why can't AZ go back , as long as Warner gets some rest they can beat either minn or no in a dome game in jan no?
Nice One
Nice One
Nice One
i think the viks are a for sure conferece championship team they can run they can pass and they can play defense as well this is not a one deminsional team if they cant beat you in one way they can beat you in another. with Brett farve runing the show you always have a chance to win not to mention the Rookie of the year hopeful percy harvin.
i think the viks are a for sure conferece championship team they can run they can pass and they can play defense as well this is not a one deminsional team if they cant beat you in one way they can beat you in another. with Brett farve runing the show you always have a chance to win not to mention the Rookie of the year hopeful percy harvin.
two of these four teams will be in the super bowl this year......and in a neutral site anybody can beat anybody........
steelers colts vikings saints.........if everybody is healthy come playoff time of course
two of these four teams will be in the super bowl this year......and in a neutral site anybody can beat anybody........
steelers colts vikings saints.........if everybody is healthy come playoff time of course
Nice One
sure why not??? what makes new orelans a world beater or the vikings for that matter
the AZ defense is actually better this year and they have done nothing wrong since the bye (6-1) , they lost to carolina in a big time revenge game , arguably carolina's best game of the year
warner will have to be 100% , and that is a ? at this time , but , might be ready for jan
Nice One
sure why not??? what makes new orelans a world beater or the vikings for that matter
the AZ defense is actually better this year and they have done nothing wrong since the bye (6-1) , they lost to carolina in a big time revenge game , arguably carolina's best game of the year
warner will have to be 100% , and that is a ? at this time , but , might be ready for jan
sure why not??? what makes new orelans a world beater or the vikings for that matter
the AZ defense is actually better this year and they have done nothing wrong since the bye (6-1) , they lost to carolina in a big time revenge game , arguably carolina's best game of the year
warner will have to be 100% , and that is a ? at this time , but , might be ready for jan
To be honest, I really like what San Diego is doing, If San Diego meet Indy again I will put my money on SD. As for Ari, they are just missing something, no pass rusher no true rushing game, although Beanie looked good a couple of games. He will suffer an injury soon though.
sure why not??? what makes new orelans a world beater or the vikings for that matter
the AZ defense is actually better this year and they have done nothing wrong since the bye (6-1) , they lost to carolina in a big time revenge game , arguably carolina's best game of the year
warner will have to be 100% , and that is a ? at this time , but , might be ready for jan
To be honest, I really like what San Diego is doing, If San Diego meet Indy again I will put my money on SD. As for Ari, they are just missing something, no pass rusher no true rushing game, although Beanie looked good a couple of games. He will suffer an injury soon though.
sure why not??? what makes new orelans a world beater or the vikings for that matter
the AZ defense is actually better this year and they have done nothing wrong since the bye (6-1) , they lost to carolina in a big time revenge game , arguably carolina's best game of the year
warner will have to be 100% , and that is a ? at this time , but , might be ready for jan
I also think that youguys were a fluke by getting to the bowl, if McNabb grew a pair you would have loss. The Sb will be Saints Vs. Cincy or NE
sure why not??? what makes new orelans a world beater or the vikings for that matter
the AZ defense is actually better this year and they have done nothing wrong since the bye (6-1) , they lost to carolina in a big time revenge game , arguably carolina's best game of the year
warner will have to be 100% , and that is a ? at this time , but , might be ready for jan
I also think that youguys were a fluke by getting to the bowl, if McNabb grew a pair you would have loss. The Sb will be Saints Vs. Cincy or NE
Is this thread still going? I checked it out a few days ago and didn't even bother to comment because it was thrash along with saintsfan. Dude you need to check your biased views at the door as this is a gambling site and being a homer will only cost you money in the long run. Take it from someone who knows. I am ashamed to say that I am a Bills fan. Don't laugh at me... well I guess you can. LOL as I laugh and cry at myself. BOL!
Is this thread still going? I checked it out a few days ago and didn't even bother to comment because it was thrash along with saintsfan. Dude you need to check your biased views at the door as this is a gambling site and being a homer will only cost you money in the long run. Take it from someone who knows. I am ashamed to say that I am a Bills fan. Don't laugh at me... well I guess you can. LOL as I laugh and cry at myself. BOL!
I also think that youguys were a fluke by getting to the bowl, if McNabb grew a pair you would have loss. The Sb will be Saints Vs. Cincy or NE
what about the eagle def , or that matter the pitt def - this team came within :90 seconds of winning the super bowl , the defense is better this year and the running game is starting to click....any no or minn fan that does not think that this team can win big game on the road in a dome in jan is kidding themselves
I also think that youguys were a fluke by getting to the bowl, if McNabb grew a pair you would have loss. The Sb will be Saints Vs. Cincy or NE
what about the eagle def , or that matter the pitt def - this team came within :90 seconds of winning the super bowl , the defense is better this year and the running game is starting to click....any no or minn fan that does not think that this team can win big game on the road in a dome in jan is kidding themselves
what about the eagle def , or that matter the pitt def - this team came within :90 seconds of winning the super bowl , the defense is better this year and the running game is starting to click....any no or minn fan that does not think that this team can win big game on the road in a dome in jan is kidding themselves
I always thought that the PIT TD before the end of the first half was the final straw but AZ came back. Give them credit but it is what it is.
what about the eagle def , or that matter the pitt def - this team came within :90 seconds of winning the super bowl , the defense is better this year and the running game is starting to click....any no or minn fan that does not think that this team can win big game on the road in a dome in jan is kidding themselves
I always thought that the PIT TD before the end of the first half was the final straw but AZ came back. Give them credit but it is what it is.
i know they lost , they battled and lost , but no one stopped them last year , not pitt , not philly or caolina ....i haven't seen anything out of the viking or saint defense that shows me they can stop AZ's offense
for them to not even be considered in the mix to go back to the sb is a joke at this point - favre is a t/o machine in the playoffs and drew brees and never done it in a big spot , writing them off at this point is a mistake
i know they lost , they battled and lost , but no one stopped them last year , not pitt , not philly or caolina ....i haven't seen anything out of the viking or saint defense that shows me they can stop AZ's offense
for them to not even be considered in the mix to go back to the sb is a joke at this point - favre is a t/o machine in the playoffs and drew brees and never done it in a big spot , writing them off at this point is a mistake
You are supposed to have these stats, you already have a guy that is really from Minny,(not Chi town or fukn South Dakota who is still using netzero) saying that your schedule is softer than ours.
