really??
tamba over raiders
giants over pats
giants over pats again
seahawks over recrod breaking denver offense
denver over carolina
really??
tamba over raiders
giants over pats
giants over pats again
seahawks over recrod breaking denver offense
denver over carolina
Renegadesofunk What!? Where do you get your stats from The Farmers Almanac?
Since 2000 Super bowl winners and their defense rank
2000 Ravens (As you mentioned) #1
2002 Tampa #1
2003 Patriots #1
2004 Patriots #2
2008 Steelers #1
2010 Packers #2
2013 Seattle #1
Man are you in for a rough weekend Buddy Good luck with your Almanac stat book
Renegadesofunk What!? Where do you get your stats from The Farmers Almanac?
Since 2000 Super bowl winners and their defense rank
2000 Ravens (As you mentioned) #1
2002 Tampa #1
2003 Patriots #1
2004 Patriots #2
2008 Steelers #1
2010 Packers #2
2013 Seattle #1
Man are you in for a rough weekend Buddy Good luck with your Almanac stat book
Great write up LC as always I would however caution you on the Vikes pick CK does not score a lot of points. If you look at the highlights from the last game they played you'll see a Saints team that was able to move the ball well against the Vikings D ..Bradford played in that one and as usual he looked like a hero gun slinger but that's typical Bradford in his debut game. Now both teams have improved since week 1 and I feel this will be much closer than you think I will take DB with revenge.
Great write up LC as always I would however caution you on the Vikes pick CK does not score a lot of points. If you look at the highlights from the last game they played you'll see a Saints team that was able to move the ball well against the Vikings D ..Bradford played in that one and as usual he looked like a hero gun slinger but that's typical Bradford in his debut game. Now both teams have improved since week 1 and I feel this will be much closer than you think I will take DB with revenge.
By the way Panthers beat the Vikings all be it at home but they put up 31 points on that stellar D. There must be some weakness some where and I'm gonna bet it's the old saying "rest equals rust " !
By the way Panthers beat the Vikings all be it at home but they put up 31 points on that stellar D. There must be some weakness some where and I'm gonna bet it's the old saying "rest equals rust " !
On any given day anyones defence can be exploited and exsposed but majority of games rule here and that 7-1 record at home against some fine teams is why the Vikings are where they are at Now....Their Defense Rocks!
On any given day anyones defence can be exploited and exsposed but majority of games rule here and that 7-1 record at home against some fine teams is why the Vikings are where they are at Now....Their Defense Rocks!
Well watch this any givin Sunday playoff w revenge! Saints 30 Vikings 21
Well watch this any givin Sunday playoff w revenge! Saints 30 Vikings 21
As far as N.O./Minn, I think it's foolhardy to base anything about the Saints off of the Carolina playoff game. Need we be reminded that was their 3rd meeting this year. And yet, the Saints owned that game until Carolina made a run late. The Panthers surely know a few things Minnesota will not. It is VERY difficult to beat a team 3 times in 1 year and the Saints did that.
Plus Cam Newton probably played the best game of his career accuracy wise and they still lost.
Also, while the Minnesota defense is solid, their stats got padded at the end of the season and with a soft, home friendly schedule. The Saints were the opposite with an absoluetly brutal road schedule.
Something has to be said for a battle tested team with a HOF QB. Think 2010 Packers. You'll see what that means tomorrow.
As far as N.O./Minn, I think it's foolhardy to base anything about the Saints off of the Carolina playoff game. Need we be reminded that was their 3rd meeting this year. And yet, the Saints owned that game until Carolina made a run late. The Panthers surely know a few things Minnesota will not. It is VERY difficult to beat a team 3 times in 1 year and the Saints did that.
Plus Cam Newton probably played the best game of his career accuracy wise and they still lost.
Also, while the Minnesota defense is solid, their stats got padded at the end of the season and with a soft, home friendly schedule. The Saints were the opposite with an absoluetly brutal road schedule.
Something has to be said for a battle tested team with a HOF QB. Think 2010 Packers. You'll see what that means tomorrow.
N.O. secondary has pro-bowler Marshon Lattimore and another top rookie in free safety Marcus Williams. They have 9 ints between them an the N.O. secondary has more ints than the Vikings. The other corner, Ken Crawley, is better than Trey Waynes for the Vikings. He didn't play in the team's first meeting.
The only bad part about the N.O. secondary is they are extremely young and are susceptible to communication break downs. Other than that, it is one of the best up and coming secondaries in the league. The Saints aren't top 5 in QB differential for nothing.
Wouldn't be shocked at all if Minnesota covers, but would be highly shocked if it's by double digits.
N.O. secondary has pro-bowler Marshon Lattimore and another top rookie in free safety Marcus Williams. They have 9 ints between them an the N.O. secondary has more ints than the Vikings. The other corner, Ken Crawley, is better than Trey Waynes for the Vikings. He didn't play in the team's first meeting.
The only bad part about the N.O. secondary is they are extremely young and are susceptible to communication break downs. Other than that, it is one of the best up and coming secondaries in the league. The Saints aren't top 5 in QB differential for nothing.
Wouldn't be shocked at all if Minnesota covers, but would be highly shocked if it's by double digits.
As far as N.O./Minn, I think it's foolhardy to base anything about the Saints off of the Carolina playoff game. Need we be reminded that was their 3rd meeting this year. And yet, the Saints owned that game until Carolina made a run late. The Panthers surely know a few things Minnesota will not. It is VERY difficult to beat a team 3 times in 1 year and the Saints did that.
Plus Cam Newton probably played the best game of his career accuracy wise and they still lost.
Also, while the Minnesota defense is solid, their stats got padded at the end of the season and with a soft, home friendly schedule. The Saints were the opposite with an absoluetly brutal road schedule.
Something has to be said for a battle tested team with a HOF QB. Think 2010 Packers. You'll see what that means tomorrow.
As far as N.O./Minn, I think it's foolhardy to base anything about the Saints off of the Carolina playoff game. Need we be reminded that was their 3rd meeting this year. And yet, the Saints owned that game until Carolina made a run late. The Panthers surely know a few things Minnesota will not. It is VERY difficult to beat a team 3 times in 1 year and the Saints did that.
Plus Cam Newton probably played the best game of his career accuracy wise and they still lost.
Also, while the Minnesota defense is solid, their stats got padded at the end of the season and with a soft, home friendly schedule. The Saints were the opposite with an absoluetly brutal road schedule.
Something has to be said for a battle tested team with a HOF QB. Think 2010 Packers. You'll see what that means tomorrow.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.