The only Texan game I saw was vs the Ravens last month. Man was it ugly. They're not as good as last season. Looks like they're in a slump now. Don't know how much Stefon Diggs impacted this team I remember early on seeing them as the hyped team. But without Diggs and Tank Dell it's gonna be tough. Chargers will probably bumble around a bit Kim Harbaugh and Chargers play a similar style as Ravens. I imagine the Chargers win by a TD here.
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
The only Texan game I saw was vs the Ravens last month. Man was it ugly. They're not as good as last season. Looks like they're in a slump now. Don't know how much Stefon Diggs impacted this team I remember early on seeing them as the hyped team. But without Diggs and Tank Dell it's gonna be tough. Chargers will probably bumble around a bit Kim Harbaugh and Chargers play a similar style as Ravens. I imagine the Chargers win by a TD here.
The only Texan game I saw was vs the Ravens last month. Man was it ugly. They're not as good as last season. Looks like they're in a slump now. Don't know how much Stefon Diggs impacted this team I remember early on seeing them as the hyped team. But without Diggs and Tank Dell it's gonna be tough. Chargers will probably bumble around a bit Kim Harbaugh and Chargers play a similar style as Ravens. I imagine the Chargers win by a TD here.
Texans offense has not been good. The defense is good but Stroud really regressed from last year when he looked like he might become the next Mahomes.
Texans did have regression indicators pounting to a less successful season this year.
I think next year will be their year now that those high expectations are off them.
.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma:
The only Texan game I saw was vs the Ravens last month. Man was it ugly. They're not as good as last season. Looks like they're in a slump now. Don't know how much Stefon Diggs impacted this team I remember early on seeing them as the hyped team. But without Diggs and Tank Dell it's gonna be tough. Chargers will probably bumble around a bit Kim Harbaugh and Chargers play a similar style as Ravens. I imagine the Chargers win by a TD here.
Texans offense has not been good. The defense is good but Stroud really regressed from last year when he looked like he might become the next Mahomes.
Texans did have regression indicators pounting to a less successful season this year.
I think next year will be their year now that those high expectations are off them.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means.
Read post #28
0
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means.
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means. Read post #28
thank you buddy. GL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means. Read post #28
Total yards margin 2cd half of season improvement or decline................................... Most SB Winners peak in total yards margin in the 2cd half of the season. KC did both of past 2 years. Keep in mind, a team only needs to improve, the amount does not matter as far as winning the SB. A half yard is good to go. Improved teams ................ Bucs +55.3............. largest improvement Lions +54.6. .. with injured defensive players Bills +10.7 Ravens +9.8 Vikings +7.13 Rams +4.9 ......... but outgained in 2cd half by 27 per game Eagles +3.3 SB Winner likely comes from this list.......... Team declined 2cd half of season .................. Packers -10.1 LAC -11.23 Broncos -17.15 Wash -17.8 Steelers -25.2 KC -27.7 .........yikkers and bringing up the rear. ...... Texans -69.9 .........wowser
Great research. Thanks for the time and effort.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Total yards margin 2cd half of season improvement or decline................................... Most SB Winners peak in total yards margin in the 2cd half of the season. KC did both of past 2 years. Keep in mind, a team only needs to improve, the amount does not matter as far as winning the SB. A half yard is good to go. Improved teams ................ Bucs +55.3............. largest improvement Lions +54.6. .. with injured defensive players Bills +10.7 Ravens +9.8 Vikings +7.13 Rams +4.9 ......... but outgained in 2cd half by 27 per game Eagles +3.3 SB Winner likely comes from this list.......... Team declined 2cd half of season .................. Packers -10.1 LAC -11.23 Broncos -17.15 Wash -17.8 Steelers -25.2 KC -27.7 .........yikkers and bringing up the rear. ...... Texans -69.9 .........wowser
From Comment #52 - We can make a case the hottest is also Ravens, off 4 wins and 4 ATS wins
You have a good point, TC. This query for PlayOff Home Favorites is fairly easy to compose or understand:
PO = 1 and HF and p:W and pp:W and ppp:W and pppp:W and p:ATSW and pp:ATSW and ppp:ATSW and pppp:ATSW (Lower case "p" stands for "previous".)
SU: 14-7-1 (2.6,66.7%)
ATS: 7-15 (-4.5,31.8%)
I did not take PIT because I have another query that says fade PIT (it is 2-9 ATS) based on the difference in team wins and # of weak DEF efforts the last five games.
0
@theclaw
From Comment #52 - We can make a case the hottest is also Ravens, off 4 wins and 4 ATS wins
You have a good point, TC. This query for PlayOff Home Favorites is fairly easy to compose or understand:
PO = 1 and HF and p:W and pp:W and ppp:W and pppp:W and p:ATSW and pp:ATSW and ppp:ATSW and pppp:ATSW (Lower case "p" stands for "previous".)
SU: 14-7-1 (2.6,66.7%)
ATS: 7-15 (-4.5,31.8%)
I did not take PIT because I have another query that says fade PIT (it is 2-9 ATS) based on the difference in team wins and # of weak DEF efforts the last five games.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means. Read post #28 thank you buddy. GL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by incognegro:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Quote Originally Posted by incognegro: Are there any bets yet? I haven’t seen any. I'll be on all 4 close win plays for half a unit not to be ignorant, but I don’t know what this means. Read post #28 thank you buddy. GL!
