longer than most here, including yourself.
Now I gave you ONE DOZEN reason to take the Warriors all explained down to the finest detail.
And you came away with "I'm on the Cavs."
I tried to help ya. For free. For nothing. Not a single penny required. Just your eyeballs. Now you are going to lose. This is your last warning. You can still turn back.
I'll be rooting for Warriors game one since I'll be on them one way or another but hope Cavs win the series. What that sleazebag coward Durant did was reprehensible. I hope he not only loses but breaks his leg.
I do think Warriors win the series.
You hope he breaks his leg because he did something to better his life and career? You must really hate life. I feel bad for you.
0
Quote Originally Posted by airjordans:
I'll be rooting for Warriors game one since I'll be on them one way or another but hope Cavs win the series. What that sleazebag coward Durant did was reprehensible. I hope he not only loses but breaks his leg.
I do think Warriors win the series.
You hope he breaks his leg because he did something to better his life and career? You must really hate life. I feel bad for you.
I stopped reading at ''This is a very important game. As a capper, you should be betting this game. This literally is a once in a lifetime opportunity''
No way is this a once in a lifetime setup. Cavs can maybe upset to make it a great series start and I am sure the public will be all over the golden state. Remember how the Warriors started out against the spurs. It could happen again.
Having a finals match-up in where the same team is on its third match-up is unprecedented in NBA history I a venture to say it will never happen again as long as I live.
That makes it unique to this lifetime.
So what don't you understand about that.
Of course it can happen. Thanks for noting that. How is that a legitimate counter to what I said????
0
Quote Originally Posted by loserforeverz:
I stopped reading at ''This is a very important game. As a capper, you should be betting this game. This literally is a once in a lifetime opportunity''
No way is this a once in a lifetime setup. Cavs can maybe upset to make it a great series start and I am sure the public will be all over the golden state. Remember how the Warriors started out against the spurs. It could happen again.
Having a finals match-up in where the same team is on its third match-up is unprecedented in NBA history I a venture to say it will never happen again as long as I live.
That makes it unique to this lifetime.
So what don't you understand about that.
Of course it can happen. Thanks for noting that. How is that a legitimate counter to what I said????
Have you ever just posted something like "Taking the Warriors -7 tonight" and ended it?
Remember the movie "Se7en" when Brad Pitt & Morgan Freeman go through Kevin Spacey's dirty, dingy apartment, and pretty much all they find are thousands and thousands of journals chock full of the nonsensical ramblings of a psychopath?
Yeah, that's pretty much what I'm picturing. Just Scal's on a computer now instead of pen & paper.....
Good Luck Buddy!
0
Jesus H. Christ, Scal!
Nobody is going to read all of that!
Have you ever just posted something like "Taking the Warriors -7 tonight" and ended it?
Remember the movie "Se7en" when Brad Pitt & Morgan Freeman go through Kevin Spacey's dirty, dingy apartment, and pretty much all they find are thousands and thousands of journals chock full of the nonsensical ramblings of a psychopath?
Have you ever just posted something like "Taking the Warriors -7 tonight" and ended it?
Remember the movie "Se7en" when Brad Pitt & Morgan Freeman go through Kevin Spacey's dirty, dingy apartment, and pretty much all they find are thousands and thousands of journals chock full of the nonsensical ramblings of a psychopath?
Yeah, that's pretty much what I'm picturing. Just Scal's on a computer now instead of pen & paper.....
Good Luck Buddy!
No, people do read the write-up. A select few, but people do read the entire thing.
Such a strange phenomena to DISCOURAGE lengthy write-ups and communicate as little as possible on a MESSAGE BOARD!?!?
It's been going on since the inception of message boards themselves!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GimmeMoneyNow:
Jesus H. Christ, Scal!
Nobody is going to read all of that!
Have you ever just posted something like "Taking the Warriors -7 tonight" and ended it?
Remember the movie "Se7en" when Brad Pitt & Morgan Freeman go through Kevin Spacey's dirty, dingy apartment, and pretty much all they find are thousands and thousands of journals chock full of the nonsensical ramblings of a psychopath?
''If Jordan played now he would be as hated or more then LeBron. He was a terrible human being just we didn't see it on TMz.''
^
I swear it's as if some people don't think before they express their foolish opinions.
Jordan would NOT be as hated as LeBron or hated at all. Yes he was a jerk but unlike in Kobe or Lebron's case Jordan was EXTREMELY CHARISMATIC AND GOOD LOOKING! What does looks have to do with anything? For the same reason when an ugly kid misbehaves and he's a misbehaving kid, if a good looking kid does it he's a mischievous charming kid.
