-OK I get it, Jaguars elite defense blah blah but look who's at qb. Major handicap and major flaw for the team is Blake Bottles. This team will never be a superbowl contender with that guy. He holds them back and defense has to carry him to win games. Panics too much, throwing mechanics and motion look terrible, and with him it's one read and then take off. When people who actually know football say Jaguars are a qb away from winning the superbowl they couldn't be more right.
-Bad bad matchup for Jacksonville where they will get exposed. On offense they are missing their lead back Fournette and are becoming too predictable and one dimensional. Team doesn't even have much faith in Bottles, many designed 'safe' plays to match his limited skillset, short passes, bootlegs, and plays where he only has to make one read with a easy checkdown to the full back. Definite 100% proof right there he is very limited. Some are even plays that are like the ones beginners use on Madden. It's ridiculous.
-On defense eeven worse matchup. This is not Eli Manning or Tom Brady who are just going to sit in the pocket and not go anywhere. We've all seen what Mahomes can do. He can evade the rush and move out of the pocket and make plays. If he was able to go on the road at altitude, escape against Von Miller and make plays, trust me he'll do the same here against a pass rush that's not as good as Denver. The secondary is only good if the pass rush gets there and it won't matter in this game once coverage breaks down and Mahomes moves out of the pocket. Look what Mariota did to them. Same reason they lost to Mariota is same reason they'll lose to the Chiefs.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
CHIEFS ML
LOCK OF THE YEAR (No way Jaguars win this game)
-OK I get it, Jaguars elite defense blah blah but look who's at qb. Major handicap and major flaw for the team is Blake Bottles. This team will never be a superbowl contender with that guy. He holds them back and defense has to carry him to win games. Panics too much, throwing mechanics and motion look terrible, and with him it's one read and then take off. When people who actually know football say Jaguars are a qb away from winning the superbowl they couldn't be more right.
-Bad bad matchup for Jacksonville where they will get exposed. On offense they are missing their lead back Fournette and are becoming too predictable and one dimensional. Team doesn't even have much faith in Bottles, many designed 'safe' plays to match his limited skillset, short passes, bootlegs, and plays where he only has to make one read with a easy checkdown to the full back. Definite 100% proof right there he is very limited. Some are even plays that are like the ones beginners use on Madden. It's ridiculous.
-On defense eeven worse matchup. This is not Eli Manning or Tom Brady who are just going to sit in the pocket and not go anywhere. We've all seen what Mahomes can do. He can evade the rush and move out of the pocket and make plays. If he was able to go on the road at altitude, escape against Von Miller and make plays, trust me he'll do the same here against a pass rush that's not as good as Denver. The secondary is only good if the pass rush gets there and it won't matter in this game once coverage breaks down and Mahomes moves out of the pocket. Look what Mariota did to them. Same reason they lost to Mariota is same reason they'll lose to the Chiefs.
ML and you call it "play of the year"??? You make yourself look very stupid.
-140 for Chiefs ML is not bad odds. -3 you can take it but it's not as sure as ML. I can never be too sure if theyll win by 3 or more but I'm sure they win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ChicagoFun:
ML and you call it "play of the year"??? You make yourself look very stupid.
-140 for Chiefs ML is not bad odds. -3 you can take it but it's not as sure as ML. I can never be too sure if theyll win by 3 or more but I'm sure they win.
Agree with ChicagoFun. If you're really that confident Chiefs win, then shouldn't you like them to cover -3 with hardly any juice?
I will a tad on -3. But the thing is I'm making a huge bet so if I can get -140 on ML or better I'm fine with that and I'll take it. They can always dirt the spread so don't want to risk it. I will wait for price to go up on ML as people will hammer Jags.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RyanOJ24:
Agree with ChicagoFun. If you're really that confident Chiefs win, then shouldn't you like them to cover -3 with hardly any juice?
I will a tad on -3. But the thing is I'm making a huge bet so if I can get -140 on ML or better I'm fine with that and I'll take it. They can always dirt the spread so don't want to risk it. I will wait for price to go up on ML as people will hammer Jags.
