You bet against the Magic after they just had a winning streak snapped? When they're playing against a team that beat them the last time they met? You're betting against the Magic after Dwight Howard stunk up the place on Friday night? Dude, you don't wanna go there. Your Memphis +10.5 play is anything but solid. In fact, I'm not waiting one more minute. I'm going to lay -10.5 -108 at Pinnacle right now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pardonmyparlay:
What is a good solid pick for tommorow?
I am locked in for Memphis +10.5 vs Magic
I would like another solid one just in case...
You bet against the Magic after they just had a winning streak snapped? When they're playing against a team that beat them the last time they met? You're betting against the Magic after Dwight Howard stunk up the place on Friday night? Dude, you don't wanna go there. Your Memphis +10.5 play is anything but solid. In fact, I'm not waiting one more minute. I'm going to lay -10.5 -108 at Pinnacle right now.
i rarely post but i have followed and bet warriors. i'm leaning with the toronto craptors -8. warriors are a different animal on the road (they suck 4-30 or somewhere around that number) plus not to mention the craptors are trying to hold off the bulls for the last playoff spot and seeking a revenge for that debacle at oracle last month. toronto has picked up the pace spread wise in the last several games going 7-1 ats.
0
i rarely post but i have followed and bet warriors. i'm leaning with the toronto craptors -8. warriors are a different animal on the road (they suck 4-30 or somewhere around that number) plus not to mention the craptors are trying to hold off the bulls for the last playoff spot and seeking a revenge for that debacle at oracle last month. toronto has picked up the pace spread wise in the last several games going 7-1 ats.
Whoa that is a lot of units! What is the amount of your lowest and highest units? I ask that because I intend to tail you on the pick. I need to adjust the size of my units accordingly. 10 units will be 1K to me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
10.8 to win 10.
Whoa that is a lot of units! What is the amount of your lowest and highest units? I ask that because I intend to tail you on the pick. I need to adjust the size of my units accordingly. 10 units will be 1K to me.
Whoa that is a lot of units! What is the amount of your lowest and highest units? I ask that because I intend to tail you on the pick. I need to adjust the size of my units accordingly. 10 units will be 1K to me.
My average bet is 5-8 units. A better than average bet is 9-15 units. One unit = 1K.
I may add more to the Orlando bet tomorrow, maybe another five spot.
0
Quote Originally Posted by willywagtail:
Whoa that is a lot of units! What is the amount of your lowest and highest units? I ask that because I intend to tail you on the pick. I need to adjust the size of my units accordingly. 10 units will be 1K to me.
My average bet is 5-8 units. A better than average bet is 9-15 units. One unit = 1K.
I may add more to the Orlando bet tomorrow, maybe another five spot.
My average bet is 5-8 units. A better than average bet is 9-15 units. One unit = 1K.
I may add more to the Orlando bet tomorrow, maybe another five spot.
I remember reading about the angle of the Magic covering 29 straight times if Howard has at least 12 rebounds & 12 points in a road loss the last time out. How is that record holding up? Howard only has 6 rebounds and 10 points in the loss against the old spurs 2 nights ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
My average bet is 5-8 units. A better than average bet is 9-15 units. One unit = 1K.
I may add more to the Orlando bet tomorrow, maybe another five spot.
I remember reading about the angle of the Magic covering 29 straight times if Howard has at least 12 rebounds & 12 points in a road loss the last time out. How is that record holding up? Howard only has 6 rebounds and 10 points in the loss against the old spurs 2 nights ago.
I remember reading about the angle of the Magic covering 29 straight times if Howard has at least 12 rebounds & 12 points in a road loss the last time out. How is that record holding up? Howard only has 6 rebounds and 10 points in the loss against the old spurs 2 nights ago.
I'm going to post some more things about the Magic later this morning. I'm doing the homework now. This should be a major blowout today. Anyone who figures the Magic will be taking it easy on the Grizzlies is figuring wrong.
0
Quote Originally Posted by willywagtail:
I remember reading about the angle of the Magic covering 29 straight times if Howard has at least 12 rebounds & 12 points in a road loss the last time out. How is that record holding up? Howard only has 6 rebounds and 10 points in the loss against the old spurs 2 nights ago.
I'm going to post some more things about the Magic later this morning. I'm doing the homework now. This should be a major blowout today. Anyone who figures the Magic will be taking it easy on the Grizzlies is figuring wrong.
I'm going to post some more things about the Magic later this morning. I'm doing the homework now. This should be a major blowout today. Anyone who figures the Magic will be taking it easy on the Grizzlies is figuring wrong.
