All Forums | NFL Betting

NFL THURS Bears vs Packers, BAIT/TRAP line of the week here.

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 23470
Posts: 136
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #101
Just fade this idiot. He thought packers would beat 49ers by 10+ and Titans would beat Patriots. He would bet the packers if they were -7/-7.5+ but since it's under 7, he's betting the bears???? 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 5715
Posted: #102
First off, NO SUCH THING AS A TRAP. Second, the reason that Vegas era even money on games that are perceived as traps is because there are people who bite on the line, and people who have flawed thinking like you who go the opposite way because of the line. Like you said, if Vegas sets this line at 7+, most people are on GB. But they make it lower to get people thinking its a "trap" so they will bet the opposite side. That's how they use your perception against you (notice how I use perception instead of trap)
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 7150
Posted: #103

Safe play is GB ML (-230).

I'm personally playing GB 1st Half (-3) for 2 Units.

GL everyone

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2012
Posts: 8254
Posted: #104
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 331
Posted: #105
MY BOOK READ 4.5, BEARS IS THE PLAY!! I'M WITH U, SMALL PLAY ON THE UNDER 50, SINCE OVER LINE IS POUNDED. 
GL TONIGHT
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 6909
Posted: #106

 have final score

Packers 27

Bears 23

BOL

Fuck the books up!!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1158
Posted: #107
Quote Originally Posted by JLisBACK28:

Just fade this idiot. He thought packers would beat 49ers by 10+ and Titans would beat Patriots. He would bet the packers if they were -7/-7.5+ but since it's under 7, he's betting the bears???? 



He points out my two losses and I am fade material??
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1158
Posted: #108
Quote Originally Posted by Spartacus10:

First off, NO SUCH THING AS A TRAP. Second, the reason that Vegas era even money on games that are perceived as traps is because there are people who bite on the line, and people who have flawed thinking like you who go the opposite way because of the line. Like you said, if Vegas sets this line at 7+, most people are on GB. But they make it lower to get people thinking its a "trap" so they will bet the opposite side. That's how they use your perception against you (notice how I use perception instead of trap)



I would believe this had this been my first rodeo bro.....Been at this going on 17 years now.  I think I know a trap when I see one
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1158
Posted: #109
Guys,

The line movement is just in play to make the sides adjustable.  Or a big timer is pounding the Bears just to get GB at a favorable line and then pound GB at say -4 which is a key number.  There is value here from 4-6.  If the line jumps to GB -7.5 jump ship  fast
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1192
Posted: #110
Like it
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4418
Posted: #111

According to covers, this line opened @ GB -4.5 then shot up to GB -6.  Now, I've noticed that it's back down to GB -4.5.

I don't think the books are trying to screw w/ people in this game. If so, why not keep it at GB -4.5?  By moving it from -4.5 to -6, you only invite Bear action.  If you're trying to attract Bear action, then why move it back down to -4.5???

 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 20468
Posted: #112
Quote Originally Posted by composite:

According to covers, this line opened @ GB -4.5 then shot up to GB -6.  Now, I've noticed that it's back down to GB -4.5.

I don't think the books are trying to screw w/ people in this game. If so, why not keep it at GB -4.5?  By moving it from -4.5 to -6, you only invite Bear action.  If you're trying to attract Bear action, then why move it back down to -4.5???

 





 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 786
Posted: #113
Quote Originally Posted by mrquija27:

Geezy I said it you dumb shit.  Bears are the better team.  WTF all of a sudden QB is the only position that matters apparently.  LMAO!!!!  Dude Bears may even have better WRs now!!

       

I see Cutler 7/16 70 yards and 2 interceptions.... But I don't see you anywhere sir! The QB position matters now huh you dumb shit! 

You see... I didn't get on here bashing you.. I stated what looks like facts and you call me out with this bullshit above. Who's laughing their ass of now? I am straight to the bank! 

BTW.. Go see my post about this games total. I was all over this with a write up like Marty mother fucking Mcfly with the damn book to back to the future in my back pocket BIOTCH!!!,
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1580
Posted: #114
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #115
Yeah just fade this idiot all year
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1580
Posted: #116
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 6903
Posted: #117
bears should be covering this one imo
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #118
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #119
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 786
Posted: #120
Quote Originally Posted by CoverLane:

bears should be covering this one imo

Obviously your opinion fucking sucks 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 439
Posted: #121
Fade baby!!!!!!! 



Packers a little better then Colts huh?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3072
Posted: #122

I already had the Pack but I should have listen to your college pick today. Rutgers

Your pretty lucky at college picks bro.

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 6576
Posted: #123
I was all over the undre guys
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2002
Posts: 7112
Posted: #124
Guys, I followed Sharks so I was lucky.  We are all wrong sometimes.  Our opinions differ like in religion, the economy or politics.  Luckily this is only football.  I follow so many good posters in all the forums, without them I would be a goner. The issue of traps or no is an opinion.  You believe or you don't.
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 1158
Posted: #125
Quote Originally Posted by ShadowWarrior:

Guys, I followed Sharks so I was lucky.  We are all wrong sometimes.  Our opinions differ like in religion, the economy or politics.  Luckily this is only football.  I follow so many good posters in all the forums, without them I would be a goner. The issue of traps or no is an opinion.  You believe or you don't.



Well said shadow. 

I dont mind all the jabber mouths.  Its entertainment.  I am in the plus side on units with all sports so far so the ignorance with these guys is just silly.  I was on the wrong side but I still dont think the bet was awful and my judgement was still sound.  The Bears hurt themselves last night bad....actually surprised they didnt get blown out by more.  Their defense played very well and their offense was just simply awful.  And the Packers defense played well.  The Bears killed themselves, had they played better with better control of the football we would be singing a different tune right now
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.