This line should be NE -13 if Brady was playing. That's a 10 point differential for starting Cassell ? The spread is now -3 Pats.
Hello ? Go figure that out. And the Pats coming off a bye week! No QB is worth 10 points.
If they win, and the Chargers lose in Maimi, then that sets up a low spread next week when the Pats play San Diego on the West Coast again. I will be all over the Chargers next week then.
San Diego will steam roll NE by 20+.
0
OMG ? You people are NUTS!
This line should be NE -13 if Brady was playing. That's a 10 point differential for starting Cassell ? The spread is now -3 Pats.
Hello ? Go figure that out. And the Pats coming off a bye week! No QB is worth 10 points.
If they win, and the Chargers lose in Maimi, then that sets up a low spread next week when the Pats play San Diego on the West Coast again. I will be all over the Chargers next week then.
<<<<<< There are better opportunities on the board than this game.
Really? Is this so? Why don't you post them? Better yet post them with reasons to support yourself. People like you just steal bandwidth from those of us with something to contribute, eiether state your opinion with supporting facts or start your own thread.
0
Quote Originally Posted by peppy222:
<<<<<< There are better opportunities on the board than this game.
Really? Is this so? Why don't you post them? Better yet post them with reasons to support yourself. People like you just steal bandwidth from those of us with something to contribute, eiether state your opinion with supporting facts or start your own thread.
great thread buddy, i like the pick and your confidence. all of belichick's successes have been with brady at qb. they were an 0-2 team when bledsoe got injured and brady forever changed that franchise. although that fucking tuck rule cost gruden a superbowl.
0
great thread buddy, i like the pick and your confidence. all of belichick's successes have been with brady at qb. they were an 0-2 team when bledsoe got injured and brady forever changed that franchise. although that fucking tuck rule cost gruden a superbowl.
This line should be NE -13 if Brady was playing. That's a 10 point differential for starting Cassell ? The spread is now -3 Pats.
Hello ? Go figure that out. And the Pats coming off a bye week! No QB is worth 10 points.
If they win, and the Chargers lose in Maimi, then that sets up a low spread next week when the Pats play San Diego on the West Coast again. I will be all over the Chargers next week then.
San Diego will steam roll NE by 20+.
First of all, UHQB, with all due respect, you're a horrible oddsmaker. It's as if, for you, time has stood still ever since the Patriots crushed the Buffalo Bils, 56-10, last year on Sunday Night Football. How else could someone come up with a crazy line like Patriots (with Brady) -13 at San Francisco?
Secondly, and with not as much respect, if you bet on the next two Patriots games (on them this week and against them next week), your best hope is splitting out, but most likely 0-2.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UHQB:
OMG ? You people are NUTS!
This line should be NE -13 if Brady was playing. That's a 10 point differential for starting Cassell ? The spread is now -3 Pats.
Hello ? Go figure that out. And the Pats coming off a bye week! No QB is worth 10 points.
If they win, and the Chargers lose in Maimi, then that sets up a low spread next week when the Pats play San Diego on the West Coast again. I will be all over the Chargers next week then.
San Diego will steam roll NE by 20+.
First of all, UHQB, with all due respect, you're a horrible oddsmaker. It's as if, for you, time has stood still ever since the Patriots crushed the Buffalo Bils, 56-10, last year on Sunday Night Football. How else could someone come up with a crazy line like Patriots (with Brady) -13 at San Francisco?
Secondly, and with not as much respect, if you bet on the next two Patriots games (on them this week and against them next week), your best hope is splitting out, but most likely 0-2.
the miami lost, i figure was going to happen.. if you look at records from history against miami, that is the only team that gives NE a hard time every season.. last year Miami only won 1 game, but remember when they played the NEP they came close to beating them....
i have to say NE this week, coming from a bye u cant go wrong.
0
the miami lost, i figure was going to happen.. if you look at records from history against miami, that is the only team that gives NE a hard time every season.. last year Miami only won 1 game, but remember when they played the NEP they came close to beating them....
i have to say NE this week, coming from a bye u cant go wrong.
play of the week? are you serious? all the games out there and you come up with this? is joe montana playing? is bill walsh back? id hate to be playing new england after that loss to miami. plus with a bye week belichick will have a great game plan for martz goofey offense. the clincher is jt o sullivan. you know a team is in serious trouble if they have a qb named jt o sullivan. san fran wont even be close in this game. play of the week, lol, good one.
0
play of the week? are you serious? all the games out there and you come up with this? is joe montana playing? is bill walsh back? id hate to be playing new england after that loss to miami. plus with a bye week belichick will have a great game plan for martz goofey offense. the clincher is jt o sullivan. you know a team is in serious trouble if they have a qb named jt o sullivan. san fran wont even be close in this game. play of the week, lol, good one.
play of the week on jt o sullivan against the patriots. i still cant get over that. i got one question. where do you buy your smoke at? it must be good. jt o sullivan dude. yeah im gonna back jt o sullivan as my play of the week. just as soon as i smoke this doobie im going to go bet it all on jt o sullivan. i love me some jt o sullivan. hes a proven pro bowler man. he'll tear up the weak patriots defense. jt o sullivan
0
play of the week on jt o sullivan against the patriots. i still cant get over that. i got one question. where do you buy your smoke at? it must be good. jt o sullivan dude. yeah im gonna back jt o sullivan as my play of the week. just as soon as i smoke this doobie im going to go bet it all on jt o sullivan. i love me some jt o sullivan. hes a proven pro bowler man. he'll tear up the weak patriots defense. jt o sullivan
seriously, jt o sullivan is going to beat the patriots? jt o sullivan? i got to get to the casino immediately and hammer san fran before vegas realizes how great jt o sullivan is and jacks up the line. jt o sullivan.
