I was able to instantly win a substantial sum of money with NBA, couple years in a row so I decided to start this thread...
But returning to the subject of this topic. This is due to the fact that I want to test the validity of the two systems, which I invented myself. I'll be using them together
The case is as follows. There will be two systems. I will describe each separately.
SYSTEM I This systems is al about steady progression of earnings 18 units , which will go 2 bets on the NBA games. Max on the progression of each will be 5 levels to roughly the amount of 1220 units (the state of the account is ~ 2440 unit). The initial rate will be determined here, depending on the course of the meeting, which is in the NBA and Handicap in general ~105
I want to test that system, optional verification of it on six levels, each had a gradual progression of 5 degrees was bad (when profits were established only at 7.77 unit, but it will be a safer option.)
System II will be a system of variable profit, where I also ran two parallel progressions in which the capital will be amounted to PLN 1220 units each (2,440 Unit account balance). Progressions here will, in turn, allowed 6 levels. Course meetings will oscillate in the same limits as in the above system,
summing up my goal is to first verify the truth and efficienc of these systems, and if (hopefully) prove to be an opportunity for profit
I hope I'm understandable enough.
Today's action:
System I
Two progressions. I will elaborate on the 1a and 1b. In each match is to be profit 18 PLN.
1a. Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5; 18.54 unit to win 18
1b. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks Under 192.5, 18.91unit to win
System II
Two progressions, I wrote 1y and 1z. In each match a different profit.
1y.Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5 course 1971; 4unit to win 3.88
1z. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks under 192.5,4 unit to win 3.81
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Hello everyone.
I was able to instantly win a substantial sum of money with NBA, couple years in a row so I decided to start this thread...
But returning to the subject of this topic. This is due to the fact that I want to test the validity of the two systems, which I invented myself. I'll be using them together
The case is as follows. There will be two systems. I will describe each separately.
SYSTEM I This systems is al about steady progression of earnings 18 units , which will go 2 bets on the NBA games. Max on the progression of each will be 5 levels to roughly the amount of 1220 units (the state of the account is ~ 2440 unit). The initial rate will be determined here, depending on the course of the meeting, which is in the NBA and Handicap in general ~105
I want to test that system, optional verification of it on six levels, each had a gradual progression of 5 degrees was bad (when profits were established only at 7.77 unit, but it will be a safer option.)
System II will be a system of variable profit, where I also ran two parallel progressions in which the capital will be amounted to PLN 1220 units each (2,440 Unit account balance). Progressions here will, in turn, allowed 6 levels. Course meetings will oscillate in the same limits as in the above system,
summing up my goal is to first verify the truth and efficienc of these systems, and if (hopefully) prove to be an opportunity for profit
I hope I'm understandable enough.
Today's action:
System I
Two progressions. I will elaborate on the 1a and 1b. In each match is to be profit 18 PLN.
1a. Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5; 18.54 unit to win 18
1b. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks Under 192.5, 18.91unit to win
System II
Two progressions, I wrote 1y and 1z. In each match a different profit.
1y.Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5 course 1971; 4unit to win 3.88
1z. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks under 192.5,4 unit to win 3.81
I was able to instantly win a substantial sum of money with NBA, couple years in a row so I decided to start this thread...
But returning to the subject of this topic. This is due to the fact that I want to test the validity of the two systems, which I invented myself. I'll be using them together
The case is as follows. There will be two systems. I will describe each separately.
SYSTEM I This systems is al about steady progression of earnings 18 units , which will go 2 bets on the NBA games. Max on the progression of each will be 5 levels to roughly the amount of 1220 units (the state of the account is ~ 2440 unit). The initial rate will be determined here, depending on the course of the meeting, which is in the NBA and Handicap in general ~105
I want to test that system, optional verification of it on six levels, each had a gradual progression of 5 degrees was bad (when profits were established only at 7.77 unit, but it will be a safer option.)
System II will be a system of variable profit, where I also ran two parallel progressions in which the capital will be amounted to PLN 1220 units each (2,440 Unit account balance). Progressions here will, in turn, allowed 6 levels. Course meetings will oscillate in the same limits as in the above system,
summing up my goal is to first verify the truth and efficienc of these systems, and if (hopefully) prove to be an opportunity for profit
I hope I'm understandable enough.
