Found 2 games earlier in the season where 1U teams were facing each other as opponents. So, that means we can take away 2 1U wins and 2 1U losses, as we would not have played those games at the time.
That means, YTD we are: 1U: 27-18 2U: 15-4
This week there are 4 1U teams that are facing each other in 2 games. So, 4 of our picks are knocked off the board (ten,was,kcc,ari). The remaining picks are:
1U: min +3.5 (buy .5 pt if have to) pit -7.5 nyg +3.5
2U: car +10.5
Good luck to all.
0
Found 2 games earlier in the season where 1U teams were facing each other as opponents. So, that means we can take away 2 1U wins and 2 1U losses, as we would not have played those games at the time.
That means, YTD we are: 1U: 27-18 2U: 15-4
This week there are 4 1U teams that are facing each other in 2 games. So, 4 of our picks are knocked off the board (ten,was,kcc,ari). The remaining picks are:
1U: min +3.5 (buy .5 pt if have to) pit -7.5 nyg +3.5
Week 12 Board ... the one Thanksgiving play is cin:
1U: cin +8.5 car +10.5 ari +0.5
2U: nyg -7.5
3U (1U & 2U): min +2.5 ten +0.5 ?
The ari game is actually a 1U (sff) vs. a 2U (ari), so ari gets bumped from a 2U to a 1U play just by mathematical cancellation, and of course, sff becomes a no-play.
Good luck everyone and Happy Thanksgiving.
0
YTD -- 1U: 28-20 -- 2U: 15-5
Week 12 Board ... the one Thanksgiving play is cin:
1U: cin +8.5 car +10.5 ari +0.5
2U: nyg -7.5
3U (1U & 2U): min +2.5 ten +0.5 ?
The ari game is actually a 1U (sff) vs. a 2U (ari), so ari gets bumped from a 2U to a 1U play just by mathematical cancellation, and of course, sff becomes a no-play.
Well, this is going to seem kind of silly, but I'm going to do a 180 and remove the clause from the system that made us lessen the exposure to the Week 13 Tennessee loss.
We're going to go with the theory that the more a team loses ATS, the more attractive a play they become. So, we are going to absorb that original ten -3.5 loss, and then play them again vs. Indy, which means that our Indy -3.5 2U loss is wiped out, and we will also get a ten +3.5 win for 1U on top of that.
Soooo ..... we will change our 1U record from 34-24 to 34-25. Then, we will convert our ind -3.5 2U play last night to a ten +3.5 1U play, which is a win. Don't ask why this happens. It just does.
Now, our YTD record will be: 1U: 35-25 2U: 19-9
I'll follow up tomorrow with Sunday's plays.
0
Well, this is going to seem kind of silly, but I'm going to do a 180 and remove the clause from the system that made us lessen the exposure to the Week 13 Tennessee loss.
We're going to go with the theory that the more a team loses ATS, the more attractive a play they become. So, we are going to absorb that original ten -3.5 loss, and then play them again vs. Indy, which means that our Indy -3.5 2U loss is wiped out, and we will also get a ten +3.5 win for 1U on top of that.
Soooo ..... we will change our 1U record from 34-24 to 34-25. Then, we will convert our ind -3.5 2U play last night to a ten +3.5 1U play, which is a win. Don't ask why this happens. It just does.
1U: was +1.5 W buf pk W car +7.5 L sdc -6.5 W nyj -5.5 L
2U: ari +4.5 W
Week: 1U: 3-2 2U: 1-0
YTD: 1U: 38-27 2U: 20-9
Been reading your thread, curious how the Jets could have been a play against the Phins. The Phins lost the prior week to the Browns straight up - they were favored by 3.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tuttleberry:
Thx for the support, harley and k4.
Let's tally the results
1U: was +1.5 W buf pk W car +7.5 L sdc -6.5 W nyj -5.5 L
2U: ari +4.5 W
Week: 1U: 3-2 2U: 1-0
YTD: 1U: 38-27 2U: 20-9
Been reading your thread, curious how the Jets could have been a play against the Phins. The Phins lost the prior week to the Browns straight up - they were favored by 3.
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
Thanks for the interest.
0
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
Thanks for the interest.
Thanks much for the explanation - think your system is something that makes alot of sense. I was doing something similar awhile back - one other thing that I was taking into consideration is turnover margins for the previous game. If a team was a bouncback team PLUS their turnover margin was equal to or preferably worse than the team they were playing - it qualified as a play.
Only thing im not 100% clear on is your 2U criteria? I saw you mention bye week, so its for teams coming off byes. What is the other piece im missing?
Thanks Buddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by tuttleberry:
rob3996: The setup for the system is a team must lose by more 10 or more vs. the spread. The Jets were a setup after losing 45-3, and the Phins were not a setup as they lost by less than 10 vs. the spread.
Byharley: a 3U play happens if a team loses by 10 or more vs. the spread twice in a row.
The 3U record YTD is a combo of the 1U and 2U record. I honestly don't know what it is, but I'm confident the win pct is at least 60% and probably higher than that.
Thanks for the interest.
Thanks much for the explanation - think your system is something that makes alot of sense. I was doing something similar awhile back - one other thing that I was taking into consideration is turnover margins for the previous game. If a team was a bouncback team PLUS their turnover margin was equal to or preferably worse than the team they were playing - it qualified as a play.
Only thing im not 100% clear on is your 2U criteria? I saw you mention bye week, so its for teams coming off byes. What is the other piece im missing?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.