Don't know how much your big bet'll be but I'm thinkin' you're gonna get some bang for your buck as far as entertainment value goes . Betting over anything with these 2 offences is risky --but doable . GL
0
Don't know how much your big bet'll be but I'm thinkin' you're gonna get some bang for your buck as far as entertainment value goes . Betting over anything with these 2 offences is risky --but doable . GL
Sometimes you just know your spots and you need to hit them hard.
2 other bets I won in recent history I forgot about.
Kobe's last game:
1) Kobe over 25.5 points.
2) LAL +4.
Houston played Sacramento earlier in the day and a Houston victory eliminated the Utah Jazz (Kobe's opponent). I knew Houston would win (they were 16 pt favorites) and bet huge on LAL +4 while it was still there.
As soon as Houston won the line swung across the 0 to become LAL -1.
This is a really good spot.
Houston has a stout defense and we already know the story with Denver's defense.
This will be a relatively routine game but there will be more than 10 points in the 4th quarter. Brock Osweiler is competing against the team that told him he was too expensive and Trevor Siemian is trying to prove why he is better than the guy he replaced.
The storyline is there for an exciting game and with NFL viewership down this year the NFL cannot afford to show another boring Primetime game.
Call me a fool all you want but sports are entertainment. They may not necessarily be rigged but they are certainly influenced by commercial interests.
0
Not worried about this game.
Sometimes you just know your spots and you need to hit them hard.
2 other bets I won in recent history I forgot about.
Kobe's last game:
1) Kobe over 25.5 points.
2) LAL +4.
Houston played Sacramento earlier in the day and a Houston victory eliminated the Utah Jazz (Kobe's opponent). I knew Houston would win (they were 16 pt favorites) and bet huge on LAL +4 while it was still there.
As soon as Houston won the line swung across the 0 to become LAL -1.
This is a really good spot.
Houston has a stout defense and we already know the story with Denver's defense.
This will be a relatively routine game but there will be more than 10 points in the 4th quarter. Brock Osweiler is competing against the team that told him he was too expensive and Trevor Siemian is trying to prove why he is better than the guy he replaced.
The storyline is there for an exciting game and with NFL viewership down this year the NFL cannot afford to show another boring Primetime game.
Call me a fool all you want but sports are entertainment. They may not necessarily be rigged but they are certainly influenced by commercial interests.
Don't know how much your big bet'll be but I'm thinkin' you're gonna get some bang for your buck as far as entertainment value goes . Betting over anything with these 2 offences is risky --but doable . GL
is 'doable' a scramble word?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Toros:
Don't know how much your big bet'll be but I'm thinkin' you're gonna get some bang for your buck as far as entertainment value goes . Betting over anything with these 2 offences is risky --but doable . GL
In the history of the modern era of the NFL (1980 onwards, 36 completed seasons), there has never been a season before now in which the MNF time-slot saw its initial 7 games of the new season come & go without featuring at least 1 game in which a losing team put up a team total between 17-31 pts. The 7 MNF losers so far this season have put up scores of 16, 0, 14, 32, 10, 14 & 3 pts.
To put this 17-31 pt loser scoring range in some sort of context: 42.8% of all losers from the other primetime games (TNF & SNF) this season have put up scores within this range & 49.0% of all losers from all non-MNF games played so far this season have put up scores within this range.
The picture painted from all of the above is rather clear: this is a highly unusual 'drought' to be taking place. The most obvious option this relates to for the coming game is the Texans TT: lined @14.5, this drought ending precludes the under option cashing. With the full game total lined 40.5 there's slightly more scope for the under to come in, but only at the very lowest end of the loser's score range (17-19 pts). The Texans have conceded plenty in their 2 losses (27 & 31 pts) while the Broncos have conceded at least 17 pts in 3 of their 4 wins (the only exception vs. a non-conference opponent).
Just food for thought, take it fwiw.
good read, appreciate the stats
0
Quote Originally Posted by BetCrimes1984:
In the history of the modern era of the NFL (1980 onwards, 36 completed seasons), there has never been a season before now in which the MNF time-slot saw its initial 7 games of the new season come & go without featuring at least 1 game in which a losing team put up a team total between 17-31 pts. The 7 MNF losers so far this season have put up scores of 16, 0, 14, 32, 10, 14 & 3 pts.
To put this 17-31 pt loser scoring range in some sort of context: 42.8% of all losers from the other primetime games (TNF & SNF) this season have put up scores within this range & 49.0% of all losers from all non-MNF games played so far this season have put up scores within this range.
The picture painted from all of the above is rather clear: this is a highly unusual 'drought' to be taking place. The most obvious option this relates to for the coming game is the Texans TT: lined @14.5, this drought ending precludes the under option cashing. With the full game total lined 40.5 there's slightly more scope for the under to come in, but only at the very lowest end of the loser's score range (17-19 pts). The Texans have conceded plenty in their 2 losses (27 & 31 pts) while the Broncos have conceded at least 17 pts in 3 of their 4 wins (the only exception vs. a non-conference opponent).
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
