Interesting read about link between sleep and performance

been trolling for a while. thought i would give posting a try. found this thread really interesting. all past lines i pulled from vegasinsiders. 

1 star games we are 4-3 ATS. 2 and 3 star games we are 3-0 ATS. I know the fact that 1 star games are more 50-50 and the 2 and 3 star seem more legit has been posted already. I'm more concerned with the game totals. 

in 1 star games we are 5-2 on the under. one of the misses is an absurdly low 178 line (actual game total only hit 182). 

in 2 and 3 star games we are 3-0 on the over. 

i know super small sample size but here's my spin on how the numbers could correlate to something real.

in 1 star games our teams are only moderately fatigued. they realize they are not at 100% but still have the energy to play some D. if they get in a track meet they are likely toast and try to keep the game at a comfortable speed. 

in 2 and 3 star games our teams are gassed. these are games nobody expects them to win, let alone cover. mindset is going to be more on the side of we have nothing to lose. mental lapses lead to giving up easy buckets which runs the score up.

the last 2 paragraphs are just me spit balling. not sure how much weight that holds but makes sense in my head. 

sooo how are we calculating this MAH factor? i would like to go back a couple of seasons and see how well these trends hold up. if whoever knows how to calculate can post a list of games like they did for this season with the stars i'll go back and see how we do ATS and O/U. if you don't want to make the list of games just teach me how to calculate and i can do that as well. 

will be going memphis/under and detroit/over today. here's to hoping small sample sizes mean anything