Come on LC,
This isn't exactly diversifying your risk:
You're risking 13 units on just the Giants with a Cowboys total that is dependent on how the Giants defense plays.
If the Giants lose by more than 7, that's more than 10 units down the hole. Then they are tied into a total a sweetheart teaser which needs 4 legs to hit.
That's the definition of taking a huge risk on one play.
Come on LC,
This isn't exactly diversifying your risk:
You're risking 13 units on just the Giants with a Cowboys total that is dependent on how the Giants defense plays.
If the Giants lose by more than 7, that's more than 10 units down the hole. Then they are tied into a total a sweetheart teaser which needs 4 legs to hit.
That's the definition of taking a huge risk on one play.
Wait maybe it's even MORE units!
Aren't the units posted units to WIN?
It's actually 24.7 units with the juice.
Wow...almost 25 units. In a single NFL weekend...
My god...
Wait maybe it's even MORE units!
Aren't the units posted units to WIN?
It's actually 24.7 units with the juice.
Wow...almost 25 units. In a single NFL weekend...
My god...
Not really sure. As LC pointed out, the Cowboys have been atrocious at covering spreads this big. It is an alarming spread and it's combined with the Giants embarrassment off of the Philly shutout.
I can't see a blowout so the only way believe the Cowboys cover is a 10 to 13 point win with a score, likely late (an Eli pick as he reverts back to his old ways will do the trick).
Lines that don't make a ton of sense to me obviously have me wary. I'm not big on this game at all but a Cowboys win by 14+ would surprise me a lot. The Giants being competitive to the end would not. I'm very surprised Vegas would put out a line this big on the Giants who are a very public team and were the league's comeback darlings just two weeks ago as they ran up scores. Makes me very suspicious as to where the books are on this game. They very well might be on the Cowboys as line has now dipped to 6.5. I'm on several others. Not a lot of interest in this one for me. Line for the Giants looks too good (and it looked too good against Philly too with a beat up O-Line that allegedly couldn't protect it's QB and they blew the Giants out).
Not really sure. As LC pointed out, the Cowboys have been atrocious at covering spreads this big. It is an alarming spread and it's combined with the Giants embarrassment off of the Philly shutout.
I can't see a blowout so the only way believe the Cowboys cover is a 10 to 13 point win with a score, likely late (an Eli pick as he reverts back to his old ways will do the trick).
Lines that don't make a ton of sense to me obviously have me wary. I'm not big on this game at all but a Cowboys win by 14+ would surprise me a lot. The Giants being competitive to the end would not. I'm very surprised Vegas would put out a line this big on the Giants who are a very public team and were the league's comeback darlings just two weeks ago as they ran up scores. Makes me very suspicious as to where the books are on this game. They very well might be on the Cowboys as line has now dipped to 6.5. I'm on several others. Not a lot of interest in this one for me. Line for the Giants looks too good (and it looked too good against Philly too with a beat up O-Line that allegedly couldn't protect it's QB and they blew the Giants out).
Come on LC,
This isn't exactly diversifying your risk:
You're risking 13 units on just the Giants with a Cowboys total that is dependent on how the Giants defense plays.
If the Giants lose by more than 7, that's more than 10 units down the hole. Then they are tied into a total a sweetheart teaser which needs 4 legs to hit.
That's the definition of taking a huge risk on one play.
[/Quote]
Come on LC,
This isn't exactly diversifying your risk:
You're risking 13 units on just the Giants with a Cowboys total that is dependent on how the Giants defense plays.
If the Giants lose by more than 7, that's more than 10 units down the hole. Then they are tied into a total a sweetheart teaser which needs 4 legs to hit.
That's the definition of taking a huge risk on one play.
[/Quote]
Come on LC,
This isn't exactly diversifying your risk:
You're risking 13 units on just the Giants with a Cowboys total that is dependent on how the Giants defense plays.
If the Giants lose by more than 7, that's more than 10 units down the hole. Then they are tied into a total a sweetheart teaser which needs 4 legs to hit.
That's the definition of taking a huge risk on one play.
Come on LC,
This isn't exactly diversifying your risk:
You're risking 13 units on just the Giants with a Cowboys total that is dependent on how the Giants defense plays.
If the Giants lose by more than 7, that's more than 10 units down the hole. Then they are tied into a total a sweetheart teaser which needs 4 legs to hit.
That's the definition of taking a huge risk on one play.
Uh no. I haven't posted a play of the year....in years...find a thread with a POY.
So you're inaccurate on the first shot.
And second, I'm 'lucky' when my team has the ball down 7 within a 10 point spread, having worked their way back inside the number the entire second half, and Denver covers with 15 seconds left when the Jets give the ball to them. Yes, Jets backers are the "lucky" ones there. What would Denver backers be there? The 'smart' ones???
So you're inaccurate on the second shot.
And to your third, "Stop spending your time on covers" shot.
I'm actually doing the most respectable thing of all, that is, giving my picks away for FREE with detailed explanation.
Are you trying to imply that touts and 'covers experts' are the REAL serious cappers?
Is Steve Stevens on MSNBC the REAL sharp???
Please kid, you've just said three things that are so beyond ignorant I'm not sure I should waste any more of my time explaining how things work in this capping world.
Now run along.
I've tried to explain to LC there are too many bets here and too much exposure. That is all.
He can continue to bet in this manner if he wants and of course he WILL have very good weeks forthcoming. He's a good capper. That doesn't disprove my comments in his thread in any way! It's too many games and too many units. I've said this to a million posters where I see it.
Uh no. I haven't posted a play of the year....in years...find a thread with a POY.
So you're inaccurate on the first shot.
And second, I'm 'lucky' when my team has the ball down 7 within a 10 point spread, having worked their way back inside the number the entire second half, and Denver covers with 15 seconds left when the Jets give the ball to them. Yes, Jets backers are the "lucky" ones there. What would Denver backers be there? The 'smart' ones???
So you're inaccurate on the second shot.
And to your third, "Stop spending your time on covers" shot.
I'm actually doing the most respectable thing of all, that is, giving my picks away for FREE with detailed explanation.
Are you trying to imply that touts and 'covers experts' are the REAL serious cappers?
Is Steve Stevens on MSNBC the REAL sharp???
Please kid, you've just said three things that are so beyond ignorant I'm not sure I should waste any more of my time explaining how things work in this capping world.
Now run along.
I've tried to explain to LC there are too many bets here and too much exposure. That is all.
He can continue to bet in this manner if he wants and of course he WILL have very good weeks forthcoming. He's a good capper. That doesn't disprove my comments in his thread in any way! It's too many games and too many units. I've said this to a million posters where I see it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.