I think you are greatly exaggerating as it relates to Whitman. The Wizards lost because they literally couldn't hit a shot. It's no secret that they are a perimeter team offensively. To me, the Pacers have been pretty unimpressive offensively even in their last two wins. Washington's defense has not suffered despite its unbelievable offensive struggles. The coaching isn't costing the Wizards right now. I would actually argue Vogel might be the worst coach left in the playoffs, but I'm of the opinion that coaching is not as much a factor in the NBA playoffs as it is in, say, the NFL.
I see the Wizards holding on to tie the series up tonight. Just no way they can shoot that poorly again and I still like their match ups overall. I wouldn't take the spread though, as I see it going down to the wire. It should be a good one and I expect this series to go 7 at this point.
Quote Originally Posted by alangrrbs:
After watching the last couple games, it's pretty apparent that Whitman is the worse coach in the 2014 playoffs. If his team is not hitting outside jumpers, he has absolutely no plan on how to generate more sets, and mess with different lineups.
His team is also playing against a team with a center who was mentally falling apart yet they've managed to let him get on track, and get his confidence back. They also played right into the Pacers hands by playing a "knock down, drag out fight" style last game as opposed to trying to use their speed.
I knew Whitman was bad, but I can't believe how much he's contributed to giving away the last couple games. Normally it's tough to keep coaching in mind when capping games, but this guy makes a difference. I'll sprinkle a little bit on the Pacers +4.5 for this game as I don't see how Whitman figured out any adjustments or game plans for this pivotal game 3. My guess is this will be a close game coming down to the last minute.
0
I think you are greatly exaggerating as it relates to Whitman. The Wizards lost because they literally couldn't hit a shot. It's no secret that they are a perimeter team offensively. To me, the Pacers have been pretty unimpressive offensively even in their last two wins. Washington's defense has not suffered despite its unbelievable offensive struggles. The coaching isn't costing the Wizards right now. I would actually argue Vogel might be the worst coach left in the playoffs, but I'm of the opinion that coaching is not as much a factor in the NBA playoffs as it is in, say, the NFL.
I see the Wizards holding on to tie the series up tonight. Just no way they can shoot that poorly again and I still like their match ups overall. I wouldn't take the spread though, as I see it going down to the wire. It should be a good one and I expect this series to go 7 at this point.
Quote Originally Posted by alangrrbs:
After watching the last couple games, it's pretty apparent that Whitman is the worse coach in the 2014 playoffs. If his team is not hitting outside jumpers, he has absolutely no plan on how to generate more sets, and mess with different lineups.
His team is also playing against a team with a center who was mentally falling apart yet they've managed to let him get on track, and get his confidence back. They also played right into the Pacers hands by playing a "knock down, drag out fight" style last game as opposed to trying to use their speed.
I knew Whitman was bad, but I can't believe how much he's contributed to giving away the last couple games. Normally it's tough to keep coaching in mind when capping games, but this guy makes a difference. I'll sprinkle a little bit on the Pacers +4.5 for this game as I don't see how Whitman figured out any adjustments or game plans for this pivotal game 3. My guess is this will be a close game coming down to the last minute.
I'm going to respectfully and seriously disagree with you, and I really didn't think I would meet someone who didn't think Whitman is a train wreck.
Whitman had Harrington and Gooden playing minutes late. Wall couldn't pull the trigger on a wide open three...and then they throw away the ball on the last possession. Well coached teams don't do those things. And to say Vogel is the worse coach left is 100% wrong. Whitman and Brooks are worse and that's not even arguable. Yes Vogel has his moments, but he's not costing his team wins because he has guys like Harrington and Gooden in with the game on the line, and Vogel isn't calling timeouts to set up a play that involves players not being on the same page and throwing the ball into the backcourt.
I appreciate the comment, but I would encourage you greatly to look at the coaching in the playoffs. In a 7 game series it's very beneficial to have the better coach on your side when placing wagers.
0
PMI
I'm going to respectfully and seriously disagree with you, and I really didn't think I would meet someone who didn't think Whitman is a train wreck.
Whitman had Harrington and Gooden playing minutes late. Wall couldn't pull the trigger on a wide open three...and then they throw away the ball on the last possession. Well coached teams don't do those things. And to say Vogel is the worse coach left is 100% wrong. Whitman and Brooks are worse and that's not even arguable. Yes Vogel has his moments, but he's not costing his team wins because he has guys like Harrington and Gooden in with the game on the line, and Vogel isn't calling timeouts to set up a play that involves players not being on the same page and throwing the ball into the backcourt.
