Im with you!!! I know its out there some where but does anybody have the stat for teams playing in Den on B2B I would bet money that its a losing record
0
Im with you!!! I know its out there some where but does anybody have the stat for teams playing in Den on B2B I would bet money that its a losing record
lol if this poster knew anything about the clippers, he would go look back from nov 28 to dec 30th of 2012 and look at the 12-0-0 ATS (it could be 15 i dont remember off top of my head) they rattled off during a 17 game winning streak.. And look at those lines.. And then he'll be like WOW theres no way...Just like hes saying tonight.. This is good for us clippers backers though, we need people like him who believe in "its too good to be true" that way some money gets put on denver so the books dont raise our clippers line!!!
0
lol if this poster knew anything about the clippers, he would go look back from nov 28 to dec 30th of 2012 and look at the 12-0-0 ATS (it could be 15 i dont remember off top of my head) they rattled off during a 17 game winning streak.. And look at those lines.. And then he'll be like WOW theres no way...Just like hes saying tonight.. This is good for us clippers backers though, we need people like him who believe in "its too good to be true" that way some money gets put on denver so the books dont raise our clippers line!!!
12-5 ATS during 17 games... Here were non playoffs teams with spreads under -6 On the Road
@MILUAKEE -5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY"" NOT 111-85 crushed them
@DET -6.5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY" NOT CRUSHED THEM 88-76
@PHX -6.5 "BUT ITS TOO EASY" THINK AGAIN 103-77
There were only 2 games (both in utah) Which the clippers played a non playoff team and FAILED to cover ATS (BUT THEY WON OUTRIGHT, as -3 and -2) Therefore THE ML is a 100% LOCK TONIGHT ON CLIPPERS
0
12-5 ATS during 17 games... Here were non playoffs teams with spreads under -6 On the Road
@MILUAKEE -5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY"" NOT 111-85 crushed them
@DET -6.5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY" NOT CRUSHED THEM 88-76
@PHX -6.5 "BUT ITS TOO EASY" THINK AGAIN 103-77
There were only 2 games (both in utah) Which the clippers played a non playoff team and FAILED to cover ATS (BUT THEY WON OUTRIGHT, as -3 and -2) Therefore THE ML is a 100% LOCK TONIGHT ON CLIPPERS
12-5 ATS during 17 games... Here were non playoffs teams with spreads under -6 On the Road
@MILUAKEE -5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY"" NOT 111-85 crushed them
@DET -6.5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY" NOT CRUSHED THEM 88-76
@PHX -6.5 "BUT ITS TOO EASY" THINK AGAIN 103-77
There were only 2 games (both in utah) Which the clippers played a non playoff team and FAILED to cover ATS (BUT THEY WON OUTRIGHT, as -3 and -2) Therefore THE ML is a 100% LOCK TONIGHT ON CLIPPERS
you were already doubting your own play by throwing so many stats. don't be such a square. you have been gambling for awhile now
nice hit slick bol tomorrow
0
Quote Originally Posted by Thel3g1t0ne:
12-5 ATS during 17 games... Here were non playoffs teams with spreads under -6 On the Road
@MILUAKEE -5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY"" NOT 111-85 crushed them
@DET -6.5 "IT MUST BE TOO EASY" NOT CRUSHED THEM 88-76
@PHX -6.5 "BUT ITS TOO EASY" THINK AGAIN 103-77
There were only 2 games (both in utah) Which the clippers played a non playoff team and FAILED to cover ATS (BUT THEY WON OUTRIGHT, as -3 and -2) Therefore THE ML is a 100% LOCK TONIGHT ON CLIPPERS
you were already doubting your own play by throwing so many stats. don't be such a square. you have been gambling for awhile now
On a hindsight though, the line is inflated. I would give it it 2 points tops to clips. 4 pts were a bit high. Mainly because of the win streak of the clips and the books adjusting because they always get hit by square clipper bettors.
0
On a hindsight though, the line is inflated. I would give it it 2 points tops to clips. 4 pts were a bit high. Mainly because of the win streak of the clips and the books adjusting because they always get hit by square clipper bettors.
On a hindsight though, the line is inflated. I would give it it 2 points tops to clips. 4 pts were a bit high. Mainly because of the win streak of the clips and the books adjusting because they always get hit by square clipper bettors.
agreed. line should be Nuggets +2 or +3 tops.
pounded it when I saw Pinnacle lowered it down to +4.
It is tough to win that book, they do not give free money away.
over 60% of bettors had the Clippers and the line goes down. Give me the Nuggets
0
Quote Originally Posted by TsikenBreast:
On a hindsight though, the line is inflated. I would give it it 2 points tops to clips. 4 pts were a bit high. Mainly because of the win streak of the clips and the books adjusting because they always get hit by square clipper bettors.
agreed. line should be Nuggets +2 or +3 tops.
pounded it when I saw Pinnacle lowered it down to +4.
It is tough to win that book, they do not give free money away.
over 60% of bettors had the Clippers and the line goes down. Give me the Nuggets
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.