1.) game plans are the same. RUN. Who's better at it? Seattle... 2.) both wide receiver groups are paltry at best. The chiefs haven't thrown a TD to a WR (regular season) since 2013. 3.) press coverage and 8 men in the box all game long by Seattle. Alex smith is last in the NFL in passes traveling beyond 10 yards. Seattle has a better Defense period. 4.) chiefs Oline has been decent, but the bills took it to em. Smith was running for his life. The Hawks have been getting pressure on the QB and forcing TO's in the las few weeks. Chiefs will become one dimensional ( as they are already to begin with). I'm a KC fan if that helps. Hawks win 23-16
Love your reasoning and writeup on the hawks. Im riding with them as well for your specific reasons. It makes total sense. Good luck and I think m. Lynch is gonna go off and hawks force at minimum 3 turnovers. GOOD LUCK TO ALL
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLGuru83:
1.) game plans are the same. RUN. Who's better at it? Seattle... 2.) both wide receiver groups are paltry at best. The chiefs haven't thrown a TD to a WR (regular season) since 2013. 3.) press coverage and 8 men in the box all game long by Seattle. Alex smith is last in the NFL in passes traveling beyond 10 yards. Seattle has a better Defense period. 4.) chiefs Oline has been decent, but the bills took it to em. Smith was running for his life. The Hawks have been getting pressure on the QB and forcing TO's in the las few weeks. Chiefs will become one dimensional ( as they are already to begin with). I'm a KC fan if that helps. Hawks win 23-16
Love your reasoning and writeup on the hawks. Im riding with them as well for your specific reasons. It makes total sense. Good luck and I think m. Lynch is gonna go off and hawks force at minimum 3 turnovers. GOOD LUCK TO ALL
I am not into online shouting matches either. When someone comes into my thread and says they're putting 2400 on one team and 550 on another. I would have to say your full of it and know nothing about sports wagering.
What kind of a bank are you working with that you just pop goes the weasel on to the covers scene 2 days ago telling me you're a KC fan throwing 3k around. Never heard of ya buddy, and can care less who your team is, and what you're betting, and for how much you're bet-n it. Where's your thread posting these 2 plays ??. You're waiting for my reasons for you to take KC ?. I cant wait to give you my reason for you to take KC..unfortunately you're not going to understand any of my reasons for you to take KC one iota and never will... matter of fact... I don't want you to take KC..I want you to take Seattle so you lose your A*ss. I hope I make myself perfectly clear.
I will not be responding to anymore of your dribble. So don't bother responding.... just read it and weep.
I get the same CRAP from this Idiot Peter10 in my threads and all he does is whine & whine about my plays.
Funny thing is he NEVER POSTS his Plays but makes his Presumptions in everyones threads of his so called Einstein predictions & negative comments of others ... Pathetic
What do you call an Eternal Optimist? An accordion with a beeper!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
I am not into online shouting matches either. When someone comes into my thread and says they're putting 2400 on one team and 550 on another. I would have to say your full of it and know nothing about sports wagering.
What kind of a bank are you working with that you just pop goes the weasel on to the covers scene 2 days ago telling me you're a KC fan throwing 3k around. Never heard of ya buddy, and can care less who your team is, and what you're betting, and for how much you're bet-n it. Where's your thread posting these 2 plays ??. You're waiting for my reasons for you to take KC ?. I cant wait to give you my reason for you to take KC..unfortunately you're not going to understand any of my reasons for you to take KC one iota and never will... matter of fact... I don't want you to take KC..I want you to take Seattle so you lose your A*ss. I hope I make myself perfectly clear.
I will not be responding to anymore of your dribble. So don't bother responding.... just read it and weep.
I get the same CRAP from this Idiot Peter10 in my threads and all he does is whine & whine about my plays.
