I'm saying you're spineless because you come in with non-statistical rubbish using terms like long winded and self serving - show me a thread that isn't self serving! Plainly opposing scal which is fine even if you had no actual arguments. But then you get all buddy buddy with the cheers signs and all. Looks like a major climb down. Hence spineless
what?
did you see the sdql I posted?
you can also look at these, and dig stats out of the four factors, as well as a whole load of reffing stats on covers.
Knicks
Offense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%ORB%FT/FGA
Team.49812.525.1.178
Lg Rank1242030
Defense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%ORB%FT/FGA
Team.51414.575.5.254
Lg Rank269930
Grizzlies
Offense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%ORB%FT/FGA
Team.48513.028.1.184
Lg Rank208427
Defense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%DRB%FT/FGA
Team.49613.775.7.203
Lg Rank1515611
a good day to everyone. I'll even be back and admit I was wrong if I am wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Julespussy:
I'm saying you're spineless because you come in with non-statistical rubbish using terms like long winded and self serving - show me a thread that isn't self serving! Plainly opposing scal which is fine even if you had no actual arguments. But then you get all buddy buddy with the cheers signs and all. Looks like a major climb down. Hence spineless
what?
did you see the sdql I posted?
you can also look at these, and dig stats out of the four factors, as well as a whole load of reffing stats on covers.
Knicks
Offense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%ORB%FT/FGA
Team.49812.525.1.178
Lg Rank1242030
Defense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%ORB%FT/FGA
Team.51414.575.5.254
Lg Rank269930
Grizzlies
Offense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%ORB%FT/FGA
Team.48513.028.1.184
Lg Rank208427
Defense Four Factors
PWeFG%TOV%DRB%FT/FGA
Team.49613.775.7.203
Lg Rank1515611
a good day to everyone. I'll even be back and admit I was wrong if I am wrong.
So you posted one of my winners where the Dolphins demolished the Jets, (thanks), a stat I got off a podcast later to be proven wrong and my last Fb thread of the season that missed the spread by 5.5. Interesting...
All I can say is thanks if you are trying to say I can't cap FB!
So you posted one of my winners where the Dolphins demolished the Jets, (thanks), a stat I got off a podcast later to be proven wrong and my last Fb thread of the season that missed the spread by 5.5. Interesting...
All I can say is thanks if you are trying to say I can't cap FB!
I think it's funny how people have to rip on another capper. If you disagree, that's fine but give credit where it's due. Thanks scal for the insight. I've enjoyed reading your posts all season. Bol!
0
I think it's funny how people have to rip on another capper. If you disagree, that's fine but give credit where it's due. Thanks scal for the insight. I've enjoyed reading your posts all season. Bol!
I think it's funny how people have to rip on another capper. If you disagree, that's fine but give credit where it's due. Thanks scal for the insight. I've enjoyed reading your posts all season. Bol!
You'll always have detractors.
He points out that everyone here is deferential to the Knicks side.
So be it. I do the write-ups so their will be little to no counterarguments if not flimsy ones. Hence, most here should support the proposed side given the perspective and research.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Twosy3:
I think it's funny how people have to rip on another capper. If you disagree, that's fine but give credit where it's due. Thanks scal for the insight. I've enjoyed reading your posts all season. Bol!
You'll always have detractors.
He points out that everyone here is deferential to the Knicks side.
So be it. I do the write-ups so their will be little to no counterarguments if not flimsy ones. Hence, most here should support the proposed side given the perspective and research.
True, but so do the Kings and they destroyed a solid Bulls team on their home court.
Plus the Knicks were in an awful stretch and beat the Spurs and Dallas on their floor.
The point? Money can be made off teams that blow, a lot more of it than teams that lay 15 points at home like the pacers which isn't really a bettable game...unless you take the team that blows...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dirkdigs:
nice write-up
I like memphis ML
Knicks BLOW
True, but so do the Kings and they destroyed a solid Bulls team on their home court.
Plus the Knicks were in an awful stretch and beat the Spurs and Dallas on their floor.
The point? Money can be made off teams that blow, a lot more of it than teams that lay 15 points at home like the pacers which isn't really a bettable game...unless you take the team that blows...
He points out that everyone here is deferential to the Knicks side.
So be it. I do the write-ups so their will be little to no counterarguments if not flimsy ones. Hence, most here should support the proposed side given the perspective and research.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
You'll always have detractors.
He points out that everyone here is deferential to the Knicks side.
So be it. I do the write-ups so their will be little to no counterarguments if not flimsy ones. Hence, most here should support the proposed side given the perspective and research.
Definitely a service guy in the industry that makes your plays his "special" higher unit plays. Releases well after you, play your last game on Knicks as well.
0
Definitely a service guy in the industry that makes your plays his "special" higher unit plays. Releases well after you, play your last game on Knicks as well.
Definitely a service guy in the industry that makes your plays his "special" higher unit plays. Releases well after you, play your last game on Knicks as well.
All the better.
This is just take the money out of Vegas' coffers and punish the books with cappers who know a team or two far better than they or any database could...
0
Quote Originally Posted by gofish3:
Definitely a service guy in the industry that makes your plays his "special" higher unit plays. Releases well after you, play your last game on Knicks as well.
All the better.
This is just take the money out of Vegas' coffers and punish the books with cappers who know a team or two far better than they or any database could...
it makes me realize how much thought should go into a play in order to risk money. my thought on tonight is ty lawson is out and denver has no point guards. is that too simple? perhaps.
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Today was a good day...
it makes me realize how much thought should go into a play in order to risk money. my thought on tonight is ty lawson is out and denver has no point guards. is that too simple? perhaps.
All I can say is thanks if you are trying to say I can't cap FB!
Scalabrine I much prefer your style of capping as opposed to some (Henrymybadbreath) who post 9 or 10 plays a night. That is a 'poor-man's' method to say the least.
I'm out!
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
All I can say is thanks if you are trying to say I can't cap FB!
Scalabrine I much prefer your style of capping as opposed to some (Henrymybadbreath) who post 9 or 10 plays a night. That is a 'poor-man's' method to say the least.
Like a tumor on a scrotum, this troglodyte is attached to my threads. He mentions the Portland game and then fails to mention I've gone 8-1 since.
It's for posters like this that I have to appear 'self-serving' and post my record as I did in this one.
And he forgets to mention how right you were about Portland (and who could have seen the Suns being so good) and didn't Portland cover like 12 out of their next 15 games?
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Like a tumor on a scrotum, this troglodyte is attached to my threads. He mentions the Portland game and then fails to mention I've gone 8-1 since.
It's for posters like this that I have to appear 'self-serving' and post my record as I did in this one.
And he forgets to mention how right you were about Portland (and who could have seen the Suns being so good) and didn't Portland cover like 12 out of their next 15 games?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.