Besides the obvious that there are no fans, or not many, the playoffs differ this year because there is only one bye and the other games are more similar to week 17 games, where both teams come off a week of rest.
My historical data for the games with neither team has a bye will use games 17/18 data.....TB/NO and BB/BR.
1) Divisional away dogs have been 13-5 ATS (+5.64) and 9-9 straight up.....Bucs
2) Game 18 away dogs with greater than ten wins on the season have been:
a) 16-16 ATS on Saturday.....Ravens
b) 23-16 ATS on Sunday.......Browns, Bucs
Equal to or less than tens wins as away dogs, 8-5 ATS, though only 2-4 ATS on Saturday......Rams
3) Away dogs games 17, 18 have been 33-15 ATS (+3.05), 24-25 straight up if they won more games last season than their present opponent....Ravens
AD and playoffs = 1 and 19>game number >16 and PRSW>o:PRSW
4) The team with the average yards per pass differential (offense to defense) has been 108-61 ATS in the first two rounds of the playoffs....35-22 ATS in game 18s.
a) home favorites with the better passing team..... 57-45 ATS....Chiefs, Bills
b) away dogs with the better passing team....37-16 ATS........Bucs
no advantage....Rams/Packers
1
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Besides the obvious that there are no fans, or not many, the playoffs differ this year because there is only one bye and the other games are more similar to week 17 games, where both teams come off a week of rest.
My historical data for the games with neither team has a bye will use games 17/18 data.....TB/NO and BB/BR.
1) Divisional away dogs have been 13-5 ATS (+5.64) and 9-9 straight up.....Bucs
2) Game 18 away dogs with greater than ten wins on the season have been:
a) 16-16 ATS on Saturday.....Ravens
b) 23-16 ATS on Sunday.......Browns, Bucs
Equal to or less than tens wins as away dogs, 8-5 ATS, though only 2-4 ATS on Saturday......Rams
3) Away dogs games 17, 18 have been 33-15 ATS (+3.05), 24-25 straight up if they won more games last season than their present opponent....Ravens
AD and playoffs = 1 and 19>game number >16 and PRSW>o:PRSW
4) The team with the average yards per pass differential (offense to defense) has been 108-61 ATS in the first two rounds of the playoffs....35-22 ATS in game 18s.
a) home favorites with the better passing team..... 57-45 ATS....Chiefs, Bills
b) away dogs with the better passing team....37-16 ATS........Bucs
Away dogs in the first two rounds of the playoffs whose offensive yards per pass is greater than .7 more than their average defensive yards per pass allowed.
Team Offensive Yards per Pass Defensive Yards per Pass
Bucs 7.5 6.4
Rams 6.8 5.6
Ravens 6.8 5.9
45-27-1 ATS (+1.70), 31-43 straight up (-3.61), including 39-21 ATS if the team in question won one or zero playoff games the previous season......Rams, Ravens, Bucs
19>game number >16 and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA) > .7 and AD
0
Away dogs in the first two rounds of the playoffs whose offensive yards per pass is greater than .7 more than their average defensive yards per pass allowed.
Team Offensive Yards per Pass Defensive Yards per Pass
Bucs 7.5 6.4
Rams 6.8 5.6
Ravens 6.8 5.9
45-27-1 ATS (+1.70), 31-43 straight up (-3.61), including 39-21 ATS if the team in question won one or zero playoff games the previous season......Rams, Ravens, Bucs
19>game number >16 and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA) > .7 and AD
I dont like the Bills but I not a fan of the Ravens in the final 8 or final 4 if they get past this week. Nothing against the superstar QB but he was the only thing they had going last week. If that happens again its lights out. Good news for the Ravens, Buffalo has issues too. The line is moving towards the Ravens. Will they end up a pickem or road chalk again?
I have a few queries against the Ravens because of their current ats streak but Buffalo is also on fire. If Buffalo is a pick or better I might get involved.
Best wishes Indigo.
Nothing is ever in the bank until it is in the bank
1
I dont like the Bills but I not a fan of the Ravens in the final 8 or final 4 if they get past this week. Nothing against the superstar QB but he was the only thing they had going last week. If that happens again its lights out. Good news for the Ravens, Buffalo has issues too. The line is moving towards the Ravens. Will they end up a pickem or road chalk again?
I have a few queries against the Ravens because of their current ats streak but Buffalo is also on fire. If Buffalo is a pick or better I might get involved.
Away dogs in non-Super Bowl games in the playoffs with a positive average yards per game rushing differential of at least 15 yards/game and a positive yards per pass differential.....
Bucs, Ravens, Browns, Rams.
26-9-1 ATS (+3.83) and 18-18 straight up (-.89)
playoffs=1 and C and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and tA(RY-o:RY)>15 and AD
If their opponent is on at least a 2 game winning streak this moves to 13-3 ATS
Ravens, Rams, Bucs
1
Thanks Buddy....
