Sorry Ixorv I didn't want to offend you and I know that with good money menagment that 50+ % can be big $$.
I have just went to see your picks and try to figure out how your system works because you mentioned here bigger procentage then @Calculationer's and I think he is doing really great job.
Now when I got explanation on your system I am aware of way you are playing, I have say that is not usable for me because I am half world away, so most of the game are 2-3 am.
Good luck.
no offense taken. i think you misunderstood me, i also think that calc is doing something good here and once HE tweeks a few things to HIS liking, HE will find that 58% is a little low for what HE is doing.
0
Quote Originally Posted by fulcrum:
Sorry Ixorv I didn't want to offend you and I know that with good money menagment that 50+ % can be big $$.
I have just went to see your picks and try to figure out how your system works because you mentioned here bigger procentage then @Calculationer's and I think he is doing really great job.
Now when I got explanation on your system I am aware of way you are playing, I have say that is not usable for me because I am half world away, so most of the game are 2-3 am.
Good luck.
no offense taken. i think you misunderstood me, i also think that calc is doing something good here and once HE tweeks a few things to HIS liking, HE will find that 58% is a little low for what HE is doing.
One quick note for everyone. After doing some calc's on my own using my recorded data from about the last month, which includes some time before posting on this site, I'm sitting at about 53-54% in calling overs correctly and about 64.5% when calling unders correctly. There is a larger sample size for the under plays than the overs, but it does seem to be significant. Its something I'm going to keep tracking to see how it turns out.
0
One quick note for everyone. After doing some calc's on my own using my recorded data from about the last month, which includes some time before posting on this site, I'm sitting at about 53-54% in calling overs correctly and about 64.5% when calling unders correctly. There is a larger sample size for the under plays than the overs, but it does seem to be significant. Its something I'm going to keep tracking to see how it turns out.
Everything is the same in my table except GSW-BK. Numbers are right but I had this feeling... :)
I am on DET-TOR tonight.
I also prefer under games, because in theory you are in winning situation from begining and sometimes 4th Q is making decision. In close games, they are playing defece thighter, so low scoring Q.
Sunday 4/7
Monday - all games had lowest score in 4thQ
Yesterday 5 or 6, 2 were close by point or two.
0
Good luck guys.
Thx @Calc for great plays.
Everything is the same in my table except GSW-BK. Numbers are right but I had this feeling... :)
I am on DET-TOR tonight.
I also prefer under games, because in theory you are in winning situation from begining and sometimes 4th Q is making decision. In close games, they are playing defece thighter, so low scoring Q.
Wow, that was a rough night! 2 points away from 3-3, but went 1-4-1. Some of the other games I had calc'd worked out but like I said I didn't play them, so I can't take them in my record.
Last night: 1-4-1 YTD: 40-31-1 = 57%
For tonight, here are my calcs
Team 1 Team 2 Line Difference Play Expected Total Mia Nyk 196.00 2.47 Over 198.47 Okc Den 209.50 2.85 Over 212.35
0
Wow, that was a rough night! 2 points away from 3-3, but went 1-4-1. Some of the other games I had calc'd worked out but like I said I didn't play them, so I can't take them in my record.
Last night: 1-4-1 YTD: 40-31-1 = 57%
For tonight, here are my calcs
Team 1 Team 2 Line Difference Play Expected Total Mia Nyk 196.00 2.47 Over 198.47 Okc Den 209.50 2.85 Over 212.35
One quick note for everyone. After doing some calc's on my own using my recorded data from about the last month, which includes some time before posting on this site, I'm sitting at about 53-54% in calling overs correctly and about 64.5% when calling unders correctly. There is a larger sample size for the under plays than the overs, but it does seem to be significant. Its something I'm going to keep tracking to see how it turns out.
To take this a step further...try checking your record when your total is a certain amount under the line.
For Example: When my total is 3 pts under the books' line, my unders are correct XX.X% of the time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Calculationer:
One quick note for everyone. After doing some calc's on my own using my recorded data from about the last month, which includes some time before posting on this site, I'm sitting at about 53-54% in calling overs correctly and about 64.5% when calling unders correctly. There is a larger sample size for the under plays than the overs, but it does seem to be significant. Its something I'm going to keep tracking to see how it turns out.
To take this a step further...try checking your record when your total is a certain amount under the line.
For Example: When my total is 3 pts under the books' line, my unders are correct XX.X% of the time.
Your unders may be correct this often because unders have hit roughly 58% in games since you started this on 12/31. Not saying that your model isn't working but I just wanted to point out that unders have been coming in lately.
0
Your unders may be correct this often because unders have hit roughly 58% in games since you started this on 12/31. Not saying that your model isn't working but I just wanted to point out that unders have been coming in lately.
Hey Mercur1, I do have that data, and my winning percentage takes a hike when looking at unders, as i mentioned, and then takes another hike when my spread is above a certain value. I have that data, just not the time right now to share it. Also, its on smaller sample size (I wasn't recording my expected totals for a while, just wins/losses). Obviously unders have been working, and above about a -4.00 difference they're gold.
Unfortunately I don't have loads of time to put into this right now, so it might be a bit before I get to it. Every night, however, there is more data to pull from and more chance to better my betting system based on the numbers. Right now the numbers are the one thing that I am confident in. Obviously any night can give you any results, and especially when you're looking at only a 2 basket change between a win and a loss.
0
Hey Mercur1, I do have that data, and my winning percentage takes a hike when looking at unders, as i mentioned, and then takes another hike when my spread is above a certain value. I have that data, just not the time right now to share it. Also, its on smaller sample size (I wasn't recording my expected totals for a while, just wins/losses). Obviously unders have been working, and above about a -4.00 difference they're gold.
Unfortunately I don't have loads of time to put into this right now, so it might be a bit before I get to it. Every night, however, there is more data to pull from and more chance to better my betting system based on the numbers. Right now the numbers are the one thing that I am confident in. Obviously any night can give you any results, and especially when you're looking at only a 2 basket change between a win and a loss.
Just wanted to thank you for posting your picks early, because I was able to get the totals before they both went up! Just started tailing your o/u picks because I have no system of my own for o/u. Been doing pretty good on teams that I post on this forum and now hopefully I can through your o/u picks in and do even better! Good luck and thanks!
0
Just wanted to thank you for posting your picks early, because I was able to get the totals before they both went up! Just started tailing your o/u picks because I have no system of my own for o/u. Been doing pretty good on teams that I post on this forum and now hopefully I can through your o/u picks in and do even better! Good luck and thanks!
I like your system, very mathematical, congrats on doing such a great job, just wondering if you ever play reverse line movements into your equation, there is a small on the heat game tn (towards under) and I agree with the OKC game over, (with public betting an the way the total moved), just thought I ask,
BOL, keep up the great work
0
I like your system, very mathematical, congrats on doing such a great job, just wondering if you ever play reverse line movements into your equation, there is a small on the heat game tn (towards under) and I agree with the OKC game over, (with public betting an the way the total moved), just thought I ask,
Good work on the previous hits but systems cannot pertain to one factor only, I'm sure if you combine other factors into your system you would be better in the long run. Good luck on your picks as always
0
Good work on the previous hits but systems cannot pertain to one factor only, I'm sure if you combine other factors into your system you would be better in the long run. Good luck on your picks as always
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.