Agree, I reacted to the line as well. The books really wanted the Browns money.
A big jump like that so early in the game is not normal. If you think about it this way, in MLB if a favorite takes the lead in the first inning then the odds for the favorite will not drop that much like it would if it was in the last inning. So the -13,5 was a little too much so early in the game. I think it should have been -11.5 which should have been more "normal" and logical.
As a rule, if the line will jump like yesterday, then always go with the team like 49ers yesterday. Why? Because the books have too much risk on 49ers so they will beg the public to pound the Browns so their risk on 49ers will be less. This means that there is serious money on 49ers.
I have worked as a bookie for a company which is owned by one of the leading European sites so Im not talking shit. We did work with live betting mainly and it all is about risk. The bookies follow the market, if you're not following the market and go under the market then everybody will buy from you and you will end up with a BIG risk which you dont want. If you have a lot of risk then you want people to buy from the other side to even up and minimize the risk. So as I wrote earlier, if its an abnormal change then keep in mind that the other side have big money and you want to follow the big money.
Pre-game odds is set by the big bookies and the rest will follow the odds so they dont get fucked. You dont see one bookie offering -7 and another -3 on the same game, then obviously everybody will buy from -3 and buy +7 from the other site. Then the site with the line at 3 will increase the line to get more action on the dog. The market will then adjust at for instance 6.5 since the +7 site have a lot of dog lovers and need the money on the favorite as well. Hope this makes sense. Im sorry English is not my first language.
Thats my thoughts about last game and I hade 49ers -4,5 and U47,5
Agree, I reacted to the line as well. The books really wanted the Browns money.
A big jump like that so early in the game is not normal. If you think about it this way, in MLB if a favorite takes the lead in the first inning then the odds for the favorite will not drop that much like it would if it was in the last inning. So the -13,5 was a little too much so early in the game. I think it should have been -11.5 which should have been more "normal" and logical.
As a rule, if the line will jump like yesterday, then always go with the team like 49ers yesterday. Why? Because the books have too much risk on 49ers so they will beg the public to pound the Browns so their risk on 49ers will be less. This means that there is serious money on 49ers.
I have worked as a bookie for a company which is owned by one of the leading European sites so Im not talking shit. We did work with live betting mainly and it all is about risk. The bookies follow the market, if you're not following the market and go under the market then everybody will buy from you and you will end up with a BIG risk which you dont want. If you have a lot of risk then you want people to buy from the other side to even up and minimize the risk. So as I wrote earlier, if its an abnormal change then keep in mind that the other side have big money and you want to follow the big money.
Pre-game odds is set by the big bookies and the rest will follow the odds so they dont get fucked. You dont see one bookie offering -7 and another -3 on the same game, then obviously everybody will buy from -3 and buy +7 from the other site. Then the site with the line at 3 will increase the line to get more action on the dog. The market will then adjust at for instance 6.5 since the +7 site have a lot of dog lovers and need the money on the favorite as well. Hope this makes sense. Im sorry English is not my first language.
Thats my thoughts about last game and I hade 49ers -4,5 and U47,5
exactly this league is a reality show
good one
exactly this league is a reality show
good one
Worked for big local years ago it is impossible to fix any nfl game these are millionaires playing refs are not known until game day if any ref is spotted taking cash before or after any game whoaaa be him sorry for bad typos I’m on mobile
Worked for big local years ago it is impossible to fix any nfl game these are millionaires playing refs are not known until game day if any ref is spotted taking cash before or after any game whoaaa be him sorry for bad typos I’m on mobile
Its not fixed like a huge secret group or something. Maybe some players or refs have been paid but that would be a few people and not a secret fix group of bookies. Its easier to fix games for smaller games like lower divisions and non-pros.
However, if the bookies see that there is too much action on a game that usually would wager for 10k total and now its 300k, then the match fixing flag would be going off and they would probably close that game for any live bets and maybe even void the game if they suspect its been a fix. So its easier to go under radar with match fixing for bigger games but it would cost you much more to buy the players that already making tons of money. But I doubt there is some big secret group involving players, coaches and refs from all teams. It would leak about that pretty fast and somebody would talk.
Its not fixed like a huge secret group or something. Maybe some players or refs have been paid but that would be a few people and not a secret fix group of bookies. Its easier to fix games for smaller games like lower divisions and non-pros.
However, if the bookies see that there is too much action on a game that usually would wager for 10k total and now its 300k, then the match fixing flag would be going off and they would probably close that game for any live bets and maybe even void the game if they suspect its been a fix. So its easier to go under radar with match fixing for bigger games but it would cost you much more to buy the players that already making tons of money. But I doubt there is some big secret group involving players, coaches and refs from all teams. It would leak about that pretty fast and somebody would talk.
All I know is,the Browns @ Mayfeild in particular looked like garbage--that slob coach with his unshaven mug and bloated belly pacing around like a fucking nitwit, to Mayfeilds bush league antics and putrid performance convince me they just flat out suck.
All I know is,the Browns @ Mayfeild in particular looked like garbage--that slob coach with his unshaven mug and bloated belly pacing around like a fucking nitwit, to Mayfeilds bush league antics and putrid performance convince me they just flat out suck.
Yet, odds makers anticipate them winning this Sunday by a margin of a fg with the visiting Seahawks..
Just an utter mind f*ck..
Yet, odds makers anticipate them winning this Sunday by a margin of a fg with the visiting Seahawks..
Just an utter mind f*ck..
Start @ 11:35, Marshall ran it to the 1
Then they create the interception! WTF - Seattle still has a time out and you don't give the ball the Marshall Lynch????
Start @ 11:35, Marshall ran it to the 1
Then they create the interception! WTF - Seattle still has a time out and you don't give the ball the Marshall Lynch????