Today's action:
System I
Two progressions. I will elaborate on the 1a and 1b. In each match is to be profit 18 PLN.
1a. Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5; 18.54 unit to win 18
1b. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks Under 192.5, 18.91unit to win
System II
Two progressions, I wrote 1y and 1z. In each match a different profit.
1y.Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5 course 1971; 4unit to win 3.88
1z. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks under 192.5,4 unit to win 3.81
The start is promising.
System I 1a. Gain 18 unit 1b. Gain 18 unit
System II 1y. Profit 3.88 unit 1z. Profit 3.81 unit
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chwileulotne:
Hello everyone.
I was able to instantly win a substantial sum of money with NBA, couple years in a row so I decided to start this thread...
But returning to the subject of this topic. This is due to the fact that I want to test the validity of the two systems, which I invented myself. I'll be using them together
The case is as follows. There will be two systems. I will describe each separately.
SYSTEM I This systems is al about steady progression of earnings 18 units , which will go 2 bets on the NBA games. Max on the progression of each will be 5 levels to roughly the amount of 1220 units (the state of the account is ~ 2440 unit). The initial rate will be determined here, depending on the course of the meeting, which is in the NBA and Handicap in general ~105
I want to test that system, optional verification of it on six levels, each had a gradual progression of 5 degrees was bad (when profits were established only at 7.77 unit, but it will be a safer option.)
System II will be a system of variable profit, where I also ran two parallel progressions in which the capital will be amounted to PLN 1220 units each (2,440 Unit account balance). Progressions here will, in turn, allowed 6 levels. Course meetings will oscillate in the same limits as in the above system,
summing up my goal is to first verify the truth and efficienc of these systems, and if (hopefully) prove to be an opportunity for profit
I hope I'm understandable enough.
Today's action:
System I
Two progressions. I will elaborate on the 1a and 1b. In each match is to be profit 18 PLN.
1a. Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5; 18.54 unit to win 18
1b. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks Under 192.5, 18.91unit to win
System II
Two progressions, I wrote 1y and 1z. In each match a different profit.
1y.Orlando Magic vs. Houston Rockets -3.5 course 1971; 4unit to win 3.88
1z. Chicago Bulls Vs. Milwaukee Bucks under 192.5,4 unit to win 3.81
The start is promising.
System I 1a. Gain 18 unit 1b. Gain 18 unit
System II 1y. Profit 3.88 unit 1z. Profit 3.81 unit
What the fuck are you saying. Your dumb ass . NBA is all about Match Ups. Your a Nerd. You ever even play this game. You sound like a fucking nerd get out of your Mothers basement.
0
What the fuck are you saying. Your dumb ass . NBA is all about Match Ups. Your a Nerd. You ever even play this game. You sound like a fucking nerd get out of your Mothers basement.
