All Forums | NBA Betting

Unbeliavableeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeee

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14159
Posts: 64
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #1
Ibaka is the focal point of OKC's defense. He is the rim protector they needed to disrupt Parker in the paint. Boy oh boy
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 7806
Posted: #2
It's called the agenda. 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #3
They werent winning anyways but wow that sux
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #4
Westbrook is now the leading rebounder on the team
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14898
Posted: #5
That's why I hate futures, LC.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14898
Posted: #6
Last year I lost a grand cause of Westbrook's injury.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 621
Posted: #7

He was a big part of holding down Blake last series ,this one hurts

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 12653
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by smartbets:

It's called the agenda. 
yup
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 414
Posted: #9
Scott Brooks being an idiot is more of a detriment than Ibaka being out. But yes this is terrible news for OKC
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14898
Posted: #10
More minutes for perkins! Ha ha ha.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 414
Posted: #11
Terry Stotts getting an extension should have been the content with that subject line LC
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #12
Giant play coming up. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2013
Posts: 3008
Posted: #13
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

Giant play coming up. 

Can't wait!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 31213
Posted: #14

TO ME

ITS irrelevant and I don't mean it like his injury doesn't hurt OKC..yes its HUGE but.........

I saw Spurs winning in 6 regardless

This just tips the scales a little more

GL rest of season

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 284
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

Giant play coming up. 

Time to make          lets get the book lc

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2013
Posts: 6715
Posted: #16
spurs the giant play?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 4174
Posted: #17
with all due respect - small advise: do not jump into quick conclusions and consider the following.
the spurs were a better team one way or another  - okc with ibaka or without. what happened now is just another break in building the 7 game series here as pop and the spurs will be toying with the thunder more than they would with ibaka playing. i know what i think the first game will go to and after consulting with my handicapping mentor and dear friend mk - the chances of the thunder taking game one grew a big deal
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 16153
Posted: #18
LC are using the angle of taking the team with one of star players out??? Dont do it if thats what ur thinking. I hope for ur sake ur huge bet is hedging ur okc bet to win it all
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 8897
Posted: #19
Still like OKC.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2014
Posts: 40
Posted: #20
Parker is going to live in the paint all series as long as his hamstring holds up
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14898
Posted: #21
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:

with all due respect - small advise: do not jump into quick conclusions and consider the following.
the spurs were a better team one way or another  - okc with ibaka or without. what happened now is just another break in building the 7 game series here as pop and the spurs will be toying with the thunder more than they would with ibaka playing. i know what i think the first game will go to and after consulting with my handicapping mentor and dear friend mk - the chances of the thunder taking game one grew a big deal



Not convinced that the Spurs will toy around with the Thunder, as you put it. If it was Westbrook or Durant sitting out, I'd understand this logic. The Thunder still have 2 of the top ten players in the world and the Spurs have none (unless you consider Parker as top ten). These guys ended the Spur's 19 game win streak. They ousted them from the playoffs in unceremonious fashion. They have beaten them the last 5 times they played. And you think the Spurs are gonna get cute with them and drop game one? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 4174
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:


Not convinced that the Spurs will toy around with the Thunder, as you put it. If it was Westbrook or Durant sitting out, I'd understand this logic. The Thunder still have 2 of the top ten players in the world and the Spurs have none (unless you consider Parker as top ten). These guys ended the Spur's 19 game win streak. They ousted them from the playoffs in unceremonious fashion. They have beaten them the last 5 times they played. And you think the Spurs are gonna get cute with them and drop game one? 

if the logic you're trying to apply here would really work - the pacers, the spurs, the heat and the thunder would be well after two easy 4-0 wins in round one and two. did you really believe that the wizards could tickle the pacers best defensive team? or that the clippers could really take games in okc? memphis taking okc to game seven? nets taking a game away from heat? the hawks taking the pacers to game seven as dallas taking the spurs to game seven? trailblazers taking the game from the spurs?
this is nba. it is entertainment and the players are professional players. professional!!!
the spurs are in a great form but read what was the bottom line of what i wrote - okc taking game 1!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 450
Posted: #23
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:


Not convinced that the Spurs will toy around with the Thunder, as you put it. If it was Westbrook or Durant sitting out, I'd understand this logic. The Thunder still have 2 of the top ten players in the world and the Spurs have none (unless you consider Parker as top ten). These guys ended the Spur's 19 game win streak. They ousted them from the playoffs in unceremonious fashion. They have beaten them the last 5 times they played. And you think the Spurs are gonna get cute with them and drop game one? 


spurs got real cute with the mavs going to 7

okc - ibaka > mavs
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14898
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by stakz:



spurs got real cute with the mavs going to 7

okc - ibaka > mavs

Why am I wasting my time with you people. The Spurs had beaten Dallas the last ten times, they have lost to the Thunder the last five times. Do you see a difference there?
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 14898
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:


if the logic you're trying to apply here would really work - the pacers, the spurs, the heat and the thunder would be well after two easy 4-0 wins in round one and two. did you really believe that the wizards could tickle the pacers best defensive team? or that the clippers could really take games in okc? memphis taking okc to game seven? nets taking a game away from heat? the hawks taking the pacers to game seven as dallas taking the spurs to game seven? trailblazers taking the game from the spurs?
this is nba. it is entertainment and the players are professional players. professional!!!
the spurs are in a great form but read what was the bottom line of what i wrote - okc taking game 1!!!

Phix, you simply can't lump all those games together. Each was its own entity. I could get into each one and tell you what I thought would happen and what ended up happening, but that would take a lot of time. Take my word when I say that none of those results (except maybe the Mavs in games 1 and 2) surprised me much, if at all. And I get the fact that the players are professional entertainers! If your argument is that the Spurs will lose this game for entertainment value, then you'll have to explain why, and I'll have to decide if I agree or disagree. But if your  argument is that the Spurs will lose because they will not take the Thunder seriously (cause they are missing their 3rd best player) then I'm not buying.
All Forums | NBA Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.