Surprised this line is only -7. If Vikings are competitive in this game
then kudos to Zimmer, but I’m expecting them to get blown out. Minnesota is
living off their 2017 reputation, but this isn’t the same team.
Rams -7 (2.5x)
NFL
YTD: 26-5
ATS +49.77 units
Also locking in Cowboys -3 for 3x now as I expect that to go to -3.5 soon.
Rest of card coming tomorrow.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Minnesota
Vikings @ Los Angeles Rams
Surprised this line is only -7. If Vikings are competitive in this game
then kudos to Zimmer, but I’m expecting them to get blown out. Minnesota is
living off their 2017 reputation, but this isn’t the same team.
Rams -7 (2.5x)
NFL
YTD: 26-5
ATS +49.77 units
Also locking in Cowboys -3 for 3x now as I expect that to go to -3.5 soon.
Rest of card coming tomorrow.
Besides adding depth on defense and improving at QB, "this isn't the same team"???Would love to know why you think they have regressed. I just don't see it from a talent standpoint.Thanks LC. Keep rolling.
Minny rallies around Keenum as their leader...the entire team had his back..and it appears they havent taken to Cousins nearly as well...contract envy perhaps, or else Cousins duped everyone as just another average "Matthew Stafford" type qb
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
0
Quote Originally Posted by Liturgy_of_Fade:
Besides adding depth on defense and improving at QB, "this isn't the same team"???Would love to know why you think they have regressed. I just don't see it from a talent standpoint.Thanks LC. Keep rolling.
Minny rallies around Keenum as their leader...the entire team had his back..and it appears they havent taken to Cousins nearly as well...contract envy perhaps, or else Cousins duped everyone as just another average "Matthew Stafford" type qb
Besides adding depth on defense and improving at QB, "this isn't the same team"???
Would love to know why you think they have regressed. I just don't see it from a talent standpoint.
Thanks LC. Keep rolling.
Not only do they have a new QB, but they also have a new OC this year. Brand new system basically on offense which takes time to learn. Now, their leader on defense is out plus they have apparent distractions.
Lot of talk that Rams haven't beat a good team yet, so here's their chance to prove they are for real on Primetime.
Again if Vikings can stay competitive in this type of spot on a short-week, all credit goes to Zimmer. I just think the Rams are better situated to take care of business
0
Quote Originally Posted by Liturgy_of_Fade:
Besides adding depth on defense and improving at QB, "this isn't the same team"???
Would love to know why you think they have regressed. I just don't see it from a talent standpoint.
Thanks LC. Keep rolling.
Not only do they have a new QB, but they also have a new OC this year. Brand new system basically on offense which takes time to learn. Now, their leader on defense is out plus they have apparent distractions.
Lot of talk that Rams haven't beat a good team yet, so here's their chance to prove they are for real on Primetime.
Again if Vikings can stay competitive in this type of spot on a short-week, all credit goes to Zimmer. I just think the Rams are better situated to take care of business
Do you think the loss of peters and Talib explains a line of -6.5. Minny looked awful and rams looked great. Should we expect some regression to the mean. I don’t think I can back minny but 6.5 is a lot of points. LC I’d love to hear your thoughts on the injuries in the secondary for the rams.
0
Do you think the loss of peters and Talib explains a line of -6.5. Minny looked awful and rams looked great. Should we expect some regression to the mean. I don’t think I can back minny but 6.5 is a lot of points. LC I’d love to hear your thoughts on the injuries in the secondary for the rams.
Hey LC, first of all respect on the great start. I was leaning Minny, but now I will change my pick. Don't ever want to go against you sir, especially now that you are on fire. I need a little help in my pickem pool this week. Do you think MIA or NYJ or both can pull off upsets this week? Need to turn in all picks today.
Thanks!
0
Hey LC, first of all respect on the great start. I was leaning Minny, but now I will change my pick. Don't ever want to go against you sir, especially now that you are on fire. I need a little help in my pickem pool this week. Do you think MIA or NYJ or both can pull off upsets this week? Need to turn in all picks today.