Could you do me a favor and post your plays.
Could you do me a favor and post your plays.
Why bother, it's all rigged! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Why bother, it's all rigged! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
It's an entertainment business. Not a competition. Refs and players are paid so much because they do exactly as told by a billion dollar business. Do some better research. It's' not illegal for the league to create any outcome it wants.
Impossible? Are you seriously that gullible?
Nothings makes billions by letting things play out naturally.
It's an entertainment business. Not a competition. Refs and players are paid so much because they do exactly as told by a billion dollar business. Do some better research. It's' not illegal for the league to create any outcome it wants.
Impossible? Are you seriously that gullible?
Nothings makes billions by letting things play out naturally.
Lol whether a child turns around to look at a toy, doesn't have crap to do with a billion dollar entertainment business. Players and refs are paid to do exactly as told. If the league tells the refs to sway the game one way or the other, nothing illegal is happening. Its' not against the law for them to get any outcome they want.
Billions of dollars means/equals = nothing is impossible.
Lol whether a child turns around to look at a toy, doesn't have crap to do with a billion dollar entertainment business. Players and refs are paid to do exactly as told. If the league tells the refs to sway the game one way or the other, nothing illegal is happening. Its' not against the law for them to get any outcome they want.
Billions of dollars means/equals = nothing is impossible.
It's an entertainment business. Not a competition. Refs and players are paid so much because they do exactly as told by a billion dollar business. Do some better research. It's' not illegal for the league to create any outcome it wants.
Impossible? Are you seriously that gullible?
Nothings makes billions by letting things play out naturally.
It's an entertainment business. Not a competition. Refs and players are paid so much because they do exactly as told by a billion dollar business. Do some better research. It's' not illegal for the league to create any outcome it wants.
Impossible? Are you seriously that gullible?
Nothings makes billions by letting things play out naturally.
If there is so called sharp money on games, why wouldn't that information be public, and therefor information someone could follow? Can someone tell me how to track the "smart money?" I'm not trying to be a smart ass, may sound like a dumb ass, but how did the sharps know Cleveland was that bad? Or Baker that bad?
If there is so called sharp money on games, why wouldn't that information be public, and therefor information someone could follow? Can someone tell me how to track the "smart money?" I'm not trying to be a smart ass, may sound like a dumb ass, but how did the sharps know Cleveland was that bad? Or Baker that bad?
No matter what happens you will say it was rigged. If Cleveland rallies and covers the spread, you would say it was rigged. If the 2nd half goes fast instead of slow you would say it was rigged. If it rains you would say it was rigged.
If it was indeed rigged, then you`d be able to foresee everything pre-game and you`d be a millionaire. That is the precise proof that this shit ain`t rigged.
Glad you cashed your $3 bet on the 9ers
No matter what happens you will say it was rigged. If Cleveland rallies and covers the spread, you would say it was rigged. If the 2nd half goes fast instead of slow you would say it was rigged. If it rains you would say it was rigged.
If it was indeed rigged, then you`d be able to foresee everything pre-game and you`d be a millionaire. That is the precise proof that this shit ain`t rigged.
Glad you cashed your $3 bet on the 9ers
BTW what has happened is that we all have underestimated the 9ers. Those shitty niners. I am the guiltiest person out there of doing this. Why? Because we generally handicap on the main names... Wilson, Gurley, Julio, Hopkins, Ertz, but we forget to analyze the fat SOBs whose names most people don`t even know.
Truth be told, in retrospect, this game was simple to foresee, 9ers D line vs that morbid O line from Cleveland. Yet the OBJ-Landry hype still clinged for most bettors who forget that this game is and will always be determined in the trenches.
BTW what has happened is that we all have underestimated the 9ers. Those shitty niners. I am the guiltiest person out there of doing this. Why? Because we generally handicap on the main names... Wilson, Gurley, Julio, Hopkins, Ertz, but we forget to analyze the fat SOBs whose names most people don`t even know.
Truth be told, in retrospect, this game was simple to foresee, 9ers D line vs that morbid O line from Cleveland. Yet the OBJ-Landry hype still clinged for most bettors who forget that this game is and will always be determined in the trenches.
sharp money on games, why wouldn't that information be public, and therefor information someone could follow? Can someone tell me how to track the "smart money?" I'm not trying to be a smart ass, may sound like a dumb ass, but how did the sharps know Cleveland was that bad? Or Baker that bad?No matter what happens you will say it was rigged. If Cleveland rallies and covers the spread, you would say it was rigged. If the 2nd half goes fast instead of slow you would say it was rigged. If it rains you would say it was rigged. If it was indeed rigged, then you`d be able to foresee everything pre-game and you`d be a millionaire. That is the precise proof that this shit ain`t rigged. Glad you cashed your $3 bet on the 9ers[/Quote]s d
Lol its entertainment like a movie. You don' know how every movie ends. You can know something is fake without knowing the ending. You aren' thinking this through all. You simply choose to believe everything your tv tells you.
sharp money on games, why wouldn't that information be public, and therefor information someone could follow? Can someone tell me how to track the "smart money?" I'm not trying to be a smart ass, may sound like a dumb ass, but how did the sharps know Cleveland was that bad? Or Baker that bad?No matter what happens you will say it was rigged. If Cleveland rallies and covers the spread, you would say it was rigged. If the 2nd half goes fast instead of slow you would say it was rigged. If it rains you would say it was rigged. If it was indeed rigged, then you`d be able to foresee everything pre-game and you`d be a millionaire. That is the precise proof that this shit ain`t rigged. Glad you cashed your $3 bet on the 9ers[/Quote]s d
Lol its entertainment like a movie. You don' know how every movie ends. You can know something is fake without knowing the ending. You aren' thinking this through all. You simply choose to believe everything your tv tells you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.