All Forums | NBA Betting

NBA Releases Statement On Dallas Game....

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1005
Posts: 29
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #1
Said they MISSED the foul at the end of the game.


Just no excuse. And not sour grapes. I had the over which was posted on here.



 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 20749
Posted: #2
Maybe Cuban's fine wont be so large.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 40843
Posted: #3
Quote Originally Posted by Cavs_Lover:

Said they MISSED the foul at the end of the game.


Just no excuse. And not sour grapes. I had the over which was posted on here.



the Association always got away with that BS, every time they blew a rigged one they always got away. Caution: buyer be aware.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #4
What I'd like to see more on Covers is threads BEFORE a game stating which side could be a benefit of a potential fix instead of all the postgame crying.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1065
Posted: #5
wtf...i thought they had the best REPLAY system ever!
 
 
 
nba blew this 1
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 40843
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by Cavs_Lover:

What I'd like to see more on Covers is threads BEFORE a game stating which side could be a benefit of a potential fix instead of all the postgame crying.

just don't complain a "fix" or blown call yourself if you think there is one against you, you will get one and more. Be alert.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #7
I NEVER call fixes and rarely blame the refs for losing a game.


 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 40843
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by Cavs_Lover:

I NEVER call fixes and rarely blame the refs for losing a game.


Great! And please keep that NEVER forever.  

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #9
Don't worry. I know fixes have happened and will again but not nearly as much as people believe. And I will never claim one. In fact, I'm a Seahawks fan and I don't even blame the refs for that Superbowl loss! I think they got screwed but still had enough legitimate chances to win the game and they didn't.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 4625
Posted: #10
why didnt they review it and rule the win? it cost the dallas the playoffs.. must be absolute sickening to get that slap in the face.. but some 1 point 2 or three pointer they easily review.. currupt fuckers.. had denver +4.5 so win either way.. but it wasnt fair do mavs..
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #11
You can't review a play like a foul/no foul call.





 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2003
Posts: 40843
Posted: #12
i had Steelers for that game, and i feel it for you. i saw a couple of blown calls and questionable judgements by the refs in favor of Steelers. Some time i just have to tell myself, what the f** I still bet the sports which i think it is rigged.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 4625
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by Cavs_Lover:

You can't review a play like a foul/no foul call.





 

obviously.. but the reviewed it after the game and concluded it was a bad call.. why didnt they give dallas the win? they reviewed kobes flagrant or some shit after game and gave him that..

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by ashdogs:

 

obviously.. but the reviewed it after the game and concluded it was a bad call.. why didnt they give dallas the win? they reviewed kobes flagrant or some shit after game and gave him that..



Are you kidding me???

Is this your 1st year watching the NBA??

You can't just give a team a win after the fact. If they called the foul they still get the ball out of bounds and the same thing could have happened. We will never know because it was never called. A flagrant foul and a game result reviewed after the fact are 2 totally different situations.


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 4625
Posted: #15
thanks for clreaing that up for me..
 
all i say is unjustice have been done so should they fix the rules so they can rewiev a play? like the hawkeye in tennis* or something like that so game loosing errors from the refs costing teams games?
 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 686
Posted: #16
in one word:


NO
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1110
Posted: #17
Everybody knew Dallas would foul.  But if they were going to foul, bearhug Melo.  Stop him from getting up a shot.  Wright shouldve fouled Melo when he lost the handle.
 
Wright fouled him and put his hands up like he didnt do anything wrong.  Come on, give me a break.  If your going to foul him, FOUL him.  Sure, they missed a call, but shit happens.  Happens in all professional sports.  Don't rely on the refs.  Sucks that they are down 0-3.  But IMO, it wouldn't have mattered.  Dallas is clearly overmatched.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1110
Posted: #18
Furthermore, Dirk and J Kidd was the first ones to go into the locker room.  Their leaders knew they have no shot.  Their leaders knew it should've have come to a situation where they should worry about one call.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 4625
Posted: #19
its was clearly a foul.. itsnt not like theyr suppose to miss next game for a flagrant is there?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2198
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by c12ack:

Furthermore, Dirk and J Kidd was the first ones to go into the locker room.  Their leaders knew they have no shot.  Their leaders knew it should've have come to a situation where they should worry about one call.

Yeah cause game dont come down to a last posession EVER......STFU.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 1110
Posted: #21
Hoops,
 
Did I say EVER? It wasn't like the Mavs were behind looking for a last shot.  They were winning.  They didn't even have to give the last "foul to give."  D up and make Melo shoot a tough shot.
 
Stop   or being .  Whether your a diehard Mavs fan or you lost money.
 
Ash,
 
Clearly a foul?  Sure.  But like I said, foul him.  Why did he just put his hands up?  Why wait for the whistle to blow.  He shouldve still defended the shot.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 2198
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by c12ack:

Hoops,
 
Did I say EVER? It wasn't like the Mavs were behind looking for a last shot.  They were winning.  They didn't even have to give the last "foul to give."  D up and make Melo shoot a tough shot.
 
Stop   or being .  Whether your a diehard Mavs fan or you lost money.
 
Ash,
 
Clearly a foul?  Sure.  But like I said, foul him.  Why did he just put his hands up?  Why wait for the whistle to blow.  He shouldve still defended the shot.

OK

1. HE BUMPED HIM...........FOUL

2. HE HIT HIM............FOUL 2

WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT.

THE LEADERS LEFT THE FLOOR CAUSE THEY KNEW THEY GOT FUCKED AND LIKE HOWARD HAD TO BE HELD BACK BY HIS TEAMMATES FROM KILLING THE REF.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 4625
Posted: #23
youre right c12ack.. there was a foul.. they never blew.. mavs should have won the game outright.. he should have kept on defending him.. i had the over and denver +4.5 regardles.. i just think it stink regardless because they were sucked out on an important win.. i dont care about mavs or fan in any way.. just saying.. goodnight .. maybe they should make up some rules tho about shit like this..
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 3888
Posted: #24
[Quote: Originally Posted by Cavs_Lover] You can't review a play like a foul/no foul call.


 
this is true....if the nba really needed that to be a foul before the shot they would've had an officials conference....there is always an NBA official, i mean lvsc consultant in the stands designated for such situations...
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 3888
Posted: #25
"lvsc associate"
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.