0
seriously, jt o sullivan is going to beat the patriots? jt o sullivan? i got to get to the casino immediately and hammer san fran before vegas realizes how great jt o sullivan is and jacks up the line. jt o sullivan.
the miami lost, i figure was going to happen.. if you look at records from history against miami, that is the only team that gives NE a hard time every season.. last year Miami only won 1 game, but remember when they played the NEP they came close to beating them....
i have to say NE this week, coming from a bye u cant go wrong.
That advice coming from someone whose memory is amiss and who couldn't be bothered to check the actual results of last year's two meetings between Miami and New England. The truth is that Miami didn't come close to beating New England last season. In their first meeting, the Patriots led 42-7 at halftime in Miami before cruising to a three touchdown win. In their second meeting, the Patriots led 28-0 at halftime before cruising to another three touchdown win.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coupee36:
the miami lost, i figure was going to happen.. if you look at records from history against miami, that is the only team that gives NE a hard time every season.. last year Miami only won 1 game, but remember when they played the NEP they came close to beating them....
i have to say NE this week, coming from a bye u cant go wrong.
That advice coming from someone whose memory is amiss and who couldn't be bothered to check the actual results of last year's two meetings between Miami and New England. The truth is that Miami didn't come close to beating New England last season. In their first meeting, the Patriots led 42-7 at halftime in Miami before cruising to a three touchdown win. In their second meeting, the Patriots led 28-0 at halftime before cruising to another three touchdown win.
the miami lost, i figure was going to happen.. if you look at records from history against miami, that is the only team that gives NE a hard time every season.. last year Miami only won 1 game, but remember when they played the NEP they came close to beating them....
i have to say NE this week, coming from a bye u cant go wrong.
Does it grate on anyone else that someone would write something like "if you look at records from history against miami", then immediately proceed to offer inaccurate information that shows that he didn't bother to "look at history against miami"? Unbelievable. Pats backers, you're going into war Sunday with the likes of Coupee36. Just remember that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Coupee36:
the miami lost, i figure was going to happen.. if you look at records from history against miami, that is the only team that gives NE a hard time every season.. last year Miami only won 1 game, but remember when they played the NEP they came close to beating them....
i have to say NE this week, coming from a bye u cant go wrong.
Does it grate on anyone else that someone would write something like "if you look at records from history against miami", then immediately proceed to offer inaccurate information that shows that he didn't bother to "look at history against miami"? Unbelievable. Pats backers, you're going into war Sunday with the likes of Coupee36. Just remember that.
Let me get this straight. So #16 mudcap is mocking J.T. O'Sullivan as some kind of unqualified NFL quarterback when the other team is about to start Matt Cassel?
Okey Dokey Then.
0
Let me get this straight. So #16 mudcap is mocking J.T. O'Sullivan as some kind of unqualified NFL quarterback when the other team is about to start Matt Cassel?
The 49ers are my team. JT O Sullivan is a better QB than Alex Smith. He keeps defenses honest because he is not afraid to let the ball fly. The defense is decent. Frank Gore is a good RB. That being said Im staying away from this game.
0
The 49ers are my team. JT O Sullivan is a better QB than Alex Smith. He keeps defenses honest because he is not afraid to let the ball fly. The defense is decent. Frank Gore is a good RB. That being said Im staying away from this game.
Bruschi54, I figure you know who's the underdog in this game but in that post you sound as if you think the Patriots are the underdog. A little confusing.
MB, you are correct. sorry for the confusion, as I didn't mean underdog in the sense of the line. Confusion all on my part. Again, I think SF could be a play, but by far not the best play of the board. I wouldn't touch at this point. Just like I thought the Angels would kill the Sox in the ALDS, you just never know what will happen with these Boston teams....Trends are the Trends in both sports. LAA 0-11 vs. BoSox....
0
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:
Bruschi54, I figure you know who's the underdog in this game but in that post you sound as if you think the Patriots are the underdog. A little confusing.
MB, you are correct. sorry for the confusion, as I didn't mean underdog in the sense of the line. Confusion all on my part. Again, I think SF could be a play, but by far not the best play of the board. I wouldn't touch at this point. Just like I thought the Angels would kill the Sox in the ALDS, you just never know what will happen with these Boston teams....Trends are the Trends in both sports. LAA 0-11 vs. BoSox....
Pats will get down early, Cassel won't get the ball to Moss and he'll start pouting, thus bringing his team down as he used to do as a Raider. SF 27 Pats 10.
0
Pats will get down early, Cassel won't get the ball to Moss and he'll start pouting, thus bringing his team down as he used to do as a Raider. SF 27 Pats 10.
Pats will get down early, Cassel won't get the ball to Moss and he'll start pouting, thus bringing his team down as he used to do as a Raider. SF 27 Pats 10.
That is unintelligent...Pats will be in this game..even with Sam Cassell QB
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasSharpie:
Pats will get down early, Cassel won't get the ball to Moss and he'll start pouting, thus bringing his team down as he used to do as a Raider. SF 27 Pats 10.
That is unintelligent...Pats will be in this game..even with Sam Cassell QB
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
