All Forums | NFL Betting

Record Numbers Coming in on Green Bay

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 27765
Posts: 173
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 85
Posted: #101
My book had it at Pack -3 even last night and woke up to find it at -2.5 -110.  Nothing new injury wise that I can see.  IF all the money has come in squarely on the Pack....this line move makes zero sense.  Maybe a heavy hitter came in and pounded the bears, but I'd like to remind all of you of something:

"Sharp" picks are NOT always right.  "Square" picks are not always wrong.  The true definition of the "Sharp" pick is the one that wins, and the "Square" is the one who loses....because he in fact makes a dumb bet.

As a lifelong packers fan, I have 500 on the Pack -3 at even money.  I'm not sweating it regardless of the line moves
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 828
Posted: #102
Spread means nothing in this rivlalry outside its gonna be a close game....Game means more for this team bs bs bs bs...neither team has locked anything up...

Better QB?
More Turnovers?
Healthier team?

answer those 3 and make your play....its simple BOL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 34800
Posted: #103
The Green Bay side have more "big bets" coming in.

Whether that is the "sharp" or not is to be determined.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2002
Posts: 4128
Posted: #104
To me, it looks like a head fake. Linesmakers are putting on airs that there is money coming in on the bears based on information that is unknown to us the public. We second guess ourselves and next thing u know the bears have some money on them.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2010
Posts: 936
Posted: #105
BOL LC it's oblivious the kids on this site are a bunch of immature drunkards
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 3
Posted: #106
I said it the other day GB looked like a gift at 3 and we all know theres no such thing as a gift in sports betting!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 2466
Posted: #107

Quote Originally Posted by dustyvaultz:

BOL LC it's oblivious the kids on this site are a bunch of immature drunkards

1st of all...its OBVIOUS not oblivious. 2nd: who u callin kids?? is that you in your avatar picture? only high schoolers put up that kind of picture of themselves...YOU THINK U GROWN? your cheek skin look softer than my buttcheeks ...if that AINT you..then i gotta ask: why you got a picture of another dude on ur avatar..dont come out the closet young blood..you got ur whole life ahead of you

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1684
Posted: #108
all these "public" road faves remind me of week 13.  home dogs ended up going 4-2 (ATS):

SF (-7)          76%    @ Stl       13-16 (W)

Car (-3)         75%    @ KC       21-27 (W)

NE (-8)         77%    @ Mia       23-16 (W)

Hou (-6)        84%    @ Ten      24-10 (L)

Cin (-1.5)      70%    @ SD       20-13 (L)

NYG (-2.5)   74%    @ Was     16-17 (W)


I know, what does week 13 have to do with this week.  Just a trend sorta thing.  I wonder what the trend is for the season, say +70% "public" road faves..

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1182
Posted: #109
I see that the line on sportsbook has dropped to GB - 2 1/2
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 1684
Posted: #110
posted this somewhere else, but it's what's keeping me off the Bears so far..

They have not beat quality teams this year.  The three wins they have vs teams with winning records are:

Ind, 9-4 (week 1)

Dal, 7-6 (week 4)

Min, 7-6 (week 12)

All other wins are vs teams with losing records.  That first team was with a rookie on the road in his first game, and those other two teams are of questionable quality.

They simply have not had a big quality win, and they've had their chances, @ GB, vs Hou, @ SF, @ Sea.

Bears $$ is "there's a first time for everything" $$.. ie, they'll have to play better than they've played all season.. Not convinced it's worth the gamble.. Just sayin'..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 5
Posted: #111
can anyone explain WHY the line has moved down for CHI when almost all of the $ is coming in on the pack?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 33
Posted: #112
I think people who cap seriously realize that the trends favor the Packers. 

That's why this thread was made...because line moves have to do with how the money is pouring in. There are always a ton of factors to consider when placing a bet. And this is one of them. 

This info is interesting and may or may not change my play. But to me, having more info is always better. 

I think the Under is the best play in this game, and have teased the pack to +3. I may put alil on da Bears come gametime if that line jumps back up. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 3476
Posted: #113
Quote Originally Posted by OneBloodyBoto:

Where do you get your information?  Just wondering as I have never been able to find dollar amounts anywhere, just % of bettors.  Unless this is a local book that you have access to.