Away dogs in non-Super Bowl games in the playoffs with a positive average yards per game rushing differential of at least 15 yards/game and a positive yards per pass differential.....
Bucs, Ravens, Browns, Rams.
26-9-1 ATS (+3.83) and 18-18 straight up (-.89)
playoffs=1 and C and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and tA(RY-o:RY)>15 and AD
If their opponent is on at least a 2 game winning streak this moves to 13-3 ATS
Question for you, buddy. What happens to a team in its 4th game, playing against a non-divisional opponent, after playing division opponents in 3 consecutive games. And this can include regular season spilling into the playoffs. Because I’m sure you won’t find many teams playing 3 consecutive division games just in the regular season. Thanks.
1
Question for you, buddy. What happens to a team in its 4th game, playing against a non-divisional opponent, after playing division opponents in 3 consecutive games. And this can include regular season spilling into the playoffs. Because I’m sure you won’t find many teams playing 3 consecutive division games just in the regular season. Thanks.
Question for you, buddy. What happens to a team in its 4th game, playing against a non-divisional opponent, after playing division opponents in 3 consecutive games. And this can include regular season spilling into the playoffs. Because I’m sure you won’t find many teams playing 3 consecutive division games just in the regular season. Thanks.
A team playing a non-divisional team after playing 3 (or more) divisional opponents as an away dog have been 7-3-1 ATS in the playoffs (though 6-2 ATS in game number 17). In the regular season they've been a mediocre 71-80 in this scenario, 31-28 ATS in December games.
playoffs and p:DIV and pp:DIV and ppp:DIV and not DIV and AD and month
Rams
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
playoffs=1 and C and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and tA(RY-o:RY)>15 and AD this shows an error, can you check it please ?
It has worked fine for me....though the database has not updated to show this week's indicted teams.
0
A team playi
Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy:
Question for you, buddy. What happens to a team in its 4th game, playing against a non-divisional opponent, after playing division opponents in 3 consecutive games. And this can include regular season spilling into the playoffs. Because I’m sure you won’t find many teams playing 3 consecutive division games just in the regular season. Thanks.
A team playing a non-divisional team after playing 3 (or more) divisional opponents as an away dog have been 7-3-1 ATS in the playoffs (though 6-2 ATS in game number 17). In the regular season they've been a mediocre 71-80 in this scenario, 31-28 ATS in December games.
playoffs and p:DIV and pp:DIV and ppp:DIV and not DIV and AD and month
Rams
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
playoffs=1 and C and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and tA(RY-o:RY)>15 and AD this shows an error, can you check it please ?
It has worked fine for me....though the database has not updated to show this week's indicted teams.
A team playi Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy: Question for you, buddy. What happens to a team in its 4th game, playing against a non-divisional opponent, after playing division opponents in 3 consecutive games. And this can include regular season spilling into the playoffs. Because I’m sure you won’t find many teams playing 3 consecutive division games just in the regular season. Thanks. A team playing a non-divisional team after playing 3 (or more) divisional opponents as an away dog have been 7-3-1 ATS in the playoffs (though 6-2 ATS in game number 17). In the regular season they've been a mediocre 71-80 in this scenario, 31-28 ATS in December games. playoffs and p:DIV and pp:DIV and ppp:DIV and not DIV and AD and month Rams Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: playoffs=1 and C and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and tA(RY-o:RY)>15 and AD this shows an error, can you check it please ? It has worked fine for me....though the database has not updated to show this week's indicted teams.
Wow. Thank you, buddy. Very surprised by those numbers. I thought they’d be going the other way. Rams coming off 3 hard fought divisional games, with each game getting bigger in magnitude...Logically, I don’t see it (playing the Rams) but I’ll respect the trend and tease the Packers to -1. One last question. What was the SU record of those road dogs in the games you tallied? Thanks.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
A team playi Quote Originally Posted by begginerboy: Question for you, buddy. What happens to a team in its 4th game, playing against a non-divisional opponent, after playing division opponents in 3 consecutive games. And this can include regular season spilling into the playoffs. Because I’m sure you won’t find many teams playing 3 consecutive division games just in the regular season. Thanks. A team playing a non-divisional team after playing 3 (or more) divisional opponents as an away dog have been 7-3-1 ATS in the playoffs (though 6-2 ATS in game number 17). In the regular season they've been a mediocre 71-80 in this scenario, 31-28 ATS in December games. playoffs and p:DIV and pp:DIV and ppp:DIV and not DIV and AD and month Rams Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: playoffs=1 and C and tA(YPPA-o:YPPA)-oA(YPPA-o:YPPA)>0 and tA(RY-o:RY)>15 and AD this shows an error, can you check it please ? It has worked fine for me....though the database has not updated to show this week's indicted teams.
