All Forums | NFL Betting

Record Numbers Coming in on Green Bay

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 27765
Posts: 173
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1999
Posted: #151
Specially when they really have no idea about the real public numbers..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2011
Posts: 1999
Posted: #152
Uh Oh needed that TO

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 828
Posted: #153
Like I said.... Rodgers over cutler
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2010
Posts: 487
Posted: #154
GB
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #155

Quote Originally Posted by cdubz34:

Like I said.... Rodgers over cutler

 

Who doesn't know that?

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2010
Posts: 33652
Posted: #156

Da Bears!

Histrionic personality disorder. It's sad
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #157
Looks like Vegas and sportsbook got crushed on this game
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 473
Posted: #158
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:

The squares are on Packers! 
I think you mean the people with actual brains are on the Packers.

Anybody putting hard earned or stolen $$ on Jay Cutler and Lovie Smith in a GB game should be admitted to a mental institution and the key thrown away forever!!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5673
Posted: #159
omg the percentages didn't matter
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 2595
Posted: #160
Let this game be a lesson to conspiracy nuts everywhere lol.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 3165
Posted: #161
so what have we learned from this thread? that money or percentage dont mean squat.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 223
Posted: #162
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

 

Who doesn't know that?

apparently the big mouth know it all douchebags like lc and his mindless morons who treated his word like gospel and lost all their money and dont have the balls to come back to this thread
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #163
Quote Originally Posted by PapaGwop:

apparently the big mouth know it all douchebags like lc and his mindless morons who treated his word like gospel and lost all their money and dont have the balls to come back to this thread

 

 

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #164
Quote Originally Posted by PapaGwop:

apparently the big mouth know it all douchebags like lc and his mindless morons who treated his word like gospel and lost all their money and dont have the balls to come back to this thread

 

I don't know about that. The most I saw was people got their feelings hurt just because he picked the Bears. I believe he still has a winning day and I seriously doubt that you would be here had he won.

For the record, I had the Bears in two teasers but one with the G-Men so I didn't win any money with them but why act so almighty just because he lost 1 bet? He stated his reason and you don't have to agree with him.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 789
Posted: #165
This is hilarious, I didn't bet either side but I think you can throw percentages bet and any claims that books are "begging for money" out the window. 

It sounds like all confirmation bias to me.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 1627
Posted: #166
Oh glad I found this thread, this is the "sharp" bettor information I always hear about.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 679
Posted: #167
Quote Originally Posted by nittanycougar:

Oh glad I found this thread, this is the "sharp" bettor information I always hear about.


magnificent rack.

go pack

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 789
Posted: #168
If oddsmakers really are begging for money why do they stop at a certain point why not make it Packers +1.5 and get even more money?

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15765
Posted: #169
You guys are so funny. LC was right on his take of the game. DImes actually went to 2.5 before the game. Vegas was getting smart money all over the Bears.
Sharps do not always win though.....now there is an idea. 
Even the best are 60%
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1210
Posted: #170
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:

You guys are so funny. LC was right on his take of the game. DImes actually went to 2.5 before the game. Vegas was getting smart money all over the Bears.
Sharps do not always win though.....now there is an idea. 
Even the best are 60%

You are right about that Crashdavis565.  I had already posted Green Bay as a 5-Star Play on the Green Bay/Chicago Matchup Boards Saturday.

Then, saw the line dropping when I put my bet in on 5dimes.  Also posted Seattle as a 5-Star Play on the same post (listed a 6-Team Parlay).  Also, saw Seattle line fall before putting in my bet.

Doesn't work all the time, but I've noticed a "trick" that can work.  When a favorite's line begins to drop from say 4.5, to 4, then 3.5, I've noticed that many of these favorites do in fact win, like Green Bay and Seattle. 

BOL with all of your wagers Crashdavis565  

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1210
Posted: #171

Quote Originally Posted by BABYFACE024:

looks like its not all just a set up. . too  many conspiracy nuts on here betting terrible teams on a public fade only because they think its rigged. . .   pack rollin pay the "squares"

Excellent BABYFACE024!  Well said, and closes this case!

BOL with all of your wagers  

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2297
Posted: #172
i had GB and i feel extremely lucky they were able to cover. That last shot down the field where GB should have called for PI would have set the bears up for a backdoor. was it fixed for the pack to cover? why would it be? the public was on GB.

just goes to show that people will believe what they want to believe. a lot of people come out and start puffing their chests about everything AFTER the game is over. just saying, you guys would be a lot more credible if you start talking shiet BEFORE it actually happens.
 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 18584
Posted: #173
Pack dominated most of the game yet Bears still had a chance to cover late had it not been for a few questionable calls by the stripes.  Lost on bears straight for 2 units but cashed a teaser for 1unit on bears, steelers, niners.  All in all I still dont think the Pack are that great this year.  Everything could change in a few weeks when the playoffs start.
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.