You didn't answer the questions. I am curious as to what your answers will be (well not curious, I just want a good laugh to be honest).
Who gives a fuck about schedules anyways! You aren't even from Louisana so, again, who gives a fuck if there are fans that don't live in Minnesota that root for the Vikings.
You are supposed to have these stats, you already have a guy that is really from Minny,(not Chi town or fukn South Dakota who is still using netzero) saying that your schedule is softer than ours.
You didn't answer the questions. I am curious as to what your answers will be (well not curious, I just want a good laugh to be honest).
Who gives a fuck about schedules anyways! You aren't even from Louisana so, again, who gives a fuck if there are fans that don't live in Minnesota that root for the Vikings.
i know they lost , they battled and lost , but no one stopped them last year , not pitt , not philly or caolina ....i haven't seen anything out of the viking or saint defense that shows me they can stop AZ's offense
for them to not even be considered in the mix to go back to the sb is a joke at this point - favre is a t/o machine in the playoffs and drew brees and never done it in a big spot , writing them off at this point is a mistake
AZ has a similar offense to GB and MIN was able to stop GB running game and build off of that to minimize the passing game. But lets be honest I haven't seen anything out of the AZ D that would indicate they can stop MIN's offense either. Who knows crazier things have happened. It could be a rematch of the 1998 Divisional game, hopefully MIN wins again. Also, Kurt Warner has been pretty banged up lately and you guys are going no where without him. BOL with AZ!
i know they lost , they battled and lost , but no one stopped them last year , not pitt , not philly or caolina ....i haven't seen anything out of the viking or saint defense that shows me they can stop AZ's offense
for them to not even be considered in the mix to go back to the sb is a joke at this point - favre is a t/o machine in the playoffs and drew brees and never done it in a big spot , writing them off at this point is a mistake
AZ has a similar offense to GB and MIN was able to stop GB running game and build off of that to minimize the passing game. But lets be honest I haven't seen anything out of the AZ D that would indicate they can stop MIN's offense either. Who knows crazier things have happened. It could be a rematch of the 1998 Divisional game, hopefully MIN wins again. Also, Kurt Warner has been pretty banged up lately and you guys are going no where without him. BOL with AZ!
You are supposed to have these stats, you already have a guy that is really from Minny,(not Chi town or fukn South Dakota who is still using netzero) saying that your schedule is softer than ours.
Ha ha ha... this one guy who gave him a glimer of a hope that he might be right has not agreed that he was posting off the cuff and both MIN and NO have had easy schedules. He no where says that NO had a MUCH HARDER SCHEDULE than he previously posted. The truth is the combined record for MIN competition to date is 36-64 and NO's is 37-63. However, the real question that I have not gotten any answer to is if MIN has such a cupcake schedule how come NO has a much, much, much easier schedule down the stretch? MIN's schedule going forward plays opponents with a combined record of 32-28 whereas NO schedule shows opponents with a combined record of 27-33. Moreover, the only two teams that NO plays with winning records the rest of the way (NE and DAL) are at home. That cannot be said about MIN. But of course he ignores this and refuses to address this issue.
You are supposed to have these stats, you already have a guy that is really from Minny,(not Chi town or fukn South Dakota who is still using netzero) saying that your schedule is softer than ours.
Ha ha ha... this one guy who gave him a glimer of a hope that he might be right has not agreed that he was posting off the cuff and both MIN and NO have had easy schedules. He no where says that NO had a MUCH HARDER SCHEDULE than he previously posted. The truth is the combined record for MIN competition to date is 36-64 and NO's is 37-63. However, the real question that I have not gotten any answer to is if MIN has such a cupcake schedule how come NO has a much, much, much easier schedule down the stretch? MIN's schedule going forward plays opponents with a combined record of 32-28 whereas NO schedule shows opponents with a combined record of 27-33. Moreover, the only two teams that NO plays with winning records the rest of the way (NE and DAL) are at home. That cannot be said about MIN. But of course he ignores this and refuses to address this issue.
AZ has a similar offense to GB and MIN was able to stop GB running game and build off of that to minimize the passing game. But lets be honest I haven't seen anything out of the AZ D that would indicate they can stop MIN's offense either. Who knows crazier things have happened. It could be a rematch of the 1998 Divisional game, hopefully MIN wins again. Also, Kurt Warner has been pretty banged up lately and you guys are going no where without him. BOL with AZ!
i agree warner needs to be 100% for them to win , but , Larry Fitz /Boldin is no match for Jennings / Driver .....it's not even close
AZ has a similar offense to GB and MIN was able to stop GB running game and build off of that to minimize the passing game. But lets be honest I haven't seen anything out of the AZ D that would indicate they can stop MIN's offense either. Who knows crazier things have happened. It could be a rematch of the 1998 Divisional game, hopefully MIN wins again. Also, Kurt Warner has been pretty banged up lately and you guys are going no where without him. BOL with AZ!
i agree warner needs to be 100% for them to win , but , Larry Fitz /Boldin is no match for Jennings / Driver .....it's not even close
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.