The refs crapped out Raps in game 7 against Nets.
I am not a Raps fan but feel like you are giving Pacers way to much credit here. One could make similar argument that after blowing that game if they start slow here Pacers could fold.
This is a game with 2 teams that can go forever without scoring because they both rely way to much on 1-2 players. If DeRozan doesn't settle for jumpers then I think Raps win. George can only do so much.
I will have no money on it and love to see Toronto sports teams lose so BOL.
The refs crapped out Raps in game 7 against Nets.
I am not a Raps fan but feel like you are giving Pacers way to much credit here. One could make similar argument that after blowing that game if they start slow here Pacers could fold.
This is a game with 2 teams that can go forever without scoring because they both rely way to much on 1-2 players. If DeRozan doesn't settle for jumpers then I think Raps win. George can only do so much.
I will have no money on it and love to see Toronto sports teams lose so BOL.
The line has consistently moved down since it opened be it sharp or square money or both, and in this cap, I'm concerned with neither.
And I think you are jumping the gun about Toronto moving on, which they very well might and are in prime position to do up 3-2. This is game 6, a completely different world than game 7 at home. The Raps need to go 1-1 over the next 2. There is room for error. Not so much for the Pacers who need to go 2-0, are at home, are in their own game 7, have the best player, the best coach, the better defense and all this against a team that clearly is deeper and better overall, but has had 15 years of struggles as a culture for a reason.
I'll take the former over the latter.
Oh and Kyle Lowery hasn't just shot 30% in this series, he's shot 31% over his LAST 15 GAMES.
The line has consistently moved down since it opened be it sharp or square money or both, and in this cap, I'm concerned with neither.
And I think you are jumping the gun about Toronto moving on, which they very well might and are in prime position to do up 3-2. This is game 6, a completely different world than game 7 at home. The Raps need to go 1-1 over the next 2. There is room for error. Not so much for the Pacers who need to go 2-0, are at home, are in their own game 7, have the best player, the best coach, the better defense and all this against a team that clearly is deeper and better overall, but has had 15 years of struggles as a culture for a reason.
I'll take the former over the latter.
Oh and Kyle Lowery hasn't just shot 30% in this series, he's shot 31% over his LAST 15 GAMES.
When we cross that bridge Nil. Let's just talk about 6 tonight. 7 can't be capped, in reality or in theory' until 6 is finished.
When we cross that bridge Nil. Let's just talk about 6 tonight. 7 can't be capped, in reality or in theory' until 6 is finished.
The refs crapped out Raps in game 7 against Nets.
I am not a Raps fan but feel like you are giving Pacers way to much credit here. One could make similar argument that after blowing that game if they start slow here Pacers could fold.
This is a game with 2 teams that can go forever without scoring because they both rely way to much on 1-2 players. If DeRozan doesn't settle for jumpers then I think Raps win. George can only do so much.
I will have no money on it and love to see Toronto sports teams lose so BOL.
Not true Ben. Nets took the lead in the second quarter and never relinquised it.
If you are talking about the last drive and a foul on Paul, just look to this year and Wade two nights ago where the refs intentionally swallowed the whistle. They consistently tell us you have to earn it on the last play if you have the ball and are taking the game-winner. That hasn't changed for years minus a few controversial calls.
Derozan has been settling for jumpers all series and its clear Lowery is not going to take them to the promised land.
The Pacers are getting credit from me because we are getting an effective ML at home in an elimination game. That's pretty appealing with the best player, coach, defense and a team who's core has been battle-tested in these spots.
The refs crapped out Raps in game 7 against Nets.
I am not a Raps fan but feel like you are giving Pacers way to much credit here. One could make similar argument that after blowing that game if they start slow here Pacers could fold.
This is a game with 2 teams that can go forever without scoring because they both rely way to much on 1-2 players. If DeRozan doesn't settle for jumpers then I think Raps win. George can only do so much.
I will have no money on it and love to see Toronto sports teams lose so BOL.
Not true Ben. Nets took the lead in the second quarter and never relinquised it.
If you are talking about the last drive and a foul on Paul, just look to this year and Wade two nights ago where the refs intentionally swallowed the whistle. They consistently tell us you have to earn it on the last play if you have the ball and are taking the game-winner. That hasn't changed for years minus a few controversial calls.
Derozan has been settling for jumpers all series and its clear Lowery is not going to take them to the promised land.
The Pacers are getting credit from me because we are getting an effective ML at home in an elimination game. That's pretty appealing with the best player, coach, defense and a team who's core has been battle-tested in these spots.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.