Feels like LC likes the rams - but wouldn’t be shock if Vikings win
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?
I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ikid2groove035:
Feels like LC likes the rams - but wouldn’t be shock if Vikings win
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?
I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you
Feels like LC likes the rams - but wouldn’t be shock if Vikings win
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you
who said anything about confuse? Yes I post plays
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Quote Originally Posted by Ikid2groove035:
Feels like LC likes the rams - but wouldn’t be shock if Vikings win
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
0
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?
I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you
That is a factual statement !
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
It "feels" like LC likes the rams? What part of 2.5x on -7 is confusing?
I know it's rare, but some posters actually post plays here at covers. And...some actually post an accurate record w/ +- units etc...we are almost extinct I tell you
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
i hope 6.5 shows up again.i wouldn't be surprised if final score landed exactly on 7. i can see a 6 pt margin just as much as a 10 pt margin. i feel like Rams should win this by 10 so if 7.5 does show up at even i would definitely take a shot at it.
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
i hope 6.5 shows up again.i wouldn't be surprised if final score landed exactly on 7. i can see a 6 pt margin just as much as a 10 pt margin. i feel like Rams should win this by 10 so if 7.5 does show up at even i would definitely take a shot at it.
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
Stop betting while you can
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
Do you think the loss of peters and Talib explains a line of -6.5. Minny looked awful and rams looked great. Should we expect some regression to the mean. I don’t think I can back minny but 6.5 is a lot of points. LC I’d love to hear your thoughts on the injuries in the secondary for the rams.
I do think the loss of both their CBs will play an impact because they are both pro bowl talent, but I still think this matchup is pretty lopsided. The Rams are a near complete team, while the Vikings right now are not
0
Quote Originally Posted by Bmarlin:
Do you think the loss of peters and Talib explains a line of -6.5. Minny looked awful and rams looked great. Should we expect some regression to the mean. I don’t think I can back minny but 6.5 is a lot of points. LC I’d love to hear your thoughts on the injuries in the secondary for the rams.
I do think the loss of both their CBs will play an impact because they are both pro bowl talent, but I still think this matchup is pretty lopsided. The Rams are a near complete team, while the Vikings right now are not
Hey LC, first of all respect on the great start. I was leaning Minny, but now I will change my pick. Don't ever want to go against you sir, especially now that you are on fire. I need a little help in my pickem pool this week. Do you think MIA or NYJ or both can pull off upsets this week? Need to turn in all picks today.
Thanks!
Miami definitely not. No thoughts on the other 1
0
Quote Originally Posted by bookiekilla:
Hey LC, first of all respect on the great start. I was leaning Minny, but now I will change my pick. Don't ever want to go against you sir, especially now that you are on fire. I need a little help in my pickem pool this week. Do you think MIA or NYJ or both can pull off upsets this week? Need to turn in all picks today.
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
7.5 (even) is a much better # than -7 -125 long-term. But you can get -7 for -105 pretty much anywhere right now
0
Quote Originally Posted by unplucked_gem:
Assuming you like the Rams here, would you rather lay 7 @ -125 or 7.5 @ even? Since I missed -6.5, I am staying away, but curious about these numbers. BOL
7.5 (even) is a much better # than -7 -125 long-term. But you can get -7 for -105 pretty much anywhere right now
Thank you sir for responding! I agree about MIA. It looks like too many peeps are picking MIA this week. This is when Brady and CO. destroy dreams! Nobody wants the J-E-T-S this week after crapping down their pants last week vs. CLE! I will bite. You have to take some dogs if you want to win the pool!
Good luck this week!
0
Thank you sir for responding! I agree about MIA. It looks like too many peeps are picking MIA this week. This is when Brady and CO. destroy dreams! Nobody wants the J-E-T-S this week after crapping down their pants last week vs. CLE! I will bite. You have to take some dogs if you want to win the pool!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.