He won't answer for one of a few reasons:

1)  He's not here to share any info and contribute to the forum.
2)  Those numbers are made up.
3)  He's a beat off.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 33
Posted: #114
Dude...yall need to read the thread before getting butthurt. 

It has been stated MULTIPLE times where he got the numbers. Why are there so many haterz on here?
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 6677
Posted: #115
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:

Keyser, Theone, Gilmo and all others......

You people are pretty pathetic and have serious issues if someone on a degenerate sports gambling website can upset you that much

You can throw out whatever insults and tough guy words you want with a keybaord.  They mean nothing.  It only proves how big of a lowlife you are.

This is a sports forum.  If Im a homer, dont click my threads, dont read other threads that involve the Packers.  Get over it. 

You are all lowlifes.  You think insulting me and bumping old threads means something.  I could care less. 

Everybody losses bets. 

If the Packers lose, the Packers lose.  Thats life.

If you truly think the Bears are a better team and will win this game so be it. 

Amazing how pathetic your lives are that you could get so angry with someone on a sports forum.

Nice lives you live

More important things in life to worry about and get upset over, then someone "homer views" of the Packers

 

You sure TALK a good game. Who's the one upset enough to challege someone else to a fight OVER THE INTERNET?

Throwing insults? Whos' the one that said people on Bears simply don't know ANYTHING ABOUT FOOTBALL and now all of a sudden, so be it? Hell, the thread wasn't even to debate which team is better. You want to sound all reasonable now? How about stop being a hypocrite FIRST?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 948
Posted: #116
Isn't it just the people who have bet the Packers who are spooked? Too funny.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 853
Posted: #117
That was the first reasonable comment letsgopack has ever made
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 9317
Posted: #118
Quote Originally Posted by thawv:



He won't answer for one of a few reasons:

1)  He's not here to share any info and contribute to the forum.
2)  Those numbers are made up.
3)  He's a beat off.



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2003
Posts: 3476
Posted: #119
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:







 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 12197
Posted: #120
Jordy Nelson is out and so is Charles Woodson for the Packers.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 828
Posted: #121
Woodson may not play again this yr for the pack....better without him
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 184
Posted: #122
Well in Vegas the line is going down to 2.5 and even down to -2 now......
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 253
Posted: #123
christ, never thought I would have to lock this in at 2.5.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2011
Posts: 12243
Posted: #124
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:

 

You sure TALK a good game. Who's the one upset enough to challege someone else to a fight OVER THE INTERNET?

Throwing insults? Whos' the one that said people on Bears simply don't know ANYTHING ABOUT FOOTBALL and now all of a sudden, so be it? Hell, the thread wasn't even to debate which team is better. You want to sound all reasonable now? How about stop being a hypocrite FIRST?

 

 

Ready went over this multiple times.  Yes, I lost my cool ONE time 11 months ago after a playoff loss.  So what???>  Havent come close to acting that way since.

 

As for insults....thats not a personal insult or attack.  This is a sports forum.  If I say someone betting on the opposite side doesnt know what they are talking about, I dont consider that an insult.

People on here attack my threads calling me a douche, ahole, pos, bla bla bla....

I kind of see a big difference.

 

If the Pack go out and get killed in this game, come back and tell me I dont know anything about football.  Thats fine, I can understand that.  To go out calling someone a douchebag, ahole bla bla bla all cause you dislike their comments is BEYOND OUT OF LINE

 

Maybe I cross the line and am sarcastic and "mock" your bets, but besides the ONE TIME I lost my cool 11 MONTHS ago, I never made personal insults.  

Thats whats wrong with the world.  You people just throw out inslults thinking nothing of it.

Im an adult, I can handle it.  But, people wonder why the world is so messed up.  People dont even think of what they say to who they say it to. 

 

You want to insult my comments, or insults my bets, have at it.  As a person, leave me alone.  This site has nothing to do with any of that.

 

I dont make comments on people ive never met.  Especially over comments I read them make.  What a joke.

 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 4485
Posted: #125
just looked at the live odds page here on Covers and Pinnacle has it at +1
Gotta go pee!
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.