Wow. Thank you, buddy. Very surprised by those numbers. I thought they’d be going the other way. Rams coming off 3 hard fought divisional games, with each game getting bigger in magnitude...Logically, I don’t see it (playing the Rams) but I’ll respect the trend and tease the Packers to -1. One last question. What was the SU record of those road dogs in the games you tallied? Thanks.
@begginerboy average line +6.3, 7-3-1 ATS (+1.55), 3-8 straight up (-4.73) overall average total 43.7, 3-8 O/U (-4.27) 2-1 ATS, 2-1 straight up on Saturday games.
Thank you!
1
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
@begginerboy average line +6.3, 7-3-1 ATS (+1.55), 3-8 straight up (-4.73) overall average total 43.7, 3-8 O/U (-4.27) 2-1 ATS, 2-1 straight up on Saturday games.
I'd say there is a very good possibility tha that the Ravens will outrush the Bills in their playoff game on Saturday.
How do those teams do in the playoffs on the road?
If Ihey are both playing the same game number,...that is, no team is off a bye, those away teams in the playoffs in conference games have been 35-9 ATS, covering by over 7 points per game.
If our away team won more games last season, this moves to 17-3 ATS, 18-2 straight up.....11-0 ATS and 10-1 straight up if they're an away dog.......Ravens.
playoffs = 1 and C and RY>o:RY and AD and o:game number = game number and PRSW>o:PRSW
0
I'd say there is a very good possibility tha that the Ravens will outrush the Bills in their playoff game on Saturday.
How do those teams do in the playoffs on the road?
If Ihey are both playing the same game number,...that is, no team is off a bye, those away teams in the playoffs in conference games have been 35-9 ATS, covering by over 7 points per game.
If our away team won more games last season, this moves to 17-3 ATS, 18-2 straight up.....11-0 ATS and 10-1 straight up if they're an away dog.......Ravens.
playoffs = 1 and C and RY>o:RY and AD and o:game number = game number and PRSW>o:PRSW
Teams that played >=3 playoffs games the season prior, playing at home the next season in the playoffs....how have they done the following year?
1) Playoffs first round at home 11-10 ATS, (-0.69), 13-8 straight up (+5.29).......Chiefs
2) Playoffs second round at home 0-5 ATS (-10.90), 3-2 ATS (-2.60)
Sagarin's power ratings have the Bills, Ravens and Chiefs all within one point of each other, so the Chiefs will likely be a field goal or less as a home favorite should they get by the Browns this weekend.
I'll be fading the Chiefs next weekend should they win their first round playoff game.
playoffs = 1 and C and tpS(playoffs)>=3 and H and game number
3
Teams that played >=3 playoffs games the season prior, playing at home the next season in the playoffs....how have they done the following year?
1) Playoffs first round at home 11-10 ATS, (-0.69), 13-8 straight up (+5.29).......Chiefs
2) Playoffs second round at home 0-5 ATS (-10.90), 3-2 ATS (-2.60)
Sagarin's power ratings have the Bills, Ravens and Chiefs all within one point of each other, so the Chiefs will likely be a field goal or less as a home favorite should they get by the Browns this weekend.
I'll be fading the Chiefs next weekend should they win their first round playoff game.
playoffs = 1 and C and tpS(playoffs)>=3 and H and game number
Mind Boggling how the ram's who lost to The Jet's in week 15 are getting so much respect. why because they beat a crappy seattle team. Green Bay will Destroy this team It should be a Double Digit line but Vegas is trying to get enough suckers on the ram's and they are..
0
Mind Boggling how the ram's who lost to The Jet's in week 15 are getting so much respect. why because they beat a crappy seattle team. Green Bay will Destroy this team It should be a Double Digit line but Vegas is trying to get enough suckers on the ram's and they are..
Mind Boggling how the ram's who lost to The Jet's in week 15 are getting so much respect. why because they beat a crappy seattle team. Green Bay will Destroy this team It should be a Double Digit line but Vegas is trying to get enough suckers on the ram's and they are..
You sound angry about it.....if everyone agreed with you, the Packers would be -24.
Differing opinions are what makes a market, so count your blessings that there are vast amounts of people that disagree with you.
5
@carguy342005
Quote Originally Posted by carguy342005:
Mind Boggling how the ram's who lost to The Jet's in week 15 are getting so much respect. why because they beat a crappy seattle team. Green Bay will Destroy this team It should be a Double Digit line but Vegas is trying to get enough suckers on the ram's and they are..
You sound angry about it.....if everyone agreed with you, the Packers would be -24.
Differing opinions are what makes a market, so count your blessings that there are vast amounts of people that disagree with you.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.