I appreciate the comment, but I would encourage you greatly to look at the coaching in the playoffs. In a 7 game series it's very beneficial to have the better coach on your side when placing wagers.
The Pacers have gone from an enjoyable team to watch night in to night out...to a team that can win on Sunday, and then play a historically bad playoff game on Tuesday. Its frustrating as a fan and as a bettor, however the OH system is going strong after a game 1 loss.
In Pacers fashion it wouldn't surprise me if they won tonight after that terrible performance Tuesday. Just because it doesn't make sense.
I'm going to put a little bit on Pacers +4.5...and hope they close out tonight to get me the win on the series wager.
0
The Pacers have gone from an enjoyable team to watch night in to night out...to a team that can win on Sunday, and then play a historically bad playoff game on Tuesday. Its frustrating as a fan and as a bettor, however the OH system is going strong after a game 1 loss.
In Pacers fashion it wouldn't surprise me if they won tonight after that terrible performance Tuesday. Just because it doesn't make sense.
I'm going to put a little bit on Pacers +4.5...and hope they close out tonight to get me the win on the series wager.
God Alan I hope so man. One of these days I will have a stroke from all the commotion the Pacers have caused to my heart. I believe my family would have a good case against the Simons if I keel over and die.
0
God Alan I hope so man. One of these days I will have a stroke from all the commotion the Pacers have caused to my heart. I believe my family would have a good case against the Simons if I keel over and die.
agreed, i have zero faith in the pacers right now. betting them is like roulette. i don't know how they can come back from 19 down in the 3rd q on the road and then return home for a closeout game and look like dog crap! that was literally sickening to watch. sticking with wiz to win series, no hedge for me.
0
agreed, i have zero faith in the pacers right now. betting them is like roulette. i don't know how they can come back from 19 down in the 3rd q on the road and then return home for a closeout game and look like dog crap! that was literally sickening to watch. sticking with wiz to win series, no hedge for me.
It comes down to these two teams in the East as everyone thought it would at the beginning of the year…and this series will be as entertaining as it gets. This series has star power, a clash of styles, legacies on the line, the future of the big 3, an up and coming team trying to break through, two legendary GM's, and inconsistency from both teams. It's got all the makings of a fantastic series. So here's the preview from my point of view.
Word of caution to bettors: Don't put too much into the national media's coverage of the "implosion" of the Pacers. They just made the Eastern Conference finals with home court advantage…which was the goal from the beginning of the season. I heard Steven A Smith say that he thinks, "The Pacers don't deserve to be here". Most of the time I enjoy the insight he has, and there's no arguing he is well connected, but to say a team who had the number 1 seed in the East doesn't deserve to be in the Eastern Conference finals is a joke. Yes they've looked bad at times, yes they have some mind boggling performances…but it's easy to focus on how bad they've looked at times, and ignore the fact that they've played well on the road. Make no mistake: This is what the Pacers have been waiting for all season long. I won't look too much at the Pacers previous performances as the mindset has changed from the previous series' to this one. Is it hard to trust the Pacers? I would argue not as hard as you would think. What hurts is when you back the Pacers to win at home, and they go out and get killed and look terrible. You kick yourself, and can't believe they did that…but that loss is the same as not covering the spread by a point at the end of the game. Remove the emotion and look at the facts. They won the series against Atlanta, they won the series against Washington, and they have lots of matchup advantages over Miami. It's really easy to just jump to the conclusion that Miami will kill them, and it won't even be close…and there's a chance that can happen, but instead of just buying into the national media hype, and listening to what every average uneducated sports guy says…be smart and look at all factors when making bets on this series.
Momentum: I can't give either team an advantage here. Both teams closed out their series in good fashion. The Pacers closing out on the road with a big run to end the game…the Heat closing out their rivals in 5 games…I don't see any team with more momentum. I think most people would give Miami the edge, but I think for both these teams, the season starts right now.
Star Power: Big advantage Miami. Lebron is the best player in the world, and this series will be determined on A. How he performs and B. How the Pacers decide to defend him. Paul George can play with Lebron, but over the series he isn't going to out perform him. My best guess is that Wade will give Miami a total of 4 great halves. Maybe they are in the same game, maybe they are spread over different games…whatever the case, when Wade has these big halves, Miami will have a big advantage. Right now for the Pacers, David West is the biggest star for this series. Miami has trouble defending him, and West is playing fantastic basketball right now. Lance and Bosh are the X factors. Both can be inconsistent…both can disappear…and both can win games. In the end, Miami has the best player in the world…and he will determine the series.