This OP is hilarious. So let me get this straight.....I’d say maybe 5% took the Bills to win outright against the Vikings in Minnesota. I guess the 95% are pure idiots huh? Too funny. Now in reading this....the OP wants to say that the chiefs are hands down gonna best the jaguars. That may happen but stating that those who take the jaguars are essentially idiots.....give me a break. This site and the antics....At least I got a good laugh in from this.
0
This OP is hilarious. So let me get this straight.....I’d say maybe 5% took the Bills to win outright against the Vikings in Minnesota. I guess the 95% are pure idiots huh? Too funny. Now in reading this....the OP wants to say that the chiefs are hands down gonna best the jaguars. That may happen but stating that those who take the jaguars are essentially idiots.....give me a break. This site and the antics....At least I got a good laugh in from this.
Minnesota broke the bank for a QB and look what happened so far. The Jags are fine with Blake even without Fournette. Stop with that narrative. In big games always take the elite defense.
0
Minnesota broke the bank for a QB and look what happened so far. The Jags are fine with Blake even without Fournette. Stop with that narrative. In big games always take the elite defense.
Applaud you for posting. But 1) bortles holding them back - you don’t say! Damnit I thought he was jags best weapon.... 2) jags can’t win Super Bowl - why is that part of this equation.... that’s all I really care to read since you’ve already lost the plot.... interesting game, it’s gotta be jags or no play... chiefs won by 4 in Denver, and lucky to have done so... if Denver D could do what it did for 3Qs, what do you think Jags D is going to do... bortles looks like playoff bortles against bad Ds... chiefs could take it but give me live dog at +3
0
Applaud you for posting. But 1) bortles holding them back - you don’t say! Damnit I thought he was jags best weapon.... 2) jags can’t win Super Bowl - why is that part of this equation.... that’s all I really care to read since you’ve already lost the plot.... interesting game, it’s gotta be jags or no play... chiefs won by 4 in Denver, and lucky to have done so... if Denver D could do what it did for 3Qs, what do you think Jags D is going to do... bortles looks like playoff bortles against bad Ds... chiefs could take it but give me live dog at +3
This OP is hilarious. So let me get this straight.....I’d say maybe 5% took the Bills to win outright against the Vikings in Minnesota. I guess the 95% are pure idiots huh? Too funny. Now in reading this....the OP wants to say that the chiefs are hands down gonna best the jaguars. That may happen but stating that those who take the jaguars are essentially idiots.....give me a break. This site and the antics....At least I got a good laugh in from this.
Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
0
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
This OP is hilarious. So let me get this straight.....I’d say maybe 5% took the Bills to win outright against the Vikings in Minnesota. I guess the 95% are pure idiots huh? Too funny. Now in reading this....the OP wants to say that the chiefs are hands down gonna best the jaguars. That may happen but stating that those who take the jaguars are essentially idiots.....give me a break. This site and the antics....At least I got a good laugh in from this.
Bortles is the #1 Fantasy QB the last 10 games dating back to last year so you’re not really that accurate. The offense also opens up when Fournette is out. The Chiefs D is barely there. Do the math.
0
Bortles is the #1 Fantasy QB the last 10 games dating back to last year so you’re not really that accurate. The offense also opens up when Fournette is out. The Chiefs D is barely there. Do the math.
I've seen posts like this so many times and they almost always end the same way.....in a loss. The fact that you are taking the Chiefs straight up makes this even funnier. If you are so confident bet the spread.
I've been leaning Jags this whole week...seeing posts like this makes me feel even more confident.
0
I've seen posts like this so many times and they almost always end the same way.....in a loss. The fact that you are taking the Chiefs straight up makes this even funnier. If you are so confident bet the spread.
I've been leaning Jags this whole week...seeing posts like this makes me feel even more confident.
Now now, we know the drill. If a posted play loses, he no come back to post updates and brag. Dust in the wind
I like my homies at home still. Illl even give you 6.5. once in a blue moon, you get a team going undefeated. It is all about riding with them till the end and bank.