1a. Oklahoma City Thunder - 3 vs. Charlotte Bobcats 18.91 unit to win 18
1b. Toronto Raptors vs. Phoenix Suns -4 19.44 unit to win 18
System II
1y. Oklahoma City Thunder - 3 vs. Charlotte Bobcats 4 unit to win 3.81
1z. Toronto Raptors vs. Phoenix Suns -4 4 unit to win 3.70
System I 1a. Gain 18 unit 1b. Loss 19.44 unit (now I'll start second phase of the progression. Progression has 5 degrees)
System II 1y. Gain 3.81 unit 1z. Loss 4 unit
This system is for real. All bets was being made. That's all. I belive in this system because in higher degrees of the progression the gain always compensates previuos losses
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chwileulotne:
Todays Picks
System I
1a. Oklahoma City Thunder - 3 vs. Charlotte Bobcats 18.91 unit to win 18
1b. Toronto Raptors vs. Phoenix Suns -4 19.44 unit to win 18
System II
1y. Oklahoma City Thunder - 3 vs. Charlotte Bobcats 4 unit to win 3.81
1z. Toronto Raptors vs. Phoenix Suns -4 4 unit to win 3.70
System I 1a. Gain 18 unit 1b. Loss 19.44 unit (now I'll start second phase of the progression. Progression has 5 degrees)
System II 1y. Gain 3.81 unit 1z. Loss 4 unit
This system is for real. All bets was being made. That's all. I belive in this system because in higher degrees of the progression the gain always compensates previuos losses
1a. Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 17.65 unit to win 18 1b. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 55.48 unit to win 36
System II
1y.Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 4 unit to win 4.04 1z. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 11.52 unit to win 7.29
0
Todays picks
System I
1a. Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 17.65 unit to win 18 1b. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 55.48 unit to win 36
System II
1y.Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 4 unit to win 4.04 1z. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 11.52 unit to win 7.29
1a. Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 17.65 unit to win 18 1b. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 55.48 unit to win 36
System II
1y.Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 4 unit to win 4.04 1z. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 11.52 unit to win 7.29
System I 1a. Gain 18 unit 1b. Loss 55.48 unit. I'll start 3rd degree of proression (3 from 5)
System II 1a. Gain 4.04 unit 1b. Loss 11.52 unit. I'll start 3rd degree of proression (3 from 6)
0
Quote Originally Posted by Chwileulotne:
Todays picks
System I
1a. Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 17.65 unit to win 18 1b. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 55.48 unit to win 36
System II
1y.Chicago Bulls + 6,5 Dallas Mavericks 4 unit to win 4.04 1z. second degree of progression San Antonio Spurs vs. Houston Rockets -3,5 11.52 unit to win 7.29
System I 1a. Gain 18 unit 1b. Loss 55.48 unit. I'll start 3rd degree of proression (3 from 5)
System II 1a. Gain 4.04 unit 1b. Loss 11.52 unit. I'll start 3rd degree of proression (3 from 6)
the thing is with this system.. there are max bets u can make plus with this system you need a huge bankroll....
This system has been around since gambling started, you bet what you lost but if you go on a bad streak, you will need a massive bankroll and make sure that the book doesnt havea max bet that is under your huge bet.
0
the thing is with this system.. there are max bets u can make plus with this system you need a huge bankroll....
This system has been around since gambling started, you bet what you lost but if you go on a bad streak, you will need a massive bankroll and make sure that the book doesnt havea max bet that is under your huge bet.
the thing is with this system.. there are max bets u can make plus with this system you need a huge bankroll....
This system has been around since gambling started, you bet what you lost but if you go on a bad streak, you will need a massive bankroll and make sure that the book doesnt havea max bet that is under your huge bet.
I realize that this is not the ideal system. In the first case has only five levels, and the second has six levels. My capital is 2400 units. 1 unit is 1 Euro. Fortunately, this amount is not being limited by Pinnacle. .Beside dry mathematics, I base on the analysis, I believe it will be fine.
0
Quote Originally Posted by MoneyShot:
the thing is with this system.. there are max bets u can make plus with this system you need a huge bankroll....
This system has been around since gambling started, you bet what you lost but if you go on a bad streak, you will need a massive bankroll and make sure that the book doesnt havea max bet that is under your huge bet.
I realize that this is not the ideal system. In the first case has only five levels, and the second has six levels. My capital is 2400 units. 1 unit is 1 Euro. Fortunately, this amount is not being limited by Pinnacle. .Beside dry mathematics, I base on the analysis, I believe it will be fine.
as long as you have a huge(and i mean HUGE) bankroll.. this will guarantee you a win eventually.
but you needf guts to play this style... theoretically to lose 5 straight times is around a 1.5% probability. and there are many factors affecting this.
in theory, as a spectator, betting alongside you on your 5th/6th progression has a high % of winning.. or so i hope
goodluck bro
0
as long as you have a huge(and i mean HUGE) bankroll.. this will guarantee you a win eventually.
but you needf guts to play this style... theoretically to lose 5 straight times is around a 1.5% probability. and there are many factors affecting this.
in theory, as a spectator, betting alongside you on your 5th/6th progression has a high % of winning.. or so i hope
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.