All Forums | NFL Betting

How to Create Steady Monthly Income from Betting on Sports

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 112739
Posts: 501
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 1113
Posted: #126
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 20322
Posted: #127

Listen your the one who is on some power trip and we should all bow down because your here to teach all of us.

First off Goose is right, you havent posted one thing any gamber shouldnt already know, if they have been gambling for any amount of time

Secondly unless you are getting bet amounts directly from real sportsbook managers, then all the dollar amounts you are quoting, mean jack shittttttttttttt.  Any real veteran gambler knows that all those consensus sites are nothing but garbage scams.

Your a fool to think that any sportsbook would let their dollar amonts on games be posted on the net.  Why, so bettors can have more info to use to take their money,lmfaooooooooooo.

 

Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:

Yeah yeah. Anyway, thanks for dropping by.
If you had enough patience you'd understand that you're making a butt out of yourself by saying what you're saying.  First of all I said to treat info such as this with limited warranty. Second - the whole reason for the post supplying that info was to examine it after the game and not to wager by it as ATL -3.5 stayed as a lean only. Third -the site does supply precise sort of info I displayed but I would not mortgage my house that these numbers are accurate. Just examined it as a curious person and made a service to many here who are also familiar with that site/s , I'm sure and use that info. Fourth - what the info told us - happened.
And finally - what is the matter with you? Coming into utterly strangers' sites and acting like an overblown balloon about to burst - is that your cup of tea? Happy New Year and Merry Christmas!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 657
Posted: #128
I appreciate your info on this site. But "steady income from betting" and your unit weighing on different games DO NOT AGREE. If you are a real pro who live off betting, DO NOT DO THE (5-20) UNIT BOMB and 1 UNIT on games. Each game has the same probability of cashing or losing. Why weigh them differently? I am just saying the basics, if you lose one 20 U game, it takes you 21 games of 1 unit to break even. I think WISE people bet certain percentage of their bank roll, most 2-3%. If bankroll grows that 2-3% also grows. But what the heck do i know. Your choice, your thread. Thanks.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 423
Posted: #129
I've been taking the overs in football thinking it would be like previous years...been getting killed. Had a 4k 2 teamer on atl/denver that i lost because i took the over...so should of won that bet...4k to win 10k...down 15k on the year...i am behind on sports...way out of the loop...should not be betting
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2012
Posts: 4174
Posted: #130
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:


The amount info comes from https://www.sbrforum.com/betting-odds/consensus/ I think. And the man did say that he only examines it to see how trustworthy (to which level) it can be. Reread his post and you will see that too. Busting his chops for examining things while we sit around and wait is not gonna get any of us anywhere. And if you're such knowledgable veteran and goose too - what business you have coming into the man's thread and checking for his picks? May be you wanna give all your knowledgable picks?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 297
Posted: #131
I forgot to take your advice in rule whatever. Don't follow the blowhard. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #132
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:

I stayed away from that one, better plays on the board. 

I stayed away from SF game....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #133
Quote Originally Posted by Ciao:


Judging by your post, you have a tendency to take unders where the public is pounding the over.  I personally play more O/U in MLB.  I find Texas Rangers home unders (inflated totals) and CWS overs (Little league ballpark) in June and July to be profitable, are there any "day of the week trends" that you notice along this line?  Like perhaps unders on a sunday matinee game?  I found it interesting that you could peg such trends, and I wonder what you are basing this on, cuz it sounds mostly like a fade of the public,  Oh and thx for this post, it is great info!
When I'm handicapping totals on any sports - I take into account the number set for totals - is it out of the ordinary? (like if the teams have played just a week ago at the same place and went Over  - I expect the totals set for the next game between the teams to be higher - and if it is not, it says something), I take into account what is the teams O/U record realizing the numbers even out at sometime, the player's form and if there was a strong defensive play effort game before against the weak offensive play or the other way, day of the week factor and of course public perception of the game with money thrown at it. It's a whole excel page of numbers and trends. I'm trying to enter all the possible variables, let them work for sometime and then to decide if there is some characteristic behavior or its behavior is random 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #134
Quote Originally Posted by awright22:


 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 9021
Posted: #135
Don't let Goose and CD #'s get to you. They've been tarred and feathered in the political section so they've migrated to football to display their ignorance to a broader base.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #136
cd329

It's becoming tiring answering you and explaining to you. I will try to do it short: read all the posts, improve your English (power trip? - it's called Ego Trip), don't bow down and mostly remember - I didn't break down your door trying to force you to read my thread.
The site I'm getting info is not a consensus site and although I asked everyone to take that info with a limited liability (obviously, you and your twin Goose are conveniently missing that), the trend from those numbers was right and the leans (not bets yet as I was only examining that site's info) won.
And stop giving yourself and Goose medals for being "experienced gamblers", because if you were you would know that the site I brought the info from is not a consensus site

Merry Christmas (no need to bow down)
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #137
Quote Originally Posted by ThinkTwice:

I appreciate your info on this site. But "steady income from betting" and your unit weighing on different games DO NOT AGREE. If you are a real pro who live off betting, DO NOT DO THE (5-20) UNIT BOMB and 1 UNIT on games. Each game has the same probability of cashing or losing. Why weigh them differently? I am just saying the basics, if you lose one 20 U game, it takes you 21 games of 1 unit to break even. I think WISE people bet certain percentage of their bank roll, most 2-3%. If bankroll grows that 2-3% also grows. But what the heck do i know. Your choice, your thread. Thanks.
 DO NOT DO THE (5-20) UNIT BOMB 
I played 2 units, 3 units and the single unit so far. What are you basing your sentence on and what is 5-20? Who plays 20 units games? You must be confusing me with someone. When I said I could afford losing 20 games in a row with 2000$ bankroll - I did not say I'm playing 20 units games... Please guys - at least read what I write before reacting. Thanks anyways as I feel your intention was kind one.
Merry Christmas
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13
Posted: #138
That's cool that you remain humble and polite even with all these guys talking shit to you. Why would you guys hate on him? He's not asking anyone for anything, and he's posting intelligent opinions, well worded, and giving his picks for free. Anyways, Merry Christmas everyone.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #139
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:


