All Forums | NFL Betting

Are you F-Kidding Me? Bears WILL WIN

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 11016
Posts: 164
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 223
Posted: #51
looks like someone is a Raider hater. Don't underestimate THE RAIDERS!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 3141
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by Spooker:


Listen asshole - Carson Palmer IS A BACKUP QB as well.

He didn't even have a job over summer since he is such a fucking dumbass and cost Bengals over 7 Games last year with his ineptness. 

This Game has Bookie dirt all over it. You think Chicago gonna just lie down and lose to this crap team. I seen the Raiders in Games they won. They are a low win probability team against anyone they play. 

The Bears imo were a chance to upset the Packers in the NFC. They still are. And before you contest this opinion - how many times have you been screwed by +800 teams by going for easy money.

Just be aware I pick upsets. I picked the Seahawks to beat Saints last year in the Playoffs, I picked NY Giants to knock off Packers 3 weeks ago, I even picked Rams to beat Saints over some 6 weeks ago. I been doing this for 5 years and I pick upsets.

How and Why? Because I know what teams and players are like. I have the instincts. They may not be right 20% of the time but I got 80% to ride shotgun with.

It seem like you can't stop talking about yourself so how did that Gaints vs Packers game workout for you

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 3117
Posted: #53
I dont think the Bears or Cutler is getting nearly enough credit from anyone here.  The Bears could be the 2nd best team in the NFC with Cutler.  What do these guys have to do?  NFC Championship last year with the 2nd best record in the the NFC (maybe best I am not positive).  Now they continue to win and have only lost to the Saints, Packers, and Lions.  With Cutler this team is for real.  Now without I just feel like the Lions might be in the playoffs 100% as a result of Jay Cutler being out.  He is so valuable to that offense and Matt Forte you will all see very soon...
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 511
Posted: #54
Quote Originally Posted by mrquija27:

I dont think the Bears or Cutler is getting nearly enough credit from anyone here.  The Bears could be the 2nd best team in the NFC with Cutler.  What do these guys have to do?  NFC Championship last year with the 2nd best record in the the NFC (maybe best I am not positive).  Now they continue to win and have only lost to the Saints, Packers, and Lions.  With Cutler this team is for real.  Now without I just feel like the Lions might be in the playoffs 100% as a result of Jay Cutler being out.  He is so valuable to that offense and Matt Forte you will all see very soon...


At least someone knows real Football

I also have money on the Lions to beat Packers +6.

Nation love Green Bay. Nation is going to get smacked in the kisser if they don't start getting smart soon. Green Bay won't cover
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 511
Posted: #55
Quote Originally Posted by mojo10:

Carson Palmer is a BACKUP as well??  He left Cincy as the starter due to a contract dispute & joined the Raiders as the starter because they lost their QB due to injury. Sooooo he left Cincy as a starter & joined the raiders as a starter yet he's a BACKUP You are hopeless



He was a backup to Boller after Campbell got injued you fucking person faece.

Carson Palmer is a fucking backstabbing piece of shit that the Bengals did not release due to contractual reasons but also so they could acquire a 1st round draft via a trade as opposed to letting him walk with the money from the remainder of his contract and getting nothing. That was the rumour when I was in Cincy last year u fuck


 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 511
Posted: #56
Anyways - I'll let my Record speak for itself. I don't have time to come here arguing and I get insulted during the day when I'm sleeping. It's not fair you guys have a swipe at my intellect.

People been picking on me all my life because I was too tall or too big. Now I get insults on my NFL picks.

5-2-1 is my NFL Record since I joined. I win alot of money and that Record doesn't include my ML Parlay bets either.

Anyway, I don't like to argue during Thanksgiving but will resume hostilitys after it if thats how you guys want to play

Happy Thanksgiving everyone




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 3042
Posted: #57
10th vs run and 27th vs pass is not elite defense, IMO Hanie may catch a break this week due to injuries to the Oakland defensive line. Barring turnovers from either QB i think whoever has the best game between Forte and Bush will decide the winner.

Raider fan here so may be bias, also pulling for CP to have another few good years at QB for Oak
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 1594
Posted: #58
People are really going to realize just how talented Cutler was now that he is out and the sub-par Chicago receivers won't get the ball put right in their hands -- which they still managed to drop a lot of the time. 
Chris
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2006
Posts: 430
Posted: #59
Two streaking teams.  This is very difficult to predict.  It is really going to come down to the team that makes the fewest mistakes.  Manley being out definitely sways the special team debate fairly equally.  This is going to be a very competitive game.  Seeing that to be true, it's not a bad shot to take the odds on the ML
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 8951
Posted: #60
You guys know they were going after Ottoman for a backup right?Haine played well against the Pack last year when Jay went out and this was with Violins taking all the reps in practice
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 11845
Posted: #61
Bears looks like the best play of this weekend in the NFL... either that or Houston...

