Hey bud...you're a reasonable voice...whoa there...
Rodgers sat BEHIND Favre...but he ain't SITTING BEHIND anybody now...what are you saying "full circle"??? Like he should be good with Jordan Love (Honorable Mention Mountain West in 2019???) backing him up?
Rodgers WANTS THE PACK TO WIN...but they've taken ONE OFFENSIVE PLAYER IN THE 10 YEARS SINCE HE WON THE SUPE...
and that one offensive player was JORDAN LOVE...you can't make the shit up...GREEN BAY leadership's collective brain is coagulated with sharp Wisconsin cheddar.
3
@vetdrm
Hey bud...you're a reasonable voice...whoa there...
Rodgers sat BEHIND Favre...but he ain't SITTING BEHIND anybody now...what are you saying "full circle"??? Like he should be good with Jordan Love (Honorable Mention Mountain West in 2019???) backing him up?
Rodgers WANTS THE PACK TO WIN...but they've taken ONE OFFENSIVE PLAYER IN THE 10 YEARS SINCE HE WON THE SUPE...
and that one offensive player was JORDAN LOVE...you can't make the shit up...GREEN BAY leadership's collective brain is coagulated with sharp Wisconsin cheddar.
Are quarterbacks players or management? Rodgers is upset for the following reasons: he doesn't like anyone in the front office, he doesn't like the players in the skill positions, he didn't like it when the Packers drafted a QB...and he is paid like a maharajah and makes tens of millions from commercial endorsements.
This guy is selfish and self centered and I don't think he has a leg to stand on there...He is 39 so for a team to have an heir apparent brought in last year is no surprise to anyone but him.
Skill position players come and go so it is his job to make the most of it no matter who he has to run or catch the ball. We all work with people we don't like but we all plow ahead and make the most of it...Rodgers is a spoiled futch who has become like many other players in the NFL...instead of being grateful and thankful for what he has gained from being a pro player, he is only focusing on the negatives...no sympathy from me, only scorn.
0
Are quarterbacks players or management? Rodgers is upset for the following reasons: he doesn't like anyone in the front office, he doesn't like the players in the skill positions, he didn't like it when the Packers drafted a QB...and he is paid like a maharajah and makes tens of millions from commercial endorsements.
This guy is selfish and self centered and I don't think he has a leg to stand on there...He is 39 so for a team to have an heir apparent brought in last year is no surprise to anyone but him.
Skill position players come and go so it is his job to make the most of it no matter who he has to run or catch the ball. We all work with people we don't like but we all plow ahead and make the most of it...Rodgers is a spoiled futch who has become like many other players in the NFL...instead of being grateful and thankful for what he has gained from being a pro player, he is only focusing on the negatives...no sympathy from me, only scorn.
@DB51daBEARS You know what. let him go. Packers have a knack for getting good players. Well see how love performs if he ever gets the chance. I know pack didn't do him any favors although they did honor his request firing Mike McCarthy. Gotta say,his timing was perfect.
I'm gonna have to disagree. I think that has been the problem.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by vetdrm:
@DB51daBEARS You know what. let him go. Packers have a knack for getting good players. Well see how love performs if he ever gets the chance. I know pack didn't do him any favors although they did honor his request firing Mike McCarthy. Gotta say,his timing was perfect.
I'm gonna have to disagree. I think that has been the problem.
Favre and Rodgers made all their mediocre offensive rosters look a lot better than they really were/are.
Remember a receiver named Janis? One year the broadcasters wanted to hype that guy into the next Edelman...it was all the brilliance of Rodgers, and Favre before...gotta mention Reggie White though
Victory Belongs to the Most Tenacious
1
@vetdrm
Favre and Rodgers made all their mediocre offensive rosters look a lot better than they really were/are.
Remember a receiver named Janis? One year the broadcasters wanted to hype that guy into the next Edelman...it was all the brilliance of Rodgers, and Favre before...gotta mention Reggie White though
@StumpTownStu I guess last years 13-3 record was a mirage. And I guess the 20 years prior to that also.