Front Court: Big advantage Indiana. If Roy plays big, and David West continues his excellent play, Miami will be in trouble. It is possible that these two guys can go for 45 and 24 when they are playing well. If they do that, and play good on defense it is going to be really tough for Miami to win. I love what Anderson does for the Heat. He does some banging around inside, and can occasionally give some energy and points, but he's overmatched. His real value may actually be to get some fouls on West and Hibbert, and that's something West and Roy will have to be aware of. They can't be in foul trouble and open up the lane to Lebron and Wade. Obviously, it's tough to predict what Roy will do from game to game, but he's got to play great for Indiana to have a chance.
0
Heat-Pacers preview
It comes down to these two teams in the East as everyone thought it would at the beginning of the year…and this series will be as entertaining as it gets. This series has star power, a clash of styles, legacies on the line, the future of the big 3, an up and coming team trying to break through, two legendary GM's, and inconsistency from both teams. It's got all the makings of a fantastic series. So here's the preview from my point of view.
Word of caution to bettors: Don't put too much into the national media's coverage of the "implosion" of the Pacers. They just made the Eastern Conference finals with home court advantage…which was the goal from the beginning of the season. I heard Steven A Smith say that he thinks, "The Pacers don't deserve to be here". Most of the time I enjoy the insight he has, and there's no arguing he is well connected, but to say a team who had the number 1 seed in the East doesn't deserve to be in the Eastern Conference finals is a joke. Yes they've looked bad at times, yes they have some mind boggling performances…but it's easy to focus on how bad they've looked at times, and ignore the fact that they've played well on the road. Make no mistake: This is what the Pacers have been waiting for all season long. I won't look too much at the Pacers previous performances as the mindset has changed from the previous series' to this one. Is it hard to trust the Pacers? I would argue not as hard as you would think. What hurts is when you back the Pacers to win at home, and they go out and get killed and look terrible. You kick yourself, and can't believe they did that…but that loss is the same as not covering the spread by a point at the end of the game. Remove the emotion and look at the facts. They won the series against Atlanta, they won the series against Washington, and they have lots of matchup advantages over Miami. It's really easy to just jump to the conclusion that Miami will kill them, and it won't even be close…and there's a chance that can happen, but instead of just buying into the national media hype, and listening to what every average uneducated sports guy says…be smart and look at all factors when making bets on this series.
Momentum: I can't give either team an advantage here. Both teams closed out their series in good fashion. The Pacers closing out on the road with a big run to end the game…the Heat closing out their rivals in 5 games…I don't see any team with more momentum. I think most people would give Miami the edge, but I think for both these teams, the season starts right now.
Star Power: Big advantage Miami. Lebron is the best player in the world, and this series will be determined on A. How he performs and B. How the Pacers decide to defend him. Paul George can play with Lebron, but over the series he isn't going to out perform him. My best guess is that Wade will give Miami a total of 4 great halves. Maybe they are in the same game, maybe they are spread over different games…whatever the case, when Wade has these big halves, Miami will have a big advantage. Right now for the Pacers, David West is the biggest star for this series. Miami has trouble defending him, and West is playing fantastic basketball right now. Lance and Bosh are the X factors. Both can be inconsistent…both can disappear…and both can win games. In the end, Miami has the best player in the world…and he will determine the series.
Front Court: Big advantage Indiana. If Roy plays big, and David West continues his excellent play, Miami will be in trouble. It is possible that these two guys can go for 45 and 24 when they are playing well. If they do that, and play good on defense it is going to be really tough for Miami to win. I love what Anderson does for the Heat. He does some banging around inside, and can occasionally give some energy and points, but he's overmatched. His real value may actually be to get some fouls on West and Hibbert, and that's something West and Roy will have to be aware of. They can't be in foul trouble and open up the lane to Lebron and Wade. Obviously, it's tough to predict what Roy will do from game to game, but he's got to play great for Indiana to have a chance.
Back Court: I'm including the wing players and guards in this.
