I think you'll be coming back down to the .500 mark, like you have every season, in every sport you cap, which means at -110, you don't break even.
of course you'll dispute this, despite all of your posts on covers being searchable for anyone wanting to check my assertion.
but mostly. I get tired of the self-serving nature of your threads.
You've said the same thing in 10 of my threads this year and have been wrong 80% of the time and that includes ML hits which reverse the juice heavily in the bettor's favor.
I'll let the posters decide who is right here given that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
you're long winded.
I think the knicks get smoked.
I think they will give up a lot of fouls and put the Grizzlies on the line.
I think you'll be coming back down to the .500 mark, like you have every season, in every sport you cap, which means at -110, you don't break even.
of course you'll dispute this, despite all of your posts on covers being searchable for anyone wanting to check my assertion.
but mostly. I get tired of the self-serving nature of your threads.
You've said the same thing in 10 of my threads this year and have been wrong 80% of the time and that includes ML hits which reverse the juice heavily in the bettor's favor.
I'll let the posters decide who is right here given that.
You've said the same thing in 10 of my threads this year and have been wrong 80% of the time and that includes ML hits which reverse the juice heavily in the bettor's favor.
I'll let the posters decide who is right here given that.
no. the only other thread I said you were wrong where I was wrong is the Yankees game in September.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
You've said the same thing in 10 of my threads this year and have been wrong 80% of the time and that includes ML hits which reverse the juice heavily in the bettor's favor.
I'll let the posters decide who is right here given that.
no. the only other thread I said you were wrong where I was wrong is the Yankees game in September.
hardly a well-capped game. You got very lucky against one of the better relievers in the game.
anyway. keep up the good work.
just wanted to let you know, since you asked if I had anything else to say, that I think here's another case where I think you are wrong. First time I've done it all baskeball season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by henrymethbreath:
no. the only other thread I said you were wrong where I was wrong is the Yankees game in September.
and interestingly, that was a top of the 8th comeback for 4 runs on Steve Delabar.
hardly a well-capped game. You got very lucky against one of the better relievers in the game.
anyway. keep up the good work.
just wanted to let you know, since you asked if I had anything else to say, that I think here's another case where I think you are wrong. First time I've done it all baskeball season.
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
0
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
What the suns are doing blows my mind. I haven't bet against them since game one. I won't let that team burn me again.
0
Quote Originally Posted by stevenp:
Scal: I don't know why people would argue with you. You've more than outlined your position. My lean is Memphis since Gasol is going to play. James Johnson has been John Hollinger's greatest find so far. Plus trading Bayless for Courtney Lee . But your passion and attention to detail wards me off. I'm on phoenix beating the rudderless nuggets. They have no point guard against a super talented point guard. They're playing for pride. Phoenix is playing for the playoffs in one of the best unsung stories since the Baron Davis led Warriors upset the Mavs as an eighth seed. Best of luck.
What the suns are doing blows my mind. I haven't bet against them since game one. I won't let that team burn me again.
I'm saying you're spineless because you come in with non-statistical rubbish using terms like long winded and self serving - show me a thread that isn't self serving! Plainly opposing scal which is fine even if you had no actual arguments. But then you get all buddy buddy with the cheers signs and all. Looks like a major climb down. Hence spineless
0
I'm saying you're spineless because you come in with non-statistical rubbish using terms like long winded and self serving - show me a thread that isn't self serving! Plainly opposing scal which is fine even if you had no actual arguments. But then you get all buddy buddy with the cheers signs and all. Looks like a major climb down. Hence spineless
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.