Minnesota Vikings @ Los Angeles Rams Surprised this line is only -7. If Vikings are competitive in this game then kudos to Zimmer, but I’m expecting them to get blown out. Minnesota is living off their 2017 reputation, but this isn’t the same team. Rams -7 (2.5x) NFL YTD: 26-5 ATS +49.77 units Also locking in Cowboys -3 for 3x now as I expect that to go to -3.5 soon. Rest of card coming tomorrow.
hard to bet against you man. Hmm... maybe I should do a rams teaser just incase
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
Minnesota Vikings @ Los Angeles Rams Surprised this line is only -7. If Vikings are competitive in this game then kudos to Zimmer, but I’m expecting them to get blown out. Minnesota is living off their 2017 reputation, but this isn’t the same team. Rams -7 (2.5x) NFL YTD: 26-5 ATS +49.77 units Also locking in Cowboys -3 for 3x now as I expect that to go to -3.5 soon. Rest of card coming tomorrow.
hard to bet against you man. Hmm... maybe I should do a rams teaser just incase
Do you think the loss of peters and Talib explains a line of -6.5. Minny looked awful and rams looked great. Should we expect some regression to the mean. I don’t think I can back minny but 6.5 is a lot of points. LC I’d love to hear your thoughts on the injuries in the secondary for the rams.
dont forget griffin is out for Vikings. Main pass rusher.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bmarlin:
Do you think the loss of peters and Talib explains a line of -6.5. Minny looked awful and rams looked great. Should we expect some regression to the mean. I don’t think I can back minny but 6.5 is a lot of points. LC I’d love to hear your thoughts on the injuries in the secondary for the rams.
dont forget griffin is out for Vikings. Main pass rusher.
I wish I had the stats, but I wager that short weeks are less favorable for 1) material 7pt+ underdogs, 2) road reams, 3) teams that have a lot to figure out (although this one is nearly impossible to check)... Feels like a tough spot for Minny. I have Rams teased and joined for -7... BOL to us
0
I wish I had the stats, but I wager that short weeks are less favorable for 1) material 7pt+ underdogs, 2) road reams, 3) teams that have a lot to figure out (although this one is nearly impossible to check)... Feels like a tough spot for Minny. I have Rams teased and joined for -7... BOL to us
I wish I had the stats, but I wager that short weeks are less favorable for 1) material 7pt+ underdogs, 2) road reams, 3) teams that have a lot to figure out (although this one is nearly impossible to check)... Feels like a tough spot for Minny. I have Rams teased and joined for -7... BOL to us
0
Quote Originally Posted by Titusblink:
I wish I had the stats, but I wager that short weeks are less favorable for 1) material 7pt+ underdogs, 2) road reams, 3) teams that have a lot to figure out (although this one is nearly impossible to check)... Feels like a tough spot for Minny. I have Rams teased and joined for -7... BOL to us
you were a little off in the TB Pitt game and I think youre a little off here. these two teams are very close in skill players and defense, minny has the better qb. cook will keep the rams honest and cousins can make the throws.the rams want to prove themselves and beat a good team and the vikes and cousins want to prove last week was a fluke.ill take the 7
Losing by 3 after that first half by Fitzpatrick....Didn't cash but wasn't necessarily wrong capping. 4-1 to the bad in turnovers makes it kinda hard.
And you really think Cousins is better than Goff?? Really??
0
Quote Originally Posted by kbach54:
you were a little off in the TB Pitt game and I think youre a little off here. these two teams are very close in skill players and defense, minny has the better qb. cook will keep the rams honest and cousins can make the throws.the rams want to prove themselves and beat a good team and the vikes and cousins want to prove last week was a fluke.ill take the 7
Losing by 3 after that first half by Fitzpatrick....Didn't cash but wasn't necessarily wrong capping. 4-1 to the bad in turnovers makes it kinda hard.
And you really think Cousins is better than Goff?? Really??
you were a little off in the TB Pitt game and I think youre a little off here. these two teams are very close in skill players and defense, minny has the better qb. cook will keep the rams honest and cousins can make the throws.the rams want to prove themselves and beat a good team and the vikes and cousins want to prove last week was a fluke.ill take the 7
hey LC, you were off on a game, you heard it here, calling you out
0
Quote Originally Posted by kbach54:
you were a little off in the TB Pitt game and I think youre a little off here. these two teams are very close in skill players and defense, minny has the better qb. cook will keep the rams honest and cousins can make the throws.the rams want to prove themselves and beat a good team and the vikes and cousins want to prove last week was a fluke.ill take the 7
hey LC, you were off on a game, you heard it here, calling you out
you were a little off in the TB Pitt game and I think youre a little off here. these two teams are very close in skill players and defense, minny has the better qb. cook will keep the rams honest and cousins can make the throws.the rams want to prove themselves and beat a good team and the vikes and cousins want to prove last week was a fluke.ill take the 7
good stuff man, maybe start your own thread with this hard hitting analysis and you will be on your way to covers greatness
Ehh BigD, you are a little of in your last post and you're a little off here. We have to remain focused on the inexcusable reality that LC isnt going a perfect 90-0 for the season
0
Quote Originally Posted by BIGDTITLE:
Quote Originally Posted by kbach54:
you were a little off in the TB Pitt game and I think youre a little off here. these two teams are very close in skill players and defense, minny has the better qb. cook will keep the rams honest and cousins can make the throws.the rams want to prove themselves and beat a good team and the vikes and cousins want to prove last week was a fluke.ill take the 7
good stuff man, maybe start your own thread with this hard hitting analysis and you will be on your way to covers greatness
Ehh BigD, you are a little of in your last post and you're a little off here. We have to remain focused on the inexcusable reality that LC isnt going a perfect 90-0 for the season
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you who said anything about confuse? Yes I post plays
Ask your shitzu for picks..you're trying way way way to hard KNEE-GROW!!!
Take a grammar class... Your shitzu is way smarter....
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ikid2groove035:
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you who said anything about confuse? Yes I post plays
Ask your shitzu for picks..you're trying way way way to hard KNEE-GROW!!!
Take a grammar class... Your shitzu is way smarter....
teeing off on cousins during vikes last drive (ps. ask me about the scandanavian viking fairer sex at some point... its not wrong) up 13 vs. 10, game would be rams win by 13 with 4th down suh sack... lets game plan for a sans zuerlein next time eh, sheesh;))) wish boys was 4x, I feel it LC
0
teeing off on cousins during vikes last drive (ps. ask me about the scandanavian viking fairer sex at some point... its not wrong) up 13 vs. 10, game would be rams win by 13 with 4th down suh sack... lets game plan for a sans zuerlein next time eh, sheesh;))) wish boys was 4x, I feel it LC
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.