The amount info comes from https://www.sbrforum.com/betting-odds/consensus/ I think. And the man did say that he only examines it to see how trustworthy (to which level) it can be. Reread his post and you will see that too. Busting his chops for examining things while we sit around and wait is not gonna get any of us anywhere. And if you're such knowledgable veteran and goose too - what business you have coming into the man's thread and checking for his picks? May be you wanna give all your knowledgable picks?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 13
Posted: #140
I typed $hit, it replaced with garbage. lol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #141
Quote Originally Posted by brydensuits:

I forgot to take your advice in rule whatever. Don't follow the blowhard. 
You can ease the straps on your hands and the legs and take the ball out of your mouth now.....
Merry Christmas!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #142
Quote Originally Posted by esplanade:

Don't let Goose and CD #'s get to you. They've been tarred and feathered in the political section so they've migrated to football to display their ignorance to a broader base.
That's a funny way to describe the reason for their migration
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #143
Quote Originally Posted by BEASTIN619:

That's cool that you remain humble and polite even with all these guys talking garbage to you. Why would you guys hate on him? He's not asking anyone for anything, and he's posting intelligent opinions, well worded, and giving his picks for free. Anyways, Merry Christmas everyone.

Why should I be worried? They're the ones supposed to be worried. And they most probably are. Otherwise such display of uncalled animosity is hard to explain.
 Merry Christmas!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 16326
Posted: #144
THATS  TOO FUNNY  16-7 PAY TOUTS AND WHERE THE MONIES @ ON A GAME   DONT TELL US AFTER ALL YOU HAVE BEEN TROUGH YOUR STILL PAYING OUR AS YOU SAY ( BOUGHT FROM SAME SOURCE)_
 
STEADY SKIPPY
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #145
poolman11? I tried hard do decipher your message buddy. Really... If you just could simplify - it would help to understand what you're saying. Right now it sounds like someone has a choke on you and all you manage to get out are unconnected words and meaningless sentences...
Merry Christmas!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2003
Posts: 32143
Posted: #146
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:

That's a funny way to describe the reason for their migration



Yeah, esplanade is a very funny guy. 

~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #147
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:


I stayed away from SF game....

After going 7-2 ats this week in nfl i was riding it and had SF ML and the over 40.  Had ml +115 (bet 50) and over (bet 55 to win 50).  Hit the over but lost side bet, didnt make or lose anything.  I agree with almost all the info you put out.  I am a recreational gambler, but I do a lot of studying and have read books by several professionals who do it for a living and most say you need to bet at least 3-5 games a day to grind out a living.  They also say you need to be hitting over 54 % in the long run to do it.  Also say that anybody that claims to be hitting over 60% over the long term is full of BS!  Keep up the good work!  This info a lot of people should take heed to.  Just think a pro would need to play more than 1-2 games a day, depending on whats available. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #148
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:




Yeah, esplanade is a very funny guy. 


This is Christmas - so in that spirit - check out Jimmy Page playing with the Black Crows "In time of my Dying" live on youtube - if you didn't see it - you'd love it
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5295
Posted: #149
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:

After going 7-2 ats this week in nfl i was riding it and had SF ML and the over 40.  Had ml +115 (bet 50) and over (bet 55 to win 50).  Hit the over but lost side bet, didnt make or lose anything.  I agree with almost all the info you put out.  I am a recreational gambler, but I do a lot of studying and have read books by several professionals who do it for a living and most say you need to bet at least 3-5 games a day to grind out a living.  They also say you need to be hitting over 54 % in the long run to do it.  Also say that anybody that claims to be hitting over 60% over the long term is full of BS!  Keep up the good work!  This info a lot of people should take heed to.  Just think a pro would need to play more than 1-2 games a day, depending on whats available. 

Ha Ha, I commented it in a funny way as the counter comment on your staying away from the Giants game. I know you took over too - I saw it on your thread and I think congratulated you on a good day. If I didn't  - here it is - Grats! I know what you're saying about playing 3-5 games but forcing the plays is even worse as you already know for sure. So, although there were lots of games last night - and I usually love playing single games on prime time - I chose to stay away from SF game  for a reason as I was not convinced what kind of the Niners we will get. At all, I hate betting Seattle games as something is very fishy with each of their game. As about the other games - I had leans but stayed away not being sure. I believe in a strategy of "not losing is like winning" in certain circumstances. I played NBA game thou and won with Minnesota covering in MSG. So overall I did have 3 plays yesterday.
Thanks for your positive input BigUnit and GL 
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 19509
Posted: #150
Quote Originally Posted by SportsMavin:

Ha Ha, I commented it in a funny way as the counter comment on your staying away from the Giants game. I know you took over too - I saw it on your thread and I think congratulated you on a good day. If I didn't  - here it is - Grats! I know what you're saying about playing 3-5 games but forcing the plays is even worse as you already know for sure. So, although there were lots of games last night - and I usually love playing single games on prime time - I chose to stay away from SF game  for a reason as I was not convinced what kind of the Niners we will get. At all, I hate betting Seattle games as something is very fishy with each of their game. As about the other games - I had leans but stayed away not being sure. I believe in a strategy of "not losing is like winning" in certain circumstances. I played NBA game thou and won with Minnesota covering in MSG. So overall I did have 3 plays yesterday.
Thanks for your positive input BigUnit and GL 

Forgot that there is more than one sport going on! 

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.