Posted:
#1
2019 Record: 1-1
Units: +24.86
Here's what I'm seeing with one:
I'm seeing Annie Wilkes in her bed watching Chuck Woolery on Love Connection with popcorn bits falling all over her bathrobe.
I'm seeing Robert person got as the contestant. (I'm serious. It's a REAL name.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8JQdSHf23Zo
What?
I'll make it clear: She's sitting on her as* on a junk food bonanza while the sheriff closes in on her for kidnapping Paul Sheldon.
Just like the Saints...
Drew Brees and Alvin Kamara and 90% of this team haven't taken a snap (or a meaningful one if they got reps in Week 17) in TWENTY ONE DAYS.
You saw what the Cowboys did in Week 17. They went for it. They beat the Giants in a thriller and then they needed every ounce of that carryover win to help them beat the game Seahawks (a game I was so wary of I waited for ALL the points to come off the board and grabbed the ML only).
Why? There are VERY thin margins in playoff football. Forget the blowouts and dominance. There is too much riding on these games for it to be lopsided making points EXTREMELY valuable. I couldn't even lay a MEAGER 2.5 vs. the Hawks and with good reason!
Well Scal, what about the Chiefs "blowout" today?
That was NOT a blowout. If not for a completely bogus roughing the kicker call on a last Chiefs punt, the ball goes back to Indy and KC would be in prevent D, letting Indy drain the clock and possibly score for a backdoor cover +4.5 of 20-24 (or even 19-24 as the line was as high as +5.5). Don't be fooled by that score. Highly misleading.
And even the Rams game covered by minuscule .5. With a debate from Clubdirt on the two pt conversion first instead of second possibly leading to a cover. But the real debate starts with why McVay went for it on 4th and 1 instead of going up two scores. I don't want to debate that (I know the answer) but really, in the playoffs?
If he just kicks it Dallas covers. Again VERY thin spread margins.
And before these two games, 14-1 Dog Winners ATS in the previous 15 games.
So points are king in the playoffs, at least the past two years. You can talk about regression but I'll take the post I made last week where I lined up every W for dogs since 2017 (14 of them) to ONE loss (Titans lose to Pats last year SU and ATS). And today if not for a questionable coach's call on the goal line and a roughing the kicker call, this could very well be 16-1 ATS Dogs in the last 17, or at least 15-2.
That's JUST talking about the points ALONE, for argumentation's sake, which are at +8 right now.
We haven't even gotten to the teams! And what about them...?
0
Hot Forum Topics