Advantage Miami. Lebron obviously gives Miami the advantage, but where
Miami can really do some damage is with the defense on George Hill if
the Pacers have Hill handle the ball. Chalmers, and Cole can cause
turnovers, and as we all know that's where Miami is at their best. If
Lance handles the ball, that is going to make Miami decide how to do
their rotations and defense. Lance is bigger than Chalmers and Cole,
but he's so erratic I don't know if the Pacers can trust him to do that a
majority of the game. To me this is where the series will be decided.
The Pacers have to decide if they want to let Lebron go nuts, and only
guard him one on one with Hibbert and West clogging the lane, or do they
double Lebron and let the other guys score.
IMHO, the way to
beat the Heat is to not let the role players beat you. Don't let
Chalmers hit open threes. Don't let Bosh shoot wide open jumpers.
Don't let Cole/Battier/Anderson/Haslem get these random baskets that add
up at the end of the game. When Lebron does everything, you can see
the lack of movement on offense from everyone else, and they stop
running. The role players also get slower on defense. When Lebron is
passing and creating open shots, the role players are involved, and
excited. If I was Vogel, I would be ok with Lebron scoring 40+ every
night as long as the other guys are held in check. I would prevent the
three point shooting, and hope Lebron shoots around 50% or under. But
that's just me.
Home Court Advantage: I know the Pacers have
home court advantage, but the Pacers have been better on the road this
post-season than they have at home. Miami can play good at home or on
the road…it would surprise me if there were 2-3 road wins this season.
No advantage.
Health: This late in the year, it looks like the
Pacers are the healthiest team left in the playoffs, and that's a big
advantage. All the important pieces for Indiana are good to go. For
Miami, I have to believe Lebron is close to showing signs of fatigue.
I've never seen a guy have to do more for his team than Lebron has had
to do this season. If he isn't tired now, he will be after a series
with the Pacers. He will get bumped, and banged…and he's going to have
to rebound, score and assist. It's a lot to ask. I'll be interested to
see how he holds up towards the end of some of these games because he's
not going to be able to sit on the bench for very long. Wade of course
is the mystery…is he healthy or not? It's hard to say, but I think
it's safe to say Wade won't be consistently contributing. He doesn't
have the explosion, and I think he's struggling with how to deal with it
on the court. There will be games where he has a big part of the
outcome, but I don't think over a long series he will be a key factor.
Advantage Pacers.
Coaching: I think the coaches have a lot in
common. I think they both get some unfair criticism. Vogel has caught
some heat for the Pacers struggles where it looks like the players are
mostly to blame. Spoelstra gets criticized for winning because he has
Lebron (ridiculous). But Spoelstra is better than people think, and so
is Vogel. I don't see an advantage here, but maybe a slight lean to
Spoelstra. I like his set plays coming out of timeouts better.
Bench:
This is a complete tossup because nobody knows how effective any of
these benches will be from game to game. I don't think the teams will
be using their benches a whole lot in this series, but I think Scola and
Mahinmi cause slightly more matchup problems for Miami than the Miami
bench players cause for Indiana. I also like how Watson has been
playing, and sometimes he's better than Hill. Slight advantage Indiana.
I
see the price on the series is going up, and the Pacers are at +310
right now…I think if that price goes up it's worth putting a bit on the
Pacers. I don't see the value in Miami at -370 or worse because they
don't have home court…Wade isn't an elite player…Lebron has a huge
workload…and these teams went to 7 games last year. If you're dead set
on betting Miami, I might wait and see if the Pacers win game 1, and
then see if you can get Miami at -200 or better. I'm going to wait and
see how high the Pacers price gets and then probably put a little bit on
the Pacers.
Prediction: Pacers in 7
Setting up Spurs-Pacers in the Championship. Spurs in 5.
0
Back Court: I'm including the wing players and guards in this.
Advantage Miami. Lebron obviously gives Miami the advantage, but where
Miami can really do some damage is with the defense on George Hill if
the Pacers have Hill handle the ball. Chalmers, and Cole can cause
turnovers, and as we all know that's where Miami is at their best. If
Lance handles the ball, that is going to make Miami decide how to do
their rotations and defense. Lance is bigger than Chalmers and Cole,
but he's so erratic I don't know if the Pacers can trust him to do that a
majority of the game. To me this is where the series will be decided.
The Pacers have to decide if they want to let Lebron go nuts, and only
guard him one on one with Hibbert and West clogging the lane, or do they
double Lebron and let the other guys score.
IMHO, the way to
beat the Heat is to not let the role players beat you. Don't let
Chalmers hit open threes. Don't let Bosh shoot wide open jumpers.
