we have 3 regression methods, close wins, expected wins and year over year improvement. We back the top 2 largest mismatchs in each method. That gives us 6 plays, if a tie occurs we have more then 6. Expected Wins ....... Packers by 2.8 over Eagles Vikes by 2.5 over Giants Boys by 2.5 over Browns, we have a tie for 2cd Close Wins .......... Falcons by 9 over Steelers Chargers by 5 over Raiders Pats by 5 over Bengals, another tie for 2cd Wins Improvement............. Chargers by 7 over Raiders Panthers by 7 over Saints 2 ties give us 8 plays, if a team qualifies in the top 2 in 2 methods we make 2 plays on them. Chargers are the only team with 2 plays, 1 play on each of the other 7 teams.
,...........GOOD STUFF
1
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
we have 3 regression methods, close wins, expected wins and year over year improvement. We back the top 2 largest mismatchs in each method. That gives us 6 plays, if a tie occurs we have more then 6. Expected Wins ....... Packers by 2.8 over Eagles Vikes by 2.5 over Giants Boys by 2.5 over Browns, we have a tie for 2cd Close Wins .......... Falcons by 9 over Steelers Chargers by 5 over Raiders Pats by 5 over Bengals, another tie for 2cd Wins Improvement............. Chargers by 7 over Raiders Panthers by 7 over Saints 2 ties give us 8 plays, if a team qualifies in the top 2 in 2 methods we make 2 plays on them. Chargers are the only team with 2 plays, 1 play on each of the other 7 teams.
The other 2 games I'll wait out the line try to get +3.
Thankfully I got -3 with Falcons and Chargers but could of had Vikes pk and Panthers +5.
Pats I easily had +9.5 and would of bought it up to +10 as eerily crazy how many times I lost by 10 in the games I did lose ATS when you have a bad team VS a good team. I learned my lesson on this over the years.
I did buy it to +9, I could expect less seeing how I should of had 10. Lose by 10 will be a killer.
1
Falcons -3 (-120) over Steelers --- 1.1 units
Chargers -3 over Raiders --- 2.2 units (2 plays)
Panthers +4 over Saints --- 1.1 unit
Vikes -1.5 over Giants - 1.1 units
Pats +9 (-120) over Bengals --- 1.1 units
The other 2 games I'll wait out the line try to get +3.
Thankfully I got -3 with Falcons and Chargers but could of had Vikes pk and Panthers +5.
Pats I easily had +9.5 and would of bought it up to +10 as eerily crazy how many times I lost by 10 in the games I did lose ATS when you have a bad team VS a good team. I learned my lesson on this over the years.
I did buy it to +9, I could expect less seeing how I should of had 10. Lose by 10 will be a killer.
@theclaw Love the Chargers. Additionally, Harbaugh is undefeated in home openers as a head coach (NFL or college)
Wow, that's pretty impressive. Chargers had 8 close losses, not likely repeatable to get that many again and with Harbaugh you know better coaching and more discipline is coming.
0
Quote Originally Posted by monkeebooger:
@theclaw Love the Chargers. Additionally, Harbaugh is undefeated in home openers as a head coach (NFL or college)
Wow, that's pretty impressive. Chargers had 8 close losses, not likely repeatable to get that many again and with Harbaugh you know better coaching and more discipline is coming.
when a team reaches a certain level of dominance in a method the probabilities go up quite a bit to Win ATS.
Only 1team has done that, Falcons.
Steelers have 9 close wins out of their 10 wins last season and only 2 close loses out of their 7 losses last year.
This team does not have the QB or offense to win very big, so how will they get 9 close wins again is so unlikely, they could drop 4-6 wins right there. If not more.
0
when a team reaches a certain level of dominance in a method the probabilities go up quite a bit to Win ATS.
Only 1team has done that, Falcons.
Steelers have 9 close wins out of their 10 wins last season and only 2 close loses out of their 7 losses last year.
This team does not have the QB or offense to win very big, so how will they get 9 close wins again is so unlikely, they could drop 4-6 wins right there. If not more.
Alot of love for the Texans out there. Understandable for sure with what looks like a great QB and an improved overall team.
They had 7 close wins, 3rd most last season.
Colts do have 6 so not much difference there. Good cappers are loving the Colts though.
Interesting trend ..............
7 teams made the jump from +15000 to under +2000 the next season. 2 won 1 playoff game each, 1 team did make championship game. No team made the SB. The remaining 5 teams all finished below .500.
Making these big leaps may not be the holy grail, with 7 close wins helps explain some of this big leap by the Texans.
They might very well be better but finish with a worse record.
0
Alot of love for the Texans out there. Understandable for sure with what looks like a great QB and an improved overall team.
They had 7 close wins, 3rd most last season.
Colts do have 6 so not much difference there. Good cappers are loving the Colts though.
Interesting trend ..............
7 teams made the jump from +15000 to under +2000 the next season. 2 won 1 playoff game each, 1 team did make championship game. No team made the SB. The remaining 5 teams all finished below .500.
Making these big leaps may not be the holy grail, with 7 close wins helps explain some of this big leap by the Texans.
They might very well be better but finish with a worse record.
Road dogs that didn't make the playoffs last season in week 1 hit at 60% going back many years. Another trend I saw online.
Interesting, and there are nine this year. Five ATS wins is 55%, six ATS wins is 66%. You have to choose well even when playing a trend in this league.
0
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Road dogs that didn't make the playoffs last season in week 1 hit at 60% going back many years. Another trend I saw online.
Interesting, and there are nine this year. Five ATS wins is 55%, six ATS wins is 66%. You have to choose well even when playing a trend in this league.
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Road dogs that didn't make the playoffs last season in week 1 hit at 60% going back many years. Another trend I saw online. Interesting, and there are nine this year. Five ATS wins is 55%, six ATS wins is 66%. You have to choose well even when playing a trend in this league.
........Yes, trends are another tool. They can support or contradict other info you might be using........
0
Quote Originally Posted by garbagetime:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Road dogs that didn't make the playoffs last season in week 1 hit at 60% going back many years. Another trend I saw online. Interesting, and there are nine this year. Five ATS wins is 55%, six ATS wins is 66%. You have to choose well even when playing a trend in this league.
........Yes, trends are another tool. They can support or contradict other info you might be using........
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Road dogs that didn't make the playoffs last season in week 1 hit at 60% going back many years. Another trend I saw online. That's interesting and I'll buy that one.
......... I just saw this, non playoff team VS playoff team.
Week 1 playing div opp 35-13 ATS for non playoff team
Home fav .... 13-5-1 ATS
Away dog .... 29-18
2 best spots
0
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: Road dogs that didn't make the playoffs last season in week 1 hit at 60% going back many years. Another trend I saw online. That's interesting and I'll buy that one.
......... I just saw this, non playoff team VS playoff team.
Week 1 playing div opp 35-13 ATS for non playoff team
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.