ok so your this weeks guy saying bet against saints. I am only going to address your lack of respect for the saints defense. First of all you fail to mention (and maybe cause it hurts your argument) that the saints have number one rush defense and the cowboys live off of elliot. The saints defense against the run is like tecmo bowl when you choose the offensive play correctly. Secondly the turnovers are not luck. You fail to recognize that the saints defense is conscious of what they are doing purposely trying to strip and deflect passes. These are the extra thoughts that count. The saints defense is coming together more and more every week. I do believe the cowboys defense is good however and this will be a challenge for the saints but they protected well against the rams d-line with Arron donald and company so yeah the thing is that the saints have not even played their best game yet. Dallas is another tune up game for the playoffs and beyond. Oh and didn't the saints sacked matt ryan 6 times too? I am not saying the saints are a lock to cover but betting against them seems foolish.
ok so your this weeks guy saying bet against saints. I am only going to address your lack of respect for the saints defense. First of all you fail to mention (and maybe cause it hurts your argument) that the saints have number one rush defense and the cowboys live off of elliot. The saints defense against the run is like tecmo bowl when you choose the offensive play correctly. Secondly the turnovers are not luck. You fail to recognize that the saints defense is conscious of what they are doing purposely trying to strip and deflect passes. These are the extra thoughts that count. The saints defense is coming together more and more every week. I do believe the cowboys defense is good however and this will be a challenge for the saints but they protected well against the rams d-line with Arron donald and company so yeah the thing is that the saints have not even played their best game yet. Dallas is another tune up game for the playoffs and beyond. Oh and didn't the saints sacked matt ryan 6 times too? I am not saying the saints are a lock to cover but betting against them seems foolish.
Im on the otherside ... Just because Cowboys won 3 times in a row against so-so teams doesn't make them being able to face saints' number 1 OFF. Yes , Saints' DEF arent the best in the league but they are not the worst either. I would be careful going against Saints. They are beatable but NOT by cowboys... Im on Saints -7 , BOL !!!
Im on the otherside ... Just because Cowboys won 3 times in a row against so-so teams doesn't make them being able to face saints' number 1 OFF. Yes , Saints' DEF arent the best in the league but they are not the worst either. I would be careful going against Saints. They are beatable but NOT by cowboys... Im on Saints -7 , BOL !!!
but Dallas backers will say , that's 'Before' the winning streak therefore, it doesnt count. Another argument is that Dallas has been improving since but how can you say they have improved when you won against so-so teams by 1 TD or less?
but Dallas backers will say , that's 'Before' the winning streak therefore, it doesnt count. Another argument is that Dallas has been improving since but how can you say they have improved when you won against so-so teams by 1 TD or less?
mm so:
- the strong point in saints defense is luck...
- rams could have easily beat them??? Ok! but they didnt and were actually down by a lot more than the final score indicates.
- Falcons game could have been closer, yes, i was on the falcons and fell short of the cover cause of all the fumbles... but its not luck man.
- They pounded de bengals and eagles by 100 points but hey! that doesnt count because they are not that good... sure, thats why they always lose by those margins
Havent decided if ill play anything tomorrow but cmon man you are just doing a bit of confirmation bias by yourself here
mm so:
- the strong point in saints defense is luck...
- rams could have easily beat them??? Ok! but they didnt and were actually down by a lot more than the final score indicates.
- Falcons game could have been closer, yes, i was on the falcons and fell short of the cover cause of all the fumbles... but its not luck man.
- They pounded de bengals and eagles by 100 points but hey! that doesnt count because they are not that good... sure, thats why they always lose by those margins
Havent decided if ill play anything tomorrow but cmon man you are just doing a bit of confirmation bias by yourself here
mm so:
- the strong point in saints defense is luck...
- rams could have easily beat them??? Ok! but they didnt and were actually down by a lot more than the final score indicates.
- Falcons game could have been closer, yes, i was on the falcons and fell short of the cover cause of all the fumbles... but its not luck man.
- They pounded de bengals and eagles by 100 points but hey! that doesnt count because they are not that good... sure, thats why they always lose by those margins
Havent decided if ill play anything tomorrow but cmon man you are just doing a bit of confirmation bias by yourself here
mm so:
- the strong point in saints defense is luck...
- rams could have easily beat them??? Ok! but they didnt and were actually down by a lot more than the final score indicates.
- Falcons game could have been closer, yes, i was on the falcons and fell short of the cover cause of all the fumbles... but its not luck man.
- They pounded de bengals and eagles by 100 points but hey! that doesnt count because they are not that good... sure, thats why they always lose by those margins
Havent decided if ill play anything tomorrow but cmon man you are just doing a bit of confirmation bias by yourself here
one could argue they found their game after the first two weeks, instead of being lucky all the way since.
I agree that lines are inflated with them thou
one could argue they found their game after the first two weeks, instead of being lucky all the way since.
I agree that lines are inflated with them thou
BOL Benny ! For sure, not everyone can be on the same page ever ... otherwise, Vegas would be bankrupted.
BOL Benny ! For sure, not everyone can be on the same page ever ... otherwise, Vegas would be bankrupted.
It's worth noting that the last two saints road games against quality defenses they scored 23 points on offense. This is really a matter of can the Cowboys score 20-23 points. I think they can. Their defense can hold the saints to less than 30. 7.5 is a high number. I dont think they could win. If they had Irving and Smith back at fill strength I would think differently
It's worth noting that the last two saints road games against quality defenses they scored 23 points on offense. This is really a matter of can the Cowboys score 20-23 points. I think they can. Their defense can hold the saints to less than 30. 7.5 is a high number. I dont think they could win. If they had Irving and Smith back at fill strength I would think differently
One game doesn't equal a losing month. That being said, Vegas has been losing lots of money on New Orleans for several weeks in a row now. And on the over.....
One game doesn't equal a losing month. That being said, Vegas has been losing lots of money on New Orleans for several weeks in a row now. And on the over.....
but we also have to understand, sports betting are pennies for Vegas.
but we also have to understand, sports betting are pennies for Vegas.
If you are not impressed by back-to-back victories of 51-14, then 48-7 against NFL teams (not college, NFL), then you need to lay off this game. You've got way too much homerism at work skewing your play here.
Secondly, against the Vikings for example, that was not a case of the ball just rolling their way. Theilen got popped by a hard hitting LB AND a corner. The Saints TOOK the ball from him. That's not luck. I could give more examples like that, but I'm not going to waste my time.
Last, the Saints are what everyone thought the Rams would be. The Saints run defense is legit by yards per carry allowed. Like the Rams, they've got 1st round picks up and down that line. But unlike the Rams, al of them are the Saints own 1st round picks.
My advice to you is to lay off this game. You are still obviously butt hurt from that Vikings beat down. Go make a play where your mind is clear.
If you are not impressed by back-to-back victories of 51-14, then 48-7 against NFL teams (not college, NFL), then you need to lay off this game. You've got way too much homerism at work skewing your play here.
Secondly, against the Vikings for example, that was not a case of the ball just rolling their way. Theilen got popped by a hard hitting LB AND a corner. The Saints TOOK the ball from him. That's not luck. I could give more examples like that, but I'm not going to waste my time.
Last, the Saints are what everyone thought the Rams would be. The Saints run defense is legit by yards per carry allowed. Like the Rams, they've got 1st round picks up and down that line. But unlike the Rams, al of them are the Saints own 1st round picks.
My advice to you is to lay off this game. You are still obviously butt hurt from that Vikings beat down. Go make a play where your mind is clear.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.