Don't let Cole/Battier/Anderson/Haslem get these random baskets that add
up at the end of the game. When Lebron does everything, you can see
the lack of movement on offense from everyone else, and they stop
running. The role players also get slower on defense. When Lebron is
passing and creating open shots, the role players are involved, and
excited. If I was Vogel, I would be ok with Lebron scoring 40+ every
night as long as the other guys are held in check. I would prevent the
three point shooting, and hope Lebron shoots around 50% or under. But
that's just me.
Home Court Advantage: I know the Pacers have
home court advantage, but the Pacers have been better on the road this
post-season than they have at home. Miami can play good at home or on
the road…it would surprise me if there were 2-3 road wins this season.
No advantage.
Health: This late in the year, it looks like the
Pacers are the healthiest team left in the playoffs, and that's a big
advantage. All the important pieces for Indiana are good to go. For
Miami, I have to believe Lebron is close to showing signs of fatigue.
I've never seen a guy have to do more for his team than Lebron has had
to do this season. If he isn't tired now, he will be after a series
with the Pacers. He will get bumped, and banged…and he's going to have
to rebound, score and assist. It's a lot to ask. I'll be interested to
see how he holds up towards the end of some of these games because he's
not going to be able to sit on the bench for very long. Wade of course
is the mystery…is he healthy or not? It's hard to say, but I think
it's safe to say Wade won't be consistently contributing. He doesn't
have the explosion, and I think he's struggling with how to deal with it
on the court. There will be games where he has a big part of the
outcome, but I don't think over a long series he will be a key factor.
Advantage Pacers.
Coaching: I think the coaches have a lot in
common. I think they both get some unfair criticism. Vogel has caught
some heat for the Pacers struggles where it looks like the players are
mostly to blame. Spoelstra gets criticized for winning because he has
Lebron (ridiculous). But Spoelstra is better than people think, and so
is Vogel. I don't see an advantage here, but maybe a slight lean to
Spoelstra. I like his set plays coming out of timeouts better.
Bench:
This is a complete tossup because nobody knows how effective any of
these benches will be from game to game. I don't think the teams will
be using their benches a whole lot in this series, but I think Scola and
Mahinmi cause slightly more matchup problems for Miami than the Miami
bench players cause for Indiana. I also like how Watson has been
playing, and sometimes he's better than Hill. Slight advantage Indiana.
I
see the price on the series is going up, and the Pacers are at +310
right now…I think if that price goes up it's worth putting a bit on the
Pacers. I don't see the value in Miami at -370 or worse because they
don't have home court…Wade isn't an elite player…Lebron has a huge
workload…and these teams went to 7 games last year. If you're dead set
on betting Miami, I might wait and see if the Pacers win game 1, and
then see if you can get Miami at -200 or better. I'm going to wait and
see how high the Pacers price gets and then probably put a little bit on
the Pacers.
Prediction: Pacers in 7
Setting up Spurs-Pacers in the Championship. Spurs in 5.
Nice write-up, Alan, but you forgot to cap a huge component: officiating!
I'm not a believer in the officiating conspiracy. I think it's too easy to blame officials when a bet doesn't go your way, and forget about the calls that go in your favor. You can't predict when officials are going to miss calls, and when they will go against or for you. I know a lot of people believe that the NBA refs have an agenda, but I have lots of knowledge on reffing, and thinking that one can cap a game based on how they think officials will call a game is a mistake. The only agenda the refs have is to do a good enough job so they get asked to do more games. The better job they do, they more games they get, the more money they make. I don't consider it a predictable part of the series.
0
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
Nice write-up, Alan, but you forgot to cap a huge component: officiating!
I'm not a believer in the officiating conspiracy. I think it's too easy to blame officials when a bet doesn't go your way, and forget about the calls that go in your favor. You can't predict when officials are going to miss calls, and when they will go against or for you. I know a lot of people believe that the NBA refs have an agenda, but I have lots of knowledge on reffing, and thinking that one can cap a game based on how they think officials will call a game is a mistake. The only agenda the refs have is to do a good enough job so they get asked to do more games. The better job they do, they more games they get, the more money they make. I don't consider it a predictable part of the series.