Cool! Can't wait to see what you have dug up on the Magic! On a side note, will you be betting on the Yankee-Red Sox opener?
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
I'm going to post some more things about the Magic later this morning. I'm doing the homework now. This should be a major blowout today. Anyone who figures the Magic will be taking it easy on the Grizzlies is figuring wrong.
Cool! Can't wait to see what you have dug up on the Magic! On a side note, will you be betting on the Yankee-Red Sox opener?
I remember reading about the angle of the Magic covering 29 straight times if Howard has at least 12 rebounds & 12 points in a road loss the last time out. How is that record holding up? Howard only has 6 rebounds and 10 points in the loss against the old spurs 2 nights ago.
That Dwight Howard trend, which was 28-0-1 ATS at the end of last season (including playoff games), is now 32-3-2 ATS. Here are the eight qualifying games from this season:
December 11th Orlando +3 at Phoenix L103-106 (push)
December 19th Orlando -8.5 vs Portland W92-83 (winner)
January 9th Orlando -3.5 vs Atlanta W113-81 (winner)
January 20th Orlando -12 vs Indiana W109-98 (loser)
January 28th Orlando -3.5 vs Boston W96-94 (loser)
February 17th Orlando -11 vs Detroit W116-91 (winner)
February 28th Orlando -11 vs Miami W96-80 (winner)
March 26th Orlando -15 vs Minnesota W106-97 (winner)
0
Quote Originally Posted by willywagtail:
I remember reading about the angle of the Magic covering 29 straight times if Howard has at least 12 rebounds & 12 points in a road loss the last time out. How is that record holding up? Howard only has 6 rebounds and 10 points in the loss against the old spurs 2 nights ago.
That Dwight Howard trend, which was 28-0-1 ATS at the end of last season (including playoff games), is now 32-3-2 ATS. Here are the eight qualifying games from this season:
December 11th Orlando +3 at Phoenix L103-106 (push)
December 19th Orlando -8.5 vs Portland W92-83 (winner)
January 9th Orlando -3.5 vs Atlanta W113-81 (winner)
January 20th Orlando -12 vs Indiana W109-98 (loser)
January 28th Orlando -3.5 vs Boston W96-94 (loser)
February 17th Orlando -11 vs Detroit W116-91 (winner)
February 28th Orlando -11 vs Miami W96-80 (winner)
March 26th Orlando -15 vs Minnesota W106-97 (winner)
March 26th Orlando -15 vs Minnesota W106-97 (winner)
You made a mistake, that was a loss.
Hmm, 4-3-1 ATS this season..
The lines were bound to get higher for Orlando this season following last spring's playoff victory over LeBron and the resulting NBA Finals appearance.
In that 109-98 win over Indiana, the Magic were ahead by 20 points going into the 4th and then let themselves get backdoored. The 96-94 win over Boston missed the cover by a basket, and the non-covering win over Minnesota was simply a lazy effort against a team they probably felt a little bit sorry for.
0
Quote Originally Posted by willywagtail:
March 26th Orlando -15 vs Minnesota W106-97 (winner)
You made a mistake, that was a loss.
Hmm, 4-3-1 ATS this season..
The lines were bound to get higher for Orlando this season following last spring's playoff victory over LeBron and the resulting NBA Finals appearance.
In that 109-98 win over Indiana, the Magic were ahead by 20 points going into the 4th and then let themselves get backdoored. The 96-94 win over Boston missed the cover by a basket, and the non-covering win over Minnesota was simply a lazy effort against a team they probably felt a little bit sorry for.
Bator's trend was pure $ last year no doubt, but...
Magic are 3-8-1 ATS in the first game of a homestand 2 games or longer this season. Orlando is also 3-6-1 ATS coming home off a SU road loss.
I'll take these trends in this spot and roll with the Grizzlies -vs- a mentally indifferent opponent who tends to overlook their competition when laying greater than 10 points on their home court (11-7 ATS good but this leaves room to be desired if backing the Magic).
Just wait for this line to rise up to 12 and then ride the Memphis money train along with the u204.
GL with whatever you decide Pardon.
0
Bator's trend was pure $ last year no doubt, but...
Magic are 3-8-1 ATS in the first game of a homestand 2 games or longer this season. Orlando is also 3-6-1 ATS coming home off a SU road loss.
I'll take these trends in this spot and roll with the Grizzlies -vs- a mentally indifferent opponent who tends to overlook their competition when laying greater than 10 points on their home court (11-7 ATS good but this leaves room to be desired if backing the Magic).
Just wait for this line to rise up to 12 and then ride the Memphis money train along with the u204.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