Until otherwise, Denver defense is about as tough as is. Jax, you are next.
X_____________________________
0
Now now, we know the drill. If a posted play loses, he no come back to post updates and brag. Dust in the wind
I like my homies at home still. Illl even give you 6.5. once in a blue moon, you get a team going undefeated. It is all about riding with them till the end and bank.
Until otherwise, Denver defense is about as tough as is. Jax, you are next.
KC on a short week ... major battle Monday night against Denver... good Denver D did a nice job against the high powered KC O .. Jags D much better and will give KC all it can handle.... KC D is suspect .. will jags win I dont care ... will they cover maybe.... not sure I’ll play this game but if I did I’d take Jacksonville
0
KC on a short week ... major battle Monday night against Denver... good Denver D did a nice job against the high powered KC O .. Jags D much better and will give KC all it can handle.... KC D is suspect .. will jags win I dont care ... will they cover maybe.... not sure I’ll play this game but if I did I’d take Jacksonville
KC on a short week ... major battle Monday night against Denver... good Denver D did a nice job against the high powered KC O .. Jags D much better and will give KC all it can handle.... KC D is suspect .. will jags win I dont care ... will they cover maybe.... not sure I’ll play this game but if I did I’d take Jacksonville
100% agree. No Fournette will have Bortles throwing all over KC D. Also KC has Brady & Co on deck. Which NE will have 10 days to prepare for I ll be on NE that night too
0
Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:
KC on a short week ... major battle Monday night against Denver... good Denver D did a nice job against the high powered KC O .. Jags D much better and will give KC all it can handle.... KC D is suspect .. will jags win I dont care ... will they cover maybe.... not sure I’ll play this game but if I did I’d take Jacksonville
100% agree. No Fournette will have Bortles throwing all over KC D. Also KC has Brady & Co on deck. Which NE will have 10 days to prepare for I ll be on NE that night too
Just wondering why most guys talk crap about guys taking ML- what’s better a win? Or a lost ? Sometimes ML is the right play clowns
I don't mind the ML play if the price is right, relative to laying the points. So essentially buying 2.5 points for 30 cents isn't bad. Obviously you win less (or risk more).
OP says whoever is betting Jags "doesn't know football" and gives a blah blah blah write up about stuff literally every dlckhead with google can find out. This is by far the biggest test for the KC offense, who has looked amazing so far. But the Mahomes honeymoon will end at some point. I mean he has ZERO INT's so far, how long do you think that will last? Also, as mentioned above, they just played on Monday in Denver in a tough come from behind game, and now get a legit team who has looked good in all but one game this year. Chiefs aren't going undefeated this year, and this is going to be a test. Their D has shown some major holes.
BOL...stay humble.
ps- They WERE a Super Bowl contender last year with Blake Bortles, so not sure what you mean. I realize they didn't make it, not all CONTENDERS do, but that statement is abhorrently false. You may win, you may lose, but your write up reeks of someone trying to spin things to justify a play.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ikid2groove035:
Just wondering why most guys talk crap about guys taking ML- what’s better a win? Or a lost ? Sometimes ML is the right play clowns
I don't mind the ML play if the price is right, relative to laying the points. So essentially buying 2.5 points for 30 cents isn't bad. Obviously you win less (or risk more).
OP says whoever is betting Jags "doesn't know football" and gives a blah blah blah write up about stuff literally every dlckhead with google can find out. This is by far the biggest test for the KC offense, who has looked amazing so far. But the Mahomes honeymoon will end at some point. I mean he has ZERO INT's so far, how long do you think that will last? Also, as mentioned above, they just played on Monday in Denver in a tough come from behind game, and now get a legit team who has looked good in all but one game this year. Chiefs aren't going undefeated this year, and this is going to be a test. Their D has shown some major holes.
BOL...stay humble.
ps- They WERE a Super Bowl contender last year with Blake Bortles, so not sure what you mean. I realize they didn't make it, not all CONTENDERS do, but that statement is abhorrently false. You may win, you may lose, but your write up reeks of someone trying to spin things to justify a play.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.