Great spot to fade Lions this week. BF fade playing on a high u sustainable level of play and they are off the 2 largest win margins in past 3 games along with their 2 largest pts scored in those games both ridiculous high margins of victory and pts scored.
They meet the regression method I talked about last week I saw online, teams off 4 straight wins and 4 straight games scoring 30 pts or better. Lions scored 40 or more in 3 of 4.
And they meet my new BF II regression method, a completely different regression method using different info.
That's 3 regression methods fading Lions.
Steve Fezzik has a fade as well.
Packers +3.5 (-115) over Li9ns --- 1.15 units
4
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Great spot to fade Lions this week. BF fade playing on a high u sustainable level of play and they are off the 2 largest win margins in past 3 games along with their 2 largest pts scored in those games both ridiculous high margins of victory and pts scored.
They meet the regression method I talked about last week I saw online, teams off 4 straight wins and 4 straight games scoring 30 pts or better. Lions scored 40 or more in 3 of 4.
And they meet my new BF II regression method, a completely different regression method using different info.
I have uncovered a new bounce factor I will call BF II.
I have followed this in the past but didn't really know how to set the parameters for the method. What level of extreme play would be needed for teams to regress ?
But This season I think I have a much better understanding of these parameters.
This week there are 2 plays. 1 play is a fade on the Lions. The other play I am waiting out the line.
But both plays are also my original BF plays as well.
I will track the new BF II record and the record when both BF's are on the same play.
This method does not produce alot of plays though.
3-0 ATS so far this season.so 5 plays thus far.
Last season this new BF did not lose a game with maybe 10-12 plays.
Obviously this method is going to lose games I need more research but feel comfortable enough to post the plays.
I track it back many season but not over the entire season in those years. In the early part of the season to very strong success.
Those early season 3-0 ATS results also had the Bator method fading the same team.
This week's Bator fade on the Bills is not a fade on this method.
Maybe by adding this method to the Bator method and to my original BF we can come up with an incredible high probability regression method.
0
I have uncovered a new bounce factor I will call BF II.
I have followed this in the past but didn't really know how to set the parameters for the method. What level of extreme play would be needed for teams to regress ?
But This season I think I have a much better understanding of these parameters.
This week there are 2 plays. 1 play is a fade on the Lions. The other play I am waiting out the line.
But both plays are also my original BF plays as well.
I will track the new BF II record and the record when both BF's are on the same play.
This method does not produce alot of plays though.
3-0 ATS so far this season.so 5 plays thus far.
Last season this new BF did not lose a game with maybe 10-12 plays.
Obviously this method is going to lose games I need more research but feel comfortable enough to post the plays.
I track it back many season but not over the entire season in those years. In the early part of the season to very strong success.
Those early season 3-0 ATS results also had the Bator method fading the same team.
This week's Bator fade on the Bills is not a fade on this method.
Maybe by adding this method to the Bator method and to my original BF we can come up with an incredible high probability regression method.
You do realize Love may not play .. I like packers in this spot but not if love dosent play
I beg to differ my friend. I have watched every Packers game this year, fwiw...
Dude when Malik Willis is in, the Packers offense takes on another identity, and for the good imo. I know that Malik isn't the pure passer that Love is. But they run the crap out of the ball with Malik. They run more jumbo formations, and their play action pass looks stellar. Malik has been very good this year when called upon.
Just my 2 cents
2
Quote Originally Posted by WilliamMunny:
You do realize Love may not play .. I like packers in this spot but not if love dosent play
I beg to differ my friend. I have watched every Packers game this year, fwiw...
Dude when Malik Willis is in, the Packers offense takes on another identity, and for the good imo. I know that Malik isn't the pure passer that Love is. But they run the crap out of the ball with Malik. They run more jumbo formations, and their play action pass looks stellar. Malik has been very good this year when called upon.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.