Yes, it was. A weak NFC North. A weak NFC period plus one of the greatest QBs of all times. And with said QB, how many SBs have they won in the last 20 years? Exactly. Besides, you said they have a way of just getting good players. They really have not. In the past 20 years there's only a handful of guys you could really call good. They have done well with personnel. This is not my opinion, it's a general consensus.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by vetdrm:
@StumpTownStu I guess last years 13-3 record was a mirage. And I guess the 20 years prior to that also.
Yes, it was. A weak NFC North. A weak NFC period plus one of the greatest QBs of all times. And with said QB, how many SBs have they won in the last 20 years? Exactly. Besides, you said they have a way of just getting good players. They really have not. In the past 20 years there's only a handful of guys you could really call good. They have done well with personnel. This is not my opinion, it's a general consensus.
As a Packers fan every year I take Rodgers back and always fall for him even if the season really was at his fault. Last year after the Bucs game was the first year where I really looked in the mirror and thought, "What if this is the James Harden story? Keep running back a good team with different pieces each year but its never ever good enough" And I honestly think I am not only right but I am spot on. That being said, maybe it really is time for Rodgers and the Pack to separate.
0
As a Packers fan every year I take Rodgers back and always fall for him even if the season really was at his fault. Last year after the Bucs game was the first year where I really looked in the mirror and thought, "What if this is the James Harden story? Keep running back a good team with different pieces each year but its never ever good enough" And I honestly think I am not only right but I am spot on. That being said, maybe it really is time for Rodgers and the Pack to separate.
Quote Originally Posted by vetdrm: @StumpTownStu I guess last years 13-3 record was a mirage. And I guess the 20 years prior to that also. Yes, it was. A weak NFC North. A weak NFC period plus one of the greatest QBs of all times. And with said QB, how many SBs have they won in the last 20 years? Exactly. Besides, you said they have a way of just getting good players. They really have not. In the past 20 years there's only a handful of guys you could really call good. They have done well with personnel. This is not my opinion, it's a general consensus.
GB actually has one of the more complete rosters in the NFL. Top tier RB, top tier WR, best LT in the game, solid pass rush, solid DT and one of the best CB in the game. Not to mention two great safeties who played great last year. The team is for sure legit
0
Quote Originally Posted by StumpTownStu:
Quote Originally Posted by vetdrm: @StumpTownStu I guess last years 13-3 record was a mirage. And I guess the 20 years prior to that also. Yes, it was. A weak NFC North. A weak NFC period plus one of the greatest QBs of all times. And with said QB, how many SBs have they won in the last 20 years? Exactly. Besides, you said they have a way of just getting good players. They really have not. In the past 20 years there's only a handful of guys you could really call good. They have done well with personnel. This is not my opinion, it's a general consensus.
GB actually has one of the more complete rosters in the NFL. Top tier RB, top tier WR, best LT in the game, solid pass rush, solid DT and one of the best CB in the game. Not to mention two great safeties who played great last year. The team is for sure legit
Last 10 first round picks, 9 Defensive and QB last year, who doesn’t seem close to being backup. You are right he selfish.
I actually like Jaire, Savage, and Kenny Clark but typically this team has not drafted well in the last couple decades. Even ARod kinda fell in their laps. This place hasn't been a free agent destination. It's Green Bay. How many big free agent signings have they had since Reggie White? I know vet took it personally but I wasn't trashing his team. Just saying that I disagree with the assertion that they have a way of just landing good players. Now if he would've said they just have a way of landing HOF QBs I wouldn't have had a word to say.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76:
Last 10 first round picks, 9 Defensive and QB last year, who doesn’t seem close to being backup. You are right he selfish.
I actually like Jaire, Savage, and Kenny Clark but typically this team has not drafted well in the last couple decades. Even ARod kinda fell in their laps. This place hasn't been a free agent destination. It's Green Bay. How many big free agent signings have they had since Reggie White? I know vet took it personally but I wasn't trashing his team. Just saying that I disagree with the assertion that they have a way of just landing good players. Now if he would've said they just have a way of landing HOF QBs I wouldn't have had a word to say.
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Ask yourself what the Pack could have used more last year, an offensive weapon, or a back up qb. Neither, as they led the NFL in offense....they could have used a #2 corner and a Dline pass rusher.... Love was a great pick, dont think they had to trade up to get him, but he has all the tools that Rodgers does plus can run...