Funny thing is he NEVER POSTS his Plays but makes his Presumptions in everyones threads of his so called Einstein predictions & negative comments of others ... Pathetic
I didn't mean to offend you dude. I've been betting On the NFL and MLB since I was 18. Let the best man win. Take KC I'm on Seattle. I'm not into the lingo used online in sports betting threads. Just started using the threads and posting my OPINION. Don't get your panties in a wad. Chill... I'm still here to be cordial. GL
Let the best man win.?....lol
Take your opinion and your panties.. and go be cordial elsewhere.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLGuru83:
I didn't mean to offend you dude. I've been betting On the NFL and MLB since I was 18. Let the best man win. Take KC I'm on Seattle. I'm not into the lingo used online in sports betting threads. Just started using the threads and posting my OPINION. Don't get your panties in a wad. Chill... I'm still here to be cordial. GL
Let the best man win.?....lol
Take your opinion and your panties.. and go be cordial elsewhere.
I get the same CRAP from this Idiot Peter10 in my threads and all he does is whine & whine about my plays.
Funny thing is he NEVER POSTS his Plays but makes his Presumptions in everyones threads of his so called Einstein predictions & negative comments of others ... Pathetic
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:
I get the same CRAP from this Idiot Peter10 in my threads and all he does is whine & whine about my plays.
Funny thing is he NEVER POSTS his Plays but makes his Presumptions in everyones threads of his so called Einstein predictions & negative comments of others ... Pathetic
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least.
Did you know Seattle is 2-24 SU away vs. .665 or greater AFC West foes. 4-17 ATS last 21 @ Kansas City. May not mean anything. However, the path Seattle has been taking on the road this year could qualify.Does Seattle have any skeletons in the closet ?
This stat is from a time period when Seattle played in the AFC WEST, but now currently reside in the NFC WEST. Additionally, Seattle wasn't very good back then. Wilson and Co. Had nothing to do with those PAST results. Whoever plays the field position game better wins. That involves special teams, which KC does have the upper hand. But, with all of the Seahawks getting healthy ( LB Malcolm Smith, SS Kam Chancellor and they have CB Byron Maxwell back, CB/SpecialTeams man Jeremy Lane) it improves their chances of winning. That's just to name a few. They are still banged up though. The Seahawks win the TurnOver battle and get ahead early never allowing the Chiefs to recover. Alex Smith will look as bad as Phillip Rivers did against the dolphins, if and when he throws. KC RECEIVERS GET NO SEPARATION ON CB's. They do have a shot to hit TE Kelce for some good yardage, but expect the chiefs to gain 175 passing and 125 rushing. Smith throws 2INTs. Seahawks in a "stunner." Chiefs won't stop the rushing attack of the Seahawks. The chiefs lost starting LB Derrick Johnson for the year along with DL Mike Devito (earlier in the season of course). Point being, KC is doing it with guys stepping up. Chiefs are awesome dogs under Reid in his short tenure, but are not as strong a play when favored. With that said, BOL TO ALL.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
Did you know Seattle is 2-24 SU away vs. .665 or greater AFC West foes. 4-17 ATS last 21 @ Kansas City. May not mean anything. However, the path Seattle has been taking on the road this year could qualify.Does Seattle have any skeletons in the closet ?
This stat is from a time period when Seattle played in the AFC WEST, but now currently reside in the NFC WEST. Additionally, Seattle wasn't very good back then. Wilson and Co. Had nothing to do with those PAST results. Whoever plays the field position game better wins. That involves special teams, which KC does have the upper hand. But, with all of the Seahawks getting healthy ( LB Malcolm Smith, SS Kam Chancellor and they have CB Byron Maxwell back, CB/SpecialTeams man Jeremy Lane) it improves their chances of winning. That's just to name a few. They are still banged up though. The Seahawks win the TurnOver battle and get ahead early never allowing the Chiefs to recover. Alex Smith will look as bad as Phillip Rivers did against the dolphins, if and when he throws. KC RECEIVERS GET NO SEPARATION ON CB's. They do have a shot to hit TE Kelce for some good yardage, but expect the chiefs to gain 175 passing and 125 rushing. Smith throws 2INTs. Seahawks in a "stunner." Chiefs won't stop the rushing attack of the Seahawks. The chiefs lost starting LB Derrick Johnson for the year along with DL Mike Devito (earlier in the season of course). Point being, KC is doing it with guys stepping up. Chiefs are awesome dogs under Reid in his short tenure, but are not as strong a play when favored. With that said, BOL TO ALL.