Bears (+4.5) against Oakland?  HA!!!


this line is a sham... you put your money on Oakland, you will be questioning your capping ability by the 2nd quarter...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 4190
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by bucknuts:

Love the fan boys of other teams coming in threads to knock Bears

This dude was one of the folks claiming Cutler trade set Bears back years and would be finishing in the bottom of our division for next decade...lol

Minny and Detoilet fans

Go ahead and write Chi off thats worked out well up to this point...how about Denver cuttn Orton and now headed to KC where Mcdummys dreamboat QB Cassel is....can you tell me again how Bears got robbed...

LOL

Yep, the same guy that bet you that the Vikings would beat the Bears record wise in 2009, where the loser was to leave covers for good.  Looks like you kept your part of the bargain homeslice.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 4190
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by grins1010:


You must be watching AFC games my friend.

Yeah you're right.  I only watch games where there is only AFC vs AFC matchups.  Stop being an idiot.  It's a subjective opinion.  That guy in your profile pic you?  I wouldn't doubt it judging from that post kid.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 8951
Posted: #64
Wow...where did u come up with that shit?We had no such bet...though I was wrong on the record..they got there in 2010 though didn't they....not sitting at the bottom of the division as u predicted...
All I know is there was a ton of y'all claiming the Bears were robbed in the trade and it set them back yrs..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 163
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by pj702:

oakland going to the super bowl dont know if you go the memo yet, but al davis angel came and carson palmer leads oakland to super bowl watch and see. the will be a 3 seed win first game, upset the 2 seed and boom super bowl da RAIDERS


I thought i was the only drunk one!   
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 17423
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:

Slow your roll...............the Bears will have a tough time winning in Oakland. Dont know about the spread but the Raiders win this game SU imo. Everyone will see how much the Bears will suffer not having Cutler. Bears still have a good defense but it wont stop Palmer & the Raiders from scoring.

I can see Hanie throwing a few picks.............Raiders 24-17
    Well spoken
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 3654
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by Spooker:

Yeah sure they lost Jay, but you think this means they start losing Games against average teams with worst QBs like Carson Palmer???

Bears have an elite Defense and can score through the run as much as through the pass.

Chad Henne will be competent and has 3 training sessions and some to know what the Bears require.

Bears win this outright going away.

I also like the BEARS this weekend.....Ron Winters white hat....dogs are 6-1-3 ats with him.....Bol dude.... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 3310
Posted: #68
bears are still a good team without cutler. i can't cap a raiders game to save my life. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 3099
Posted: #69
Bears
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 3948
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by MJ2345:



B4 Cutler got hurt the Bears better than the Lions and NYG.I would rank them 4th in the NFC
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 1580
Posted: #71
 bears ya right lmao
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 9485
Posted: #72
I'm playing oak under

no care if da bears show up or not but with qb changes, no one is going to score.   I mean no one.  LOL

get ready for the punt game for practice until time runs out. 
X_____________________________
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 305
Posted: #73
With Jay Cutler that game would've been a walk through the park for the Bears, I really like this teams last few weeks, after the loss to the LIons, they were hot, but now without Jay I really don't feel comfortable with this game. Don't wanna go against the Bears, but Carson Palmer is not as shitty as Spooker wrote - yes, he's not top notch QB, but he still threw some good passes last 2 weeks, and with that running game the Raiders have - this game is a mystery to me. I think it might be won by the Bears d-fence and it will probably go under, maybe a slight edge for Chicago here, but still I think under 41.5 is the best play here. And Spooker, you may pick a lot of underdog wins, but the Giants didn't beat the Packers (no one has so far this season) they beat the Patriots (god damn them). What about other dogs this week? Think Minnesota have a chance? I personally think that Tampa is going to win that game vs the Titans and am thinking big money there.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 549
Posted: #74

No play 4 me but  that kid  Caleb Henne looked pretty fuckn good against the Pack in the NFC Championship game.Bears win a squeaker 24-20 jus my opinion

 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 141
Posted: #75
Go Leafs Go !!!
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.