LC, I don't care how good you are, but ban yourself . Doesn't matter the source, but if you think there is less than a million on the pack and those numbers represents the total amount wagered on the game than you're a fool.
People are being retarded in this thread. They won't even check on the information lol. Those are numbers from one book...
0
Quote Originally Posted by rr207:
LC, I don't care how good you are, but ban yourself . Doesn't matter the source, but if you think there is less than a million on the pack and those numbers represents the total amount wagered on the game than you're a fool.
People are being retarded in this thread. They won't even check on the information lol. Those are numbers from one book...
While the number might not be the true indicator, it's safe to assume the people(in this case, money, too) on GB will outnumber those the Bears by a good margin. This post isn't about which is the better team....
0
While the number might not be the true indicator, it's safe to assume the people(in this case, money, too) on GB will outnumber those the Bears by a good margin. This post isn't about which is the better team....
While the number might not be the true indicator, it's safe to assume the people(in this case, money, too) on GB will outnumber those the Bears by a good margin. This post isn't about which is the better team....
i suppose the whole point of this thread was to give some people another reality check - bookies are not in the business of giving money away (contrary to what said people believe).
also, bookies are usually better than most people when it comes to forecasting (at least they know how to balance their books). And if there is a one-sided action and no line adjustment, it would be logical to assume the public is wrong.
and that not even including the fact that packers blow -)
0
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:
While the number might not be the true indicator, it's safe to assume the people(in this case, money, too) on GB will outnumber those the Bears by a good margin. This post isn't about which is the better team....
i suppose the whole point of this thread was to give some people another reality check - bookies are not in the business of giving money away (contrary to what said people believe).
also, bookies are usually better than most people when it comes to forecasting (at least they know how to balance their books). And if there is a one-sided action and no line adjustment, it would be logical to assume the public is wrong.
and that not even including the fact that packers blow -)
People who dont understand football are on Chicago
Been saying it since they were 7-1, Chicago WILL NOT make the playoffs Season ends tomorrow
As opposed to the Packers - who will see their season end after their first playoff game. Just like last year. Packers are a fraud and will be owned in the playoffs. AGAIN. Start working on your excuses...
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
People who dont understand football are on Chicago
Been saying it since they were 7-1, Chicago WILL NOT make the playoffs Season ends tomorrow
As opposed to the Packers - who will see their season end after their first playoff game. Just like last year. Packers are a fraud and will be owned in the playoffs. AGAIN. Start working on your excuses...
wait so if the line is going down on GB..doesn't it mean that theres more money on Chicago and that books moved the line down so they can attract more GB bettors?????????? don't they do this to even out the action on the game? if they are simply doing this just to BEG for more gb action...then this game must be fixed because gb owns chicago all day
0
wait so if the line is going down on GB..doesn't it mean that theres more money on Chicago and that books moved the line down so they can attract more GB bettors?????????? don't they do this to even out the action on the game? if they are simply doing this just to BEG for more gb action...then this game must be fixed because gb owns chicago all day
People who dont understand football are on Chicago
Been saying it since they were 7-1, Chicago WILL NOT make the playoffs Season ends tomorrow
After Bears spank the Pack tmrw will you stfu for once. You are the most irritating homer on this site. Even when the Pack lose you have some lame duck excuse. Your team is not that good. Face the facts you maggot.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
People who dont understand football are on Chicago
Been saying it since they were 7-1, Chicago WILL NOT make the playoffs Season ends tomorrow
After Bears spank the Pack tmrw will you stfu for once. You are the most irritating homer on this site. Even when the Pack lose you have some lame duck excuse. Your team is not that good. Face the facts you maggot.
In 9 career games against the Bears, Aaron Rodgers has a 101.0 QB rating with 16 TD's and 6 INT's. Rodgers is 7-2 against the Bears.
In 7 career games against the Packers, Jay Cutler has a 60.5 QB rating with 8 TD's and 15 INT's. Cutler is 1-6 against the Packers.
The Packers O-Line have allowed Rodgers to be sacked 42 times and be hit 71 times.
The Bears O-Line have allowed Cutler to be sacked 37 times and be hit 75 times.
finally some facts...why is everyone on the bears anyway? seriously tho...WHY? is this another situational game? i have yet to see anyone state ONE good reason why they think bears will win this game...everybody just babblin right now. im actually expecting cutler to get hurt again somehow tomo
0
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:
Some facts:
In 9 career games against the Bears, Aaron Rodgers has a 101.0 QB rating with 16 TD's and 6 INT's. Rodgers is 7-2 against the Bears.
In 7 career games against the Packers, Jay Cutler has a 60.5 QB rating with 8 TD's and 15 INT's. Cutler is 1-6 against the Packers.
The Packers O-Line have allowed Rodgers to be sacked 42 times and be hit 71 times.
The Bears O-Line have allowed Cutler to be sacked 37 times and be hit 75 times.
finally some facts...why is everyone on the bears anyway? seriously tho...WHY? is this another situational game? i have yet to see anyone state ONE good reason why they think bears will win this game...everybody just babblin right now. im actually expecting cutler to get hurt again somehow tomo
finally some facts...why is everyone on the bears anyway? seriously tho...WHY? is this another situational game? i have yet to see anyone state ONE good reason why they think bears will win this game...everybody just babblin right now. im actually expecting cutler to get hurt again somehow tomo
People are on the Bears because.....
The line hasnt moved, or is dropping
They claim this is only a must-win for Chicago
Nothing to do with Cutler being 1-6 against GB, nothing to do with if GB loses this game they can drop from #3 to #6, nothing to do with Chicago will be the 2nd team in NFL history to start 7-1 and miss the playoffs,
0
Quote Originally Posted by usikbasterd:
finally some facts...why is everyone on the bears anyway? seriously tho...WHY? is this another situational game? i have yet to see anyone state ONE good reason why they think bears will win this game...everybody just babblin right now. im actually expecting cutler to get hurt again somehow tomo
People are on the Bears because.....
The line hasnt moved, or is dropping
They claim this is only a must-win for Chicago
Nothing to do with Cutler being 1-6 against GB, nothing to do with if GB loses this game they can drop from #3 to #6, nothing to do with Chicago will be the 2nd team in NFL history to start 7-1 and miss the playoffs,
...forreal what the f*ck u guys fightin about anyways..
They are mad im a homer. They are mad I refuse to admit GB didnt lay an egg LAST YEAR in the playoffs against NY and admit NY beat them. They bump my threads from 11 months ago
They are mad that when the Bears were 7-1, I made a thread that GB would win the division, Bears wouldnt make the playoffs and wouldnt get 10 wins
They have sad lives They have serious issues They need to understand there are much more important things in life than someones bias opinions on covers.com
0
Quote Originally Posted by usikbasterd:
...forreal what the f*ck u guys fightin about anyways..
They are mad im a homer. They are mad I refuse to admit GB didnt lay an egg LAST YEAR in the playoffs against NY and admit NY beat them. They bump my threads from 11 months ago
They are mad that when the Bears were 7-1, I made a thread that GB would win the division, Bears wouldnt make the playoffs and wouldnt get 10 wins
They have sad lives They have serious issues They need to understand there are much more important things in life than someones bias opinions on covers.com
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
. Doesn't matter the source, but if you think there is less than a million on the pack and those numbers represents the total amount wagered on the game than you're a fool. 
Season ends tomorrow 
...forreal what the f*ck u guys fightin about anyways..
Hot Forum Topics