Correct you are on their needs, which i think they would have been better served if they had addressed them instead of Love at that time.
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Ask yourself what the Pack could have used more last year, an offensive weapon, or a back up qb. Neither, as they led the NFL in offense....they could have used a #2 corner and a Dline pass rusher.... Love was a great pick, dont think they had to trade up to get him, but he has all the tools that Rodgers does plus can run...
Correct you are on their needs, which i think they would have been better served if they had addressed them instead of Love at that time.
@benhogan76 Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Last 10 first round picks, 9 Defensive and QB last year, who doesn’t seem close to being backup. You are right he selfish. Packers dont get eliminated from the Playoffs because of their lack of offense
Fairly confused here? They wasted a 1st round pick, they traded up to waste that pick. Only reason to draft QB in first round is if he will play within 1 year. They bet on Rogers regressing and were way off.
22nd
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
@benhogan76 Quote Originally Posted by benhogan76: Last 10 first round picks, 9 Defensive and QB last year, who doesn’t seem close to being backup. You are right he selfish. Packers dont get eliminated from the Playoffs because of their lack of offense
Fairly confused here? They wasted a 1st round pick, they traded up to waste that pick. Only reason to draft QB in first round is if he will play within 1 year. They bet on Rogers regressing and were way off.
[Quote: Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234] Love was a great pick, dont think they had to trade up to get him, but he has all the tools that Rodgers does plus can run...[/Quote]
Dude...Love didn't even play D-1 Football...a great pick...what the hey??????
Smokin' that Wisconsin cheddar ...damn shame.
0
[Quote: Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234] Love was a great pick, dont think they had to trade up to get him, but he has all the tools that Rodgers does plus can run...[/Quote]
Dude...Love didn't even play D-1 Football...a great pick...what the hey??????
Plus Rodgers has arguably the best arm in history. I know he isn't in his prime, but we have all seen him make throws that I don't know if anybody else good. All the tools Rodgers has?Dude is insane.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
0
@DB51daBEARS
Plus Rodgers has arguably the best arm in history. I know he isn't in his prime, but we have all seen him make throws that I don't know if anybody else good. All the tools Rodgers has?Dude is insane.
In the final analysis, Rodgers is taking his frustrations out on the fans, (the Green Bay Packers, owners of the team). That is No class in my opinion.
I would have written an open letter to all Green Bay owners/fans and explained the situation. But No, he has to act childish. Getting the coach fired, and going after the General manager. And then waiting until the draft to get even with him. And now his says the Raiders look interesting !
Seems like he thinks HE owns the team.
As an avid football fan, I always loved the Packers, but Aaron, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
0
In the final analysis, Rodgers is taking his frustrations out on the fans, (the Green Bay Packers, owners of the team). That is No class in my opinion.
I would have written an open letter to all Green Bay owners/fans and explained the situation. But No, he has to act childish. Getting the coach fired, and going after the General manager. And then waiting until the draft to get even with him. And now his says the Raiders look interesting !
Seems like he thinks HE owns the team.
As an avid football fan, I always loved the Packers, but Aaron, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234: Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Ask yourself what the Pack could have used more last year, an offensive weapon, or a back up qb. Neither, as they led the NFL in offense....they could have used a #2 corner and a Dline pass rusher.... Love was a great pick, dont think they had to trade up to get him, but he has all the tools that Rodgers does plus can run... Correct you are on their needs, which i think they would have been better served if they had addressed them instead of Love at that time.
Love is an identical QB to Rodgers, plus he can run....GB obviously wanted to get him practice under Rodgers for when he took over
0
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234: Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: Ask yourself what the Pack could have used more last year, an offensive weapon, or a back up qb. Neither, as they led the NFL in offense....they could have used a #2 corner and a Dline pass rusher.... Love was a great pick, dont think they had to trade up to get him, but he has all the tools that Rodgers does plus can run... Correct you are on their needs, which i think they would have been better served if they had addressed them instead of Love at that time.
Love is an identical QB to Rodgers, plus he can run....GB obviously wanted to get him practice under Rodgers for when he took over
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.