I'm not a believer in the officiating conspiracy. I think it's too easy to blame officials when a bet doesn't go your way, and forget about the calls that go in your favor. You can't predict when officials are going to miss calls, and when they will go against or for you. I know a lot of people believe that the NBA refs have an agenda, but I have lots of knowledge on reffing, and thinking that one can cap a game based on how they think officials will call a game is a mistake. The only agenda the refs have is to do a good enough job so they get asked to do more games. The better job they do, they more games they get, the more money they make. I don't consider it a predictable part of the series.
Yes, Alan, please tell that to the Raptors and Clippers (this year), the Kings in 2002, and the Bucks in 2001. I respect you a lot, but let's not be naive.
0
Quote Originally Posted by alangrrbs:
I'm not a believer in the officiating conspiracy. I think it's too easy to blame officials when a bet doesn't go your way, and forget about the calls that go in your favor. You can't predict when officials are going to miss calls, and when they will go against or for you. I know a lot of people believe that the NBA refs have an agenda, but I have lots of knowledge on reffing, and thinking that one can cap a game based on how they think officials will call a game is a mistake. The only agenda the refs have is to do a good enough job so they get asked to do more games. The better job they do, they more games they get, the more money they make. I don't consider it a predictable part of the series.
Yes, Alan, please tell that to the Raptors and Clippers (this year), the Kings in 2002, and the Bucks in 2001. I respect you a lot, but let's not be naive.
Yes, Alan, please tell that to the Raptors and Clippers (this year), the Kings in 2002, and the Bucks in 2001. I respect you a lot, but let's not be naive.
Love the conversation...
I'll start off by saying I'll tell all of those exactly what I said.
I feel like people focus too much on certain calls instead of the big picture, trends and in-game strategy and adjustments. The Clippers lost this year because Chris Paul couldn't stop Russell Westbrook, Kevin Durant is unstoppable right now, and DeAndre Jordan is an offensive liablity. Not because of a call. Even if we all agree the refs missed a call, I don't see how you could have possibly taken that into account when capping a game before it starts. The Raptors lost this year because they were playing a better team with more playoff experience in how to close out games and series. Nobody talks about officiating before a game. They always talk about it after. So I don't see how anyone can take officiating into account when capping games. Does officiating matter? Absolutely. Can it affect the outcomes of games? Absolutely. But it is something that can't be predicted, and worrying about the officials either before or after games simply takes away from looking at the play on the court and why a certain team won or lost, and it prevents bettors from improving their capping skills.
When losing a bet, I'd rather look at if players played above or below their norm...what rotations did the coaches use...was their an injury, etc. Therefore, I'll do the same before the games.
Are you going to be taking any futures in this series?
0
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
Yes, Alan, please tell that to the Raptors and Clippers (this year), the Kings in 2002, and the Bucks in 2001. I respect you a lot, but let's not be naive.
Love the conversation...
I'll start off by saying I'll tell all of those exactly what I said.
I feel like people focus too much on certain calls instead of the big picture, trends and in-game strategy and adjustments. The Clippers lost this year because Chris Paul couldn't stop Russell Westbrook, Kevin Durant is unstoppable right now, and DeAndre Jordan is an offensive liablity. Not because of a call. Even if we all agree the refs missed a call, I don't see how you could have possibly taken that into account when capping a game before it starts. The Raptors lost this year because they were playing a better team with more playoff experience in how to close out games and series. Nobody talks about officiating before a game. They always talk about it after. So I don't see how anyone can take officiating into account when capping games. Does officiating matter? Absolutely. Can it affect the outcomes of games? Absolutely. But it is something that can't be predicted, and worrying about the officials either before or after games simply takes away from looking at the play on the court and why a certain team won or lost, and it prevents bettors from improving their capping skills.
When losing a bet, I'd rather look at if players played above or below their norm...what rotations did the coaches use...was their an injury, etc. Therefore, I'll do the same before the games.
Are you going to be taking any futures in this series?
Bb, you're wasting your time talking to these sports purists. They think the league is officiated without bias. They don't live in reality.
Having a discussion with someone who has a different point of view is not a waste of time. It's one of the healthiest things we can do. Please feel free to contribute...all opinions and thoughts are welcome even if we disagree.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
Bb, you're wasting your time talking to these sports purists. They think the league is officiated without bias. They don't live in reality.
Having a discussion with someone who has a different point of view is not a waste of time. It's one of the healthiest things we can do. Please feel free to contribute...all opinions and thoughts are welcome even if we disagree.
FLOP city were out scored 17-3 in the last few minutes of Game 6 and they (and losing bettors) have the gall to blame the refs......are they biased at times sure, human at others (bad missed calls) sure, but the clippers and CP3 chocked period and lost to the much better team, get over it.
