There will not be 4 game 7's on Sunday. Won't happen.
2 at the most, LA/Memphis & NY/Boston
Many times you may hear that the point spread is designed to create a
case where half of the bettors choose one team and the other half of the
bettors make wagers on the other. That's close, but it's not entirely
correct, as not all sports bettors wager the same amount. If a
sportsbook receives 50 bets on the Lakers for $110 each, but receives 50
bets on the Spurs for $330 each, the person creating the point spread
(the oddsmaker) hasn't done a very good setting the point spread, even
though the same number of bettors are betting on each team.
The sportsbooks are aware that the so-called wise guys (smart bettors)
are going to wager more money on the average than a typical bettor, so
the point spread is created with trying to beat the wise guys. If a
sportsbook has the wise guys on one team and the general public betting
on the other side, they typically will be rooting for the public, with
the knowledge that the public bettors are more likely to give back their
winnings on another game.
One of the most famous stories involving the point spread occurred after
Super Bowl III when the New York Jets, who were 18-point underdogs,
upset the Baltimore Colts. A reporter asked oddsmaker Bob Martin if he
was embarrassed about making that point spread, and Martin replied that
was one of the best numbers he ever made because it split the betting
money down the middle.
Because bettors risk $11 to win $10, any time the money is close to
even on a particular game, the sportsbooks are happy because they
guarantee a profit without any risk. If a sportsbook receives $33,000 in
bets on Team A and $33,000 on Team B, they stand to make $3,000
regardless of who wins the game. Such a scenario doesn't happen nearly
as often as the sportsbooks would like, but it will happen on occasion.
For a number of years, the point spread for the upcoming football games
was released every Sunday night by the Stardust Race and Sportsbook and
it was almost a circus-like atmosphere, as lottery numbers were drawn to
get to see which bettors would have the first chance to bet into the
unveiled point spread. The popularity of Internet sports gambling has
taken away a lot of the thunder from the Las Vegas sportsbooks, and most
sportsbooks now are content to follow the general point spreads of the
other sportsbooks.
A sportsbook who varies its line too much from the consensus line of the
other sportsbooks is likely to receive many wagers on the team offering
the best odds, and puts itself in financial risk should that team
happen to cover the point spread. If all of the sportsbooks had the
Steelers as 7-point favorites over the Jets, but one sportsbook released
a point spread of Pittsburgh -5, they would get a great amount of money
wagered on the Steelers, and very little at all on the Jets, and
sportsbooks do not like to be exposed to those type of situations where
they can stand to lose a great deal of money.
Many times you may hear that the point spread is designed to create a
case where half of the bettors choose one team and the other half of the
bettors make wagers on the other. That's close, but it's not entirely
correct, as not all sports bettors wager the same amount. If a
sportsbook receives 50 bets on the Lakers for $110 each, but receives 50
bets on the Spurs for $330 each, the person creating the point spread
(the oddsmaker) hasn't done a very good setting the point spread, even
though the same number of bettors are betting on each team.
The sportsbooks are aware that the so-called wise guys (smart bettors)
are going to wager more money on the average than a typical bettor, so
the point spread is created with trying to beat the wise guys. If a
sportsbook has the wise guys on one team and the general public betting
on the other side, they typically will be rooting for the public, with
the knowledge that the public bettors are more likely to give back their
winnings on another game.
One of the most famous stories involving the point spread occurred after
Super Bowl III when the New York Jets, who were 18-point underdogs,
upset the Baltimore Colts. A reporter asked oddsmaker Bob Martin if he
was embarrassed about making that point spread, and Martin replied that
was one of the best numbers he ever made because it split the betting
money down the middle.
Because bettors risk $11 to win $10, any time the money is close to
even on a particular game, the sportsbooks are happy because they
guarantee a profit without any risk. If a sportsbook receives $33,000 in
bets on Team A and $33,000 on Team B, they stand to make $3,000
regardless of who wins the game. Such a scenario doesn't happen nearly
as often as the sportsbooks would like, but it will happen on occasion.
For a number of years, the point spread for the upcoming football games
was released every Sunday night by the Stardust Race and Sportsbook and
it was almost a circus-like atmosphere, as lottery numbers were drawn to
get to see which bettors would have the first chance to bet into the
unveiled point spread. The popularity of Internet sports gambling has
taken away a lot of the thunder from the Las Vegas sportsbooks, and most
sportsbooks now are content to follow the general point spreads of the
other sportsbooks.
A sportsbook who varies its line too much from the consensus line of the
other sportsbooks is likely to receive many wagers on the team offering
the best odds, and puts itself in financial risk should that team
happen to cover the point spread. If all of the sportsbooks had the
Steelers as 7-point favorites over the Jets, but one sportsbook released
a point spread of Pittsburgh -5, they would get a great amount of money
wagered on the Steelers, and very little at all on the Jets, and
sportsbooks do not like to be exposed to those type of situations where
they can stand to lose a great deal of money.
Goodstuff tony...youre really teaching me a lot of things
Going back to the ball game...This kid Reggie Jackson fills up westbrooks's role decently... not bad... But what got my attention today is the Clipjoint trying to kill the griz....whew...Bloodbath!
Best matchup of 2013 playoffs locked down - MEM-OKC . . . MIA got one decent suitor this year . . .GO GRIZ!!!!!
Goodstuff tony...youre really teaching me a lot of things
Going back to the ball game...This kid Reggie Jackson fills up westbrooks's role decently... not bad... But what got my attention today is the Clipjoint trying to kill the griz....whew...Bloodbath!
Best matchup of 2013 playoffs locked down - MEM-OKC . . . MIA got one decent suitor this year . . .GO GRIZ!!!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.