I get the same CRAP from this Idiot Peter10 in my threads and
all he does is whine & whine about my plays. Funny thing is he NEVER POSTS his Plays but makes his Presumptions in everyones threads of his so called Einstein predictions & negative comments of others ... Pathetic
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least.
Wizer, YOU keep posting little jabs. I'm not Bipolar man. Due your write-up and quit wasting time...
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:
I get the same CRAP from this Idiot Peter10 in my threads and
all he does is whine & whine about my plays. Funny thing is he NEVER POSTS his Plays but makes his Presumptions in everyones threads of his so called Einstein predictions & negative comments of others ... Pathetic
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least.
Wizer, YOU keep posting little jabs. I'm not Bipolar man. Due your write-up and quit wasting time...
Wizer,.......Saints line moving up to 7.5...same one point movement as last week vs Niners......but Bengals are not the Niners....might go a bit bigger on this one......your thoughts appreciated....
0
Wizer,.......Saints line moving up to 7.5...same one point movement as last week vs Niners......but Bengals are not the Niners....might go a bit bigger on this one......your thoughts appreciated....
This stat is from a time period when Seattle played in the AFC WEST, but now currently reside in the NFC WEST. Additionally, Seattle wasn't very good back then. Wilson and Co. Had nothing to do with those PAST results. Whoever plays the field position game better wins. That involves special teams, which KC does have the upper hand. But, with all of the Seahawks getting healthy ( LB Malcolm Smith, SS Kam Chancellor and they have CB Byron Maxwell back, CB/SpecialTeams man Jeremy Lane) it improves their chances of winning. That's just to name a few. They are still banged up though. The Seahawks win the TurnOver battle and get ahead early never allowing the Chiefs to recover. Alex Smith will look as bad as Phillip Rivers did against the dolphins, if and when he throws. KC RECEIVERS GET NO SEPARATION ON CB's. They do have a shot to hit TE Kelce for some good yardage, but expect the chiefs to gain 175 passing and 125 rushing. Smith throws 2INTs. Seahawks in a "stunner." Chiefs won't stop the rushing attack of the Seahawks. The chiefs lost starting LB Derrick Johnson for the year along with DL Mike Devito (earlier in the season of course). Point being, KC is doing it with guys stepping up. Chiefs are awesome dogs under Reid in his short tenure, but are not as strong a play when favored. With that said, BOL TO ALL.
Yes, we know where the Seahawks reside. Apparently they weren't very good back then... and apparently if you have been paying attention--> they are not very good on the road this year either ..and also "if you were paying attention".. you would have noticed that I said the stat may not mean anything but may qualify in this spot seattle is in here, the way they have been playing on the road this year: Crushed by SD( an AFC West team ??...hint) beat by Stl and barely got by @ Carolina and Wash.. yea okay..lol. Yea, they're real good. I think your base-n your play off the last game they played...BIG mistake. Chiefs are awesome as dogs but not when fav. The real line opened as KC +1. Okay lets go your way... So Seattle's the dog..? --> 0-4 ATS as non conf dogs <5 pts
Good Luck
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLGuru83:
This stat is from a time period when Seattle played in the AFC WEST, but now currently reside in the NFC WEST. Additionally, Seattle wasn't very good back then. Wilson and Co. Had nothing to do with those PAST results. Whoever plays the field position game better wins. That involves special teams, which KC does have the upper hand. But, with all of the Seahawks getting healthy ( LB Malcolm Smith, SS Kam Chancellor and they have CB Byron Maxwell back, CB/SpecialTeams man Jeremy Lane) it improves their chances of winning. That's just to name a few. They are still banged up though. The Seahawks win the TurnOver battle and get ahead early never allowing the Chiefs to recover. Alex Smith will look as bad as Phillip Rivers did against the dolphins, if and when he throws. KC RECEIVERS GET NO SEPARATION ON CB's. They do have a shot to hit TE Kelce for some good yardage, but expect the chiefs to gain 175 passing and 125 rushing. Smith throws 2INTs. Seahawks in a "stunner." Chiefs won't stop the rushing attack of the Seahawks. The chiefs lost starting LB Derrick Johnson for the year along with DL Mike Devito (earlier in the season of course). Point being, KC is doing it with guys stepping up. Chiefs are awesome dogs under Reid in his short tenure, but are not as strong a play when favored. With that said, BOL TO ALL.