0
FLOP city were out scored 17-3 in the last few minutes of Game 6 and they (and losing bettors) have the gall to blame the refs......are they biased at times sure, human at others (bad missed calls) sure, but the clippers and CP3 chocked period and lost to the much better team, get over it.
I'll start off by saying I'll tell all of those exactly what I said.
I feel like people focus too much on certain calls instead of the big picture, trends and in-game strategy and adjustments. The Clippers lost this year because Chris Paul couldn't stop Russell Westbrook, Kevin Durant is unstoppable right now, and DeAndre Jordan is an offensive liablity. Not because of a call. Even if we all agree the refs missed a call, I don't see how you could have possibly taken that into account when capping a game before it starts. The Raptors lost this year because they were playing a better team with more playoff experience in how to close out games and series. Nobody talks about officiating before a game. They always talk about it after. So I don't see how anyone can take officiating into account when capping games. Does officiating matter? Absolutely. Can it affect the outcomes of games? Absolutely. But it is something that can't be predicted, and worrying about the officials either before or after games simply takes away from looking at the play on the court and why a certain team won or lost, and it prevents bettors from improving their capping skills.
When losing a bet, I'd rather look at if players played above or below their norm...what rotations did the coaches use...was their an injury, etc. Therefore, I'll do the same before the games.
Are you going to be taking any futures in this series?
Well Alan, I'm one of those guys who talks officiating both before and after a game. It is certainly an angle, although most choose to ignore it. In regards to the Clippers series, I said before the series that the Thunder were the better team; so no argument there. But, ironically, that's not why they lost the series, or at least not the sole reason. When they miraculously came back to win game 4, I did a write-up predicting that, in all likelihood, they would win the series. That loss was so devastating to the Thunder that they nearly gave up the ghost in game 5, if not for a miraculous set of events in the final 48 seconds. No one is denying that the Clippers choked but to have 4 50/50 calls/non-calls go against them in the final 16 seconds shows me that there was clear officiating bias, and then to have that happen again (have several 50/50 calls go against them in a close game) on their home floor, really tests one's faith in the integrity of the league. As I said in another thread, two seemingly contradictory explanation can both be true: a flawed clippers team chocked and the refs also screwed them. The Clippers could probably withstand/survive one of those events but not both.
As far as series betting. There is not a chance in hell that the Pacers get through, though I wish you luck. I do, however, have a Spurs getting through (now that Ibaka is hurt). Although I can still see the Thunder winning.
0
Quote Originally Posted by alangrrbs:
Love the conversation...
I'll start off by saying I'll tell all of those exactly what I said.
I feel like people focus too much on certain calls instead of the big picture, trends and in-game strategy and adjustments. The Clippers lost this year because Chris Paul couldn't stop Russell Westbrook, Kevin Durant is unstoppable right now, and DeAndre Jordan is an offensive liablity. Not because of a call. Even if we all agree the refs missed a call, I don't see how you could have possibly taken that into account when capping a game before it starts. The Raptors lost this year because they were playing a better team with more playoff experience in how to close out games and series. Nobody talks about officiating before a game. They always talk about it after. So I don't see how anyone can take officiating into account when capping games. Does officiating matter? Absolutely. Can it affect the outcomes of games? Absolutely. But it is something that can't be predicted, and worrying about the officials either before or after games simply takes away from looking at the play on the court and why a certain team won or lost, and it prevents bettors from improving their capping skills.
When losing a bet, I'd rather look at if players played above or below their norm...what rotations did the coaches use...was their an injury, etc. Therefore, I'll do the same before the games.
Are you going to be taking any futures in this series?
Well Alan, I'm one of those guys who talks officiating both before and after a game. It is certainly an angle, although most choose to ignore it. In regards to the Clippers series, I said before the series that the Thunder were the better team; so no argument there. But, ironically, that's not why they lost the series, or at least not the sole reason. When they miraculously came back to win game 4, I did a write-up predicting that, in all likelihood, they would win the series. That loss was so devastating to the Thunder that they nearly gave up the ghost in game 5, if not for a miraculous set of events in the final 48 seconds. No one is denying that the Clippers choked but to have 4 50/50 calls/non-calls go against them in the final 16 seconds shows me that there was clear officiating bias, and then to have that happen again (have several 50/50 calls go against them in a close game) on their home floor, really tests one's faith in the integrity of the league. As I said in another thread, two seemingly contradictory explanation can both be true: a flawed clippers team chocked and the refs also screwed them. The Clippers could probably withstand/survive one of those events but not both.
