CLOSE WINS ..................................2-1 ATS in WC
we have a play with a 3 pt diff
Bengals by 1 over the Bills
9ers by 1 over Boys
Giants by 2 over Eagles
Jags by 6 over KC
one play this week on the Jags
BLOWOUT WINS ....................................................... and BLOWOUT LOSSES
just for the record here is the teams in blowout wins and losses. Close wins being a negative while blowout wins a positive.
This is kind of crazy because we should know the better teams with better records and bigger point margins should have the most blowout wins and fewer blowout losses right ? And when we look at it there is one game doesn't quite fit that.
Eagles by 7 over Giants
9ers by 4 over Boys
Bills by 4 over Bengals
KC by 1 over Jags
wow, a 13-4 team no. 1 seed VS a 9-8 team and the top seed only has a 1 game advantage in blowout wins and blowout losses ? and it's the only game is even remotely close to being even. look at the other teams with better records and better pt margins, not really close. Crazy
KC has 7 close wins (a negative) and 5 blowout wins (a positive), so they have 2 more negatives then positives = (-2)
Jags have 4 close wins and 5 blowout wins, 1 more positive then negative = +1
fits right in with taking Jags in close wins
9ers are the best with 9 blowout wins and only 3 close wins, 6 more positives then negatives = +6
imagine that, a season with more then half your games won in blowout fashion.
Giants have 8 close wins and 1 blowout win = (-7)
for the record ...... Vikes the team they beat had 11 close wins and a paltry 2 blowout wins = (-9) easily the worst of any team. don't be fooled by their record
I don't have any history on blowout wins but will look into it for sure. with that said I can't imagine the method wouldn't be on Eagles with a 7 game edge and the largest of any game. But we can't just assume, it does fit the play I think is the right side anyway.