Yes, we know where the Seahawks reside. Apparently they weren't very good back then... and apparently if you have been paying attention--> they are not very good on the road this year either ..and also "if you were paying attention".. you would have noticed that I said the stat may not mean anything but may qualify in this spot seattle is in here, the way they have been playing on the road this year: Crushed by SD( an AFC West team ??...hint) beat by Stl and barely got by @ Carolina and Wash.. yea okay..lol. Yea, they're real good. I think your base-n your play off the last game they played...BIG mistake. Chiefs are awesome as dogs but not when fav. The real line opened as KC +1. Okay lets go your way... So Seattle's the dog..? --> 0-4 ATS as non conf dogs <5 pts
I just started using this site and will post my plays on here Wizer. I'm NEW to the site man, relax. I'm here to stay dude. I'm just going to post for one week and then disappear. Therefore, nice to meet you man. GL with KC
0
I just started using this site and will post my plays on here Wizer. I'm NEW to the site man, relax. I'm here to stay dude. I'm just going to post for one week and then disappear. Therefore, nice to meet you man. GL with KC
Thinking that kc is built like the Cowboys good o line great running back it was enough for Dallas then you have arrowhead also. Anyways good luck to all
0
Thinking that kc is built like the Cowboys good o line great running back it was enough for Dallas then you have arrowhead also. Anyways good luck to all
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least. Wizer, YOU keep posting little jabs. I'm not Bipolar man. Due your write-up and quit wasting time...
.........DUE...
0
Quote Originally Posted by NFLGuru83:
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least. Wizer, YOU keep posting little jabs. I'm not Bipolar man. Due your write-up and quit wasting time...
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least.Wizer, YOU keep posting little jabs. I'm not Bipolar man. Due your write-up and quit wasting time...
.........DUE...
Wow. I don't proof read something and misspell a word. You're a piece of work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Wizerguy:
Quote Originally Posted by NFLGuru83:
Yea...they dumb their load... then when we respond, they say they don't want to offend anybody and just be cordial. Bipolar to say the least.Wizer, YOU keep posting little jabs. I'm not Bipolar man. Due your write-up and quit wasting time...
.........DUE...
Wow. I don't proof read something and misspell a word. You're a piece of work.
Thinking that kc is built like the Cowboys good o line great running back it was enough for Dallas then you have arrowhead also. Anyways good luck to all
KC has a revamped Oline this year, but has survived and thrived at times. The plays teams are able to run are based off of their personnel. The cowboys have way more weapons on offense than KC (Dez, Witten, Williams). Murray and Jamaal is a wash, but Romo is better than Smith. Point being, IMO Dallas is a stronger offensive unit than KC by a wide margin. So, the Seahawks have a simple game plan. Stop 25 and you most likely create an offense that will stall and stall fairly quickly. BOL
0
Quote Originally Posted by completesr:
Thinking that kc is built like the Cowboys good o line great running back it was enough for Dallas then you have arrowhead also. Anyways good luck to all
KC has a revamped Oline this year, but has survived and thrived at times. The plays teams are able to run are based off of their personnel. The cowboys have way more weapons on offense than KC (Dez, Witten, Williams). Murray and Jamaal is a wash, but Romo is better than Smith. Point being, IMO Dallas is a stronger offensive unit than KC by a wide margin. So, the Seahawks have a simple game plan. Stop 25 and you most likely create an offense that will stall and stall fairly quickly. BOL
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.