As far as series betting. There is not a chance in hell that the Pacers get through, though I wish you luck. I do, however, have a Spurs getting through (now that Ibaka is hurt). Although I can still see the Thunder winning.
The only calmesT aT The end of game 5 wiTh The Clippers was the no call on the foul on the fast break after Chris Paul turn the ball over. giving the ball to the Clippers even though we saw go out on the Clippers would have been the bad call. the way it was sort it out with the way it should have happened. And All the Clippers flop All over the plAce on jumpshot lAyups And everything so then it created problems for the officials to know when they're flopping around they actually get foiled when it comes down to the time that it matters
0
The only calmesT aT The end of game 5 wiTh The Clippers was the no call on the foul on the fast break after Chris Paul turn the ball over. giving the ball to the Clippers even though we saw go out on the Clippers would have been the bad call. the way it was sort it out with the way it should have happened. And All the Clippers flop All over the plAce on jumpshot lAyups And everything so then it created problems for the officials to know when they're flopping around they actually get foiled when it comes down to the time that it matters
great stuff alangrrbs,i really enjoyed that,cheers!!!
i think bosh improving/adding 3 point range to his game this past off-season and regular season was for the exact,precise purpose of being used in this very series obviously to draw hibbert away from the basket and nullify his impact at that end of the floor,clearing a little room in the paint for lebron and wade 2 do damage.....this much is fairly obvious and i think cud be the one definitive,deciding factor in the series out-come(tho,like others the notion that the heat cud be tipped up is mind-boggling to me at this stage,haha..by watever means necessary one gets the feeling they advance).
wat will be interesting is seeing how pacers combat this.clearly they will try and switch west onto bosh as he has better foot-speed/mobility.but then i imagine miami just puts another shooter on the floor to match up with hibbert and go small over-all.....watever the case i think miami will see it as critical to sumhow either get hibbert away from the rim-protecting role he serves so well,or on the bench,or in foul trouble.....we all saw the impact he had in last years series at the defensive end and if he can do likewise again this time it will go a long,long way to making this the grimy,dirty,physical arm-wrestle of a series that plays heavily in indianas favour....blocking shots,altering shots and generally deterring wade and james from attacking the basket as often as possible is,once again,the critical component in this series as i see it
0
great stuff alangrrbs,i really enjoyed that,cheers!!!
i think bosh improving/adding 3 point range to his game this past off-season and regular season was for the exact,precise purpose of being used in this very series obviously to draw hibbert away from the basket and nullify his impact at that end of the floor,clearing a little room in the paint for lebron and wade 2 do damage.....this much is fairly obvious and i think cud be the one definitive,deciding factor in the series out-come(tho,like others the notion that the heat cud be tipped up is mind-boggling to me at this stage,haha..by watever means necessary one gets the feeling they advance).
wat will be interesting is seeing how pacers combat this.clearly they will try and switch west onto bosh as he has better foot-speed/mobility.but then i imagine miami just puts another shooter on the floor to match up with hibbert and go small over-all.....watever the case i think miami will see it as critical to sumhow either get hibbert away from the rim-protecting role he serves so well,or on the bench,or in foul trouble.....we all saw the impact he had in last years series at the defensive end and if he can do likewise again this time it will go a long,long way to making this the grimy,dirty,physical arm-wrestle of a series that plays heavily in indianas favour....blocking shots,altering shots and generally deterring wade and james from attacking the basket as often as possible is,once again,the critical component in this series as i see it
Bb, you're wasting your time talking to these sports purists. They think the league is officiated without bias. They don't live in reality.
Agree. The NBA has a formula: Promote stars=Make Money. It is the closest thing to old time professional wrestling I've seen. Watch Lebron James storm the lane with his head down, knocking away everything in his path, and then getting the call with opponents on their backs in his wake. It is not basketball; it is a joke.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:
Bb, you're wasting your time talking to these sports purists. They think the league is officiated without bias. They don't live in reality.
Agree. The NBA has a formula: Promote stars=Make Money. It is the closest thing to old time professional wrestling I've seen. Watch Lebron James storm the lane with his head down, knocking away everything in his path, and then getting the call with opponents on their backs in his wake. It is not basketball; it is a joke.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.