14-6 NFL YTD broncos+7 u/41 lions+4.5 ravens+4.5 bengals+6.5 speculations with no math backing and not wagered yet: sea -4.5 u/45 buccaneers u/48 browns +3.5 tail or fade... gl
ADDING:
Hou+3
NYG+5.5 *I've slightly more $ on this one
Seahawks u/44
---
Late game lean:
Browns now at +4 *It was at +3.5, so I might wait to see if line goes up more*
14-6 NFL YTD with today pending. Let's see if my math wins today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Reginald_K32:
14-6 NFL YTD broncos+7 u/41 lions+4.5 ravens+4.5 bengals+6.5 speculations with no math backing and not wagered yet: sea -4.5 u/45 buccaneers u/48 browns +3.5 tail or fade... gl
ADDING:
Hou+3
NYG+5.5 *I've slightly more $ on this one
Seahawks u/44
---
Late game lean:
Browns now at +4 *It was at +3.5, so I might wait to see if line goes up more*
14-6 NFL YTD with today pending. Let's see if my math wins today.
But I got the Ws on the bigger wagers of Lions and Giants. Reading the forums during games are hilarious. There's 2 more quarters to play after half time. Teams do make adjustments (Giants).
Pending:
Managed to get the Browns+5 tonight and even flirted with the ML.
GL all!
0
18-10 NFL YTD
4-4 today...
But I got the Ws on the bigger wagers of Lions and Giants. Reading the forums during games are hilarious. There's 2 more quarters to play after half time. Teams do make adjustments (Giants).
Pending:
Managed to get the Browns+5 tonight and even flirted with the ML.
18-11 NFL YTD (62%) I've the Redskins covering 5.5 points about 57% of the time. I have them winning in this spot around 31%. This means the play is... Redskins+5.5 @-110 Tail or fade...GL
That is what I was thinking - Dog or NO bet .... I took the NO bet
1
Quote Originally Posted by Reginald_K32:
18-11 NFL YTD (62%) I've the Redskins covering 5.5 points about 57% of the time. I have them winning in this spot around 31%. This means the play is... Redskins+5.5 @-110 Tail or fade...GL
That is what I was thinking - Dog or NO bet .... I took the NO bet
18-11 NFL YTD (62%) I've the Redskins covering 5.5 points about 57% of the time. I have them winning in this spot around 31%. This means the play is... Redskins+5.5 @-110 Tail or fade...GL
That is what I was thinking - Dog or NO bet .... I took the NO bet
I understand, stressfreelife, and GL on your season!
I've been developing a predictive model and testing it out. When my math has the Redskins covering 57% of the time, it means I've the right odds to bet this until it goes from -110 to -132 (56.9% implied probability). Sure, there are variables in the model that might not be properly defined, but this can be refined through time. Sometimes, it comes down to bad luck (Brees injury) and very questionable play calls (Browns on the goal line last night & some flags).
0
Quote Originally Posted by stressfreelife:
Quote Originally Posted by Reginald_K32:
18-11 NFL YTD (62%) I've the Redskins covering 5.5 points about 57% of the time. I have them winning in this spot around 31%. This means the play is... Redskins+5.5 @-110 Tail or fade...GL
That is what I was thinking - Dog or NO bet .... I took the NO bet
I understand, stressfreelife, and GL on your season!
I've been developing a predictive model and testing it out. When my math has the Redskins covering 57% of the time, it means I've the right odds to bet this until it goes from -110 to -132 (56.9% implied probability). Sure, there are variables in the model that might not be properly defined, but this can be refined through time. Sometimes, it comes down to bad luck (Brees injury) and very questionable play calls (Browns on the goal line last night & some flags).
18-11 NFL YTD (62%) I've the Redskins covering 5.5 points about 57% of the time. I have them winning in this spot around 31%. This means the play is... Redskins+5.5 @-110 Tail or fade...GL
That is what I was thinking - Dog or NO bet .... I took the NO bet
I understand, stressfreelife, and GL on your season! I've been developing a predictive model and testing it out. When my math has the Redskins covering 57% of the time, it means I've the right odds to bet this until it goes from -110 to -132 (56.9% implied probability). Sure, there are variables in the model that might not be properly defined, but this can be refined through time. Sometimes, it comes down to bad luck (Brees injury) and very questionable play calls (Browns on the goal line last night & some flags).
Yah, I just felt it was a bad spot for a bet ....Still too many unknowns about both those teams which is why I shied away. GL rest of the season.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Reginald_K32:
Quote Originally Posted by stressfreelife:
Quote Originally Posted by Reginald_K32:
18-11 NFL YTD (62%) I've the Redskins covering 5.5 points about 57% of the time. I have them winning in this spot around 31%. This means the play is... Redskins+5.5 @-110 Tail or fade...GL
That is what I was thinking - Dog or NO bet .... I took the NO bet
I understand, stressfreelife, and GL on your season! I've been developing a predictive model and testing it out. When my math has the Redskins covering 57% of the time, it means I've the right odds to bet this until it goes from -110 to -132 (56.9% implied probability). Sure, there are variables in the model that might not be properly defined, but this can be refined through time. Sometimes, it comes down to bad luck (Brees injury) and very questionable play calls (Browns on the goal line last night & some flags).
Yah, I just felt it was a bad spot for a bet ....Still too many unknowns about both those teams which is why I shied away. GL rest of the season.
RAN SOME NUMBERS THIS MORNING, AND I'M ON THE FOLLOWING EARLY GAMES:
WASH+3.5 (MED/BIG BET SIZE)
WASH O/49 (SMALLER)
CLE+7 (BIGGER)
CLE U/46 (BIGGER)
NOTE:
I've read a lot of love on several forums/threads on the Bills+7 and Lions+7. I didn't like the odds on the Bills+7, based solely off historical analysis. I did not have much time to run predictive studies for this game, so I did not touch it. Furthermore, the Lions are banged up in a couple of key positions- Slay is out and Stafford has hip pain. Therefore, these variables downgraded the Lions' probability of covering 7, and I decided to stay away.
Tail or fade... GL!
0
20-12 NFL YTD
RAN SOME NUMBERS THIS MORNING, AND I'M ON THE FOLLOWING EARLY GAMES:
WASH+3.5 (MED/BIG BET SIZE)
WASH O/49 (SMALLER)
CLE+7 (BIGGER)
CLE U/46 (BIGGER)
NOTE:
I've read a lot of love on several forums/threads on the Bills+7 and Lions+7. I didn't like the odds on the Bills+7, based solely off historical analysis. I did not have much time to run predictive studies for this game, so I did not touch it. Furthermore, the Lions are banged up in a couple of key positions- Slay is out and Stafford has hip pain. Therefore, these variables downgraded the Lions' probability of covering 7, and I decided to stay away.
Slay is out and Stafford has hip pain. Therefore, these variables downgraded the Lions' probability of covering 7, and I decided to stay away. Tail or fade... GL!
Exactly why I laid off the game, but it would NOT surprise me if Detroit wins straight up -- If they can run the ball and control time of possession they will at least cover and may upset .... and they will be able to run on KC
1
Quote Originally Posted by Reginald_K32:
Slay is out and Stafford has hip pain. Therefore, these variables downgraded the Lions' probability of covering 7, and I decided to stay away. Tail or fade... GL!
Exactly why I laid off the game, but it would NOT surprise me if Detroit wins straight up -- If they can run the ball and control time of possession they will at least cover and may upset .... and they will be able to run on KC
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.