Mike had an aura about him. Lebron doesn't. Lebron is ugly, he joins superteams, he's generally nowhere as likeable as Jordan. Ever listen to to the great players he robbed of championships back then? Reggie Miller, Patrick Ewing etc, they all talk with great admiration of the guy. They loved to hate him back then so did opposing fans. Whereas in Lebron's case they just hate him.
Jordan was the kind of guy that even if you hate him you secretly think he's awesome. He just had a way about him. Yes looks and charisma are apart of it but also that he was the most intensely competitive guy to ever play in the NBA. Then you have Lebron creating superteams and even then whining..we need more help. What a tool. Still, I'll give Lebron respect for the he did in Cleveland way back when he took them to the finals with a bunch of nobodies. But as far as Jordan would be as hated as Lebron if Jordan played today. That's a joke.
Refs loved Jordan. Fans loved him even opposing fans.
Watch this clip..If you don't get goosebumps looking at this guy then check yourself for a pulse.
https://youtu.be/ThRn_YyB12I
Kobe came close to Jordan but he was a just an imitation. Kobe was awesome and charismatic too but he tried too hard to be like Jordan and it showed. Jordan was just Jordan and there will never be anybody like him again. He was a killer.
I see these threads from these kids pondering outloud who is better, Jordan or Lebron and it makes me snicker at their cluelessness. Jordan dominated in a league when big men were allowed to dominate. Can you imagine what he would do with today's rules? Damn.
Correct, ask Brian Russell or Craig Ehlo.
By the way can you imagine how Kareem would dominate now? How many titles does he have? How many points does he have? DAMN
22nd
0
Quote Originally Posted by airjordans:
''If Jordan played now he would be as hated or more then LeBron. He was a terrible human being just we didn't see it on TMz.''
^
I swear it's as if some people don't think before they express their foolish opinions.
Jordan would NOT be as hated as LeBron or hated at all. Yes he was a jerk but unlike in Kobe or Lebron's case Jordan was EXTREMELY CHARISMATIC AND GOOD LOOKING! What does looks have to do with anything? For the same reason when an ugly kid misbehaves and he's a misbehaving kid, if a good looking kid does it he's a mischievous charming kid.
Mike had an aura about him. Lebron doesn't. Lebron is ugly, he joins superteams, he's generally nowhere as likeable as Jordan. Ever listen to to the great players he robbed of championships back then? Reggie Miller, Patrick Ewing etc, they all talk with great admiration of the guy. They loved to hate him back then so did opposing fans. Whereas in Lebron's case they just hate him.
Jordan was the kind of guy that even if you hate him you secretly think he's awesome. He just had a way about him. Yes looks and charisma are apart of it but also that he was the most intensely competitive guy to ever play in the NBA. Then you have Lebron creating superteams and even then whining..we need more help. What a tool. Still, I'll give Lebron respect for the he did in Cleveland way back when he took them to the finals with a bunch of nobodies. But as far as Jordan would be as hated as Lebron if Jordan played today. That's a joke.
Refs loved Jordan. Fans loved him even opposing fans.
Watch this clip..If you don't get goosebumps looking at this guy then check yourself for a pulse.
https://youtu.be/ThRn_YyB12I
Kobe came close to Jordan but he was a just an imitation. Kobe was awesome and charismatic too but he tried too hard to be like Jordan and it showed. Jordan was just Jordan and there will never be anybody like him again. He was a killer.
I see these threads from these kids pondering outloud who is better, Jordan or Lebron and it makes me snicker at their cluelessness. Jordan dominated in a league when big men were allowed to dominate. Can you imagine what he would do with today's rules? Damn.
Correct, ask Brian Russell or Craig Ehlo.
By the way can you imagine how Kareem would dominate now? How many titles does he have? How many points does he have? DAMN
Scal, apologies that I probably missed this. But who are you on for the series as of now if you don't mind me asking? Thanks.
No series bet. Fading LBJ for the series at almost -300 is not desirable. I'll go game by game. I believe the Warriors win it but wouldn't bet over -175.
Philly Rod
Ben if he played today with the same style he'd be successful but not as massively successful as he was with Milwaukee LA. But of course he'd adapt his game to today too.
Amazingly people don't want the next Kareem. They want the next Curry or Draymond. I don't even put lBJ and MJ in there because they will not be duplicated. And Kobe gets honorable mention.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dallas1987:
Scal, apologies that I probably missed this. But who are you on for the series as of now if you don't mind me asking? Thanks.
No series bet. Fading LBJ for the series at almost -300 is not desirable. I'll go game by game. I believe the Warriors win it but wouldn't bet over -175.
Philly Rod
Ben if he played today with the same style he'd be successful but not as massively successful as he was with Milwaukee LA. But of course he'd adapt his game to today too.
Amazingly people don't want the next Kareem. They want the next Curry or Draymond. I don't even put lBJ and MJ in there because they will not be duplicated. And Kobe gets honorable mention.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.