@theclaw From Comment #52 - We can make a case the hottest is also Ravens, off 4 wins and 4 ATS wins You have a good point, TC. This query for PlayOff Home Favorites is fairly easy to compose or understand: PO = 1 and HF and p:W and pp:W and ppp:W and pppp:W and p:ATSW and pp:ATSW and ppp:ATSW and pppp:ATSW (Lower case "p" stands for "previous".) SU: 14-7-1 (2.6,66.7%) ATS: 7-15 (-4.5,31.8%) I did not take PIT because I have another query that says fade PIT (it is 2-9 ATS) based on the difference in team wins and # of weak DEF efforts the last five games.
Thanks for that query
What is it ? Is that winning 4 straight and covering 4 straight ? Going into playoffs ?
0
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams:
@theclaw From Comment #52 - We can make a case the hottest is also Ravens, off 4 wins and 4 ATS wins You have a good point, TC. This query for PlayOff Home Favorites is fairly easy to compose or understand: PO = 1 and HF and p:W and pp:W and ppp:W and pppp:W and p:ATSW and pp:ATSW and ppp:ATSW and pppp:ATSW (Lower case "p" stands for "previous".) SU: 14-7-1 (2.6,66.7%) ATS: 7-15 (-4.5,31.8%) I did not take PIT because I have another query that says fade PIT (it is 2-9 ATS) based on the difference in team wins and # of weak DEF efforts the last five games.
Thanks for that query
What is it ? Is that winning 4 straight and covering 4 straight ? Going into playoffs ?
past 5 years 2019-2022 --- 63.8%..........pretty much right on the long term %.........indicating the method is still pretty sharp in today's NFL.
Not sure record last year, I thought it was 3-3 ATS that is what I had written down but then scratch off. There more them likely was some pushes but I may not have recorded them so W/L % Could be slightly lower.
This is a great method to use, I post this every year to very good success over the years.
I don't always take action on every game but this year I will. I can't argue with the results.
Bucs -3 over Wash --- 1.1 units
Packers +5 over Eagles --- 1.1 units
Broncos +8 over Bills --- 1.1 units
Rams I'll reluctantly take action on them as this method says they are the right play but wait out the line to see if it hits 3. Doubtful, may drop before it hits 3 but I could be wrong.
If I see it dropping to 2 I will grab it quick and try to get the 2.5 if possible if not take 2.
0
Close Wins ....................
with a 3 pt difference since 2005 through 2022
15 winning years out of 18
2 years at .500 ATS
1 losing year at only 2-3 ATS
58-33 ATS (63.7%)
past 5 years 2019-2022 --- 63.8%..........pretty much right on the long term %.........indicating the method is still pretty sharp in today's NFL.
Not sure record last year, I thought it was 3-3 ATS that is what I had written down but then scratch off. There more them likely was some pushes but I may not have recorded them so W/L % Could be slightly lower.
This is a great method to use, I post this every year to very good success over the years.
I don't always take action on every game but this year I will. I can't argue with the results.
Bucs -3 over Wash --- 1.1 units
Packers +5 over Eagles --- 1.1 units
Broncos +8 over Bills --- 1.1 units
Rams I'll reluctantly take action on them as this method says they are the right play but wait out the line to see if it hits 3. Doubtful, may drop before it hits 3 but I could be wrong.
If I see it dropping to 2 I will grab it quick and try to get the 2.5 if possible if not take 2.
Stoud appears to be regressed as he lost his top two WRs. If he is not good, he can't do what he does yesterday .... playing point guard, pass and pass and pass as the Chargers pressed against the run. Joe Mixon would not be able to run if Stroud was not able to do what he did yesterday.
The first and greatest victory is to conquer self
0
@theclaw
Stoud appears to be regressed as he lost his top two WRs. If he is not good, he can't do what he does yesterday .... playing point guard, pass and pass and pass as the Chargers pressed against the run. Joe Mixon would not be able to run if Stroud was not able to do what he did yesterday.
As it turned out, LAC were the biggest public play of the week according to guy on you tube.
So public did well in regular season and lose their 1st big play of playoffs.
Texans do fit the common denominators of surprise teams from the WC round.
I wont go against these teams until they no longer fit these common denominator.
Ravens didn't score 30 pts again to be a fade on that method, I don't know if it works in playoffs but can't rule it out but now the broke the string of 30 pt games.
They are not really any regression fade except maybe the hottest team but they don't fit this perfectly.
My other system will have a play on the Ravens next week.
I think it will be the right play.
0
As it turned out, LAC were the biggest public play of the week according to guy on you tube.
So public did well in regular season and lose their 1st big play of playoffs.
Texans do fit the common denominators of surprise teams from the WC round.
I wont go against these teams until they no longer fit these common denominator.
Ravens didn't score 30 pts again to be a fade on that method, I don't know if it works in playoffs but can't rule it out but now the broke the string of 30 pt games.
They are not really any regression fade except maybe the hottest team but they don't fit this perfectly.
My other